Cargando…

Upper beak depression instead of elevation dominates cranial kinesis in woodpeckers

The value of birds’ ability to move the upper beak relative to the braincase has been shown in vital tasks like feeding and singing. In woodpeckers, such cranial kinesis has been thought to hinder pecking as delivering forceful blows calls for a head functioning as a rigid unit. Here, we tested whet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lyons, S., Baeckens, S., Van Wassenbergh, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10244965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37282489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2023.0148
_version_ 1785054763232002048
author Lyons, S.
Baeckens, S.
Van Wassenbergh, S.
author_facet Lyons, S.
Baeckens, S.
Van Wassenbergh, S.
author_sort Lyons, S.
collection PubMed
description The value of birds’ ability to move the upper beak relative to the braincase has been shown in vital tasks like feeding and singing. In woodpeckers, such cranial kinesis has been thought to hinder pecking as delivering forceful blows calls for a head functioning as a rigid unit. Here, we tested whether cranial kinesis is constrained in woodpeckers by comparing upper beak rotation during their daily activities such as food handling, calling and gaping with those from closely related species that also have a largely insectivorous diet but do not peck at wood. Both woodpeckers and non-woodpecker insectivores displayed upper beak rotations of up to 8 degrees. However, the direction of upper beak rotation differed significantly between the two groups, with woodpeckers displaying primarily depressions and non-woodpeckers displaying elevations. The divergent upper beak rotation of woodpeckers may be caused either by anatomical modifications to the craniofacial hinge that reduce elevation, by the caudal orientation of the mandible depressor muscle forcing beak depressions, or by both. Our results suggest that pecking does not result in plain rigidification at the upper beak's basis of woodpeckers, but it nevertheless significantly influences the way cranial kinesis is manifested.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10244965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102449652023-06-12 Upper beak depression instead of elevation dominates cranial kinesis in woodpeckers Lyons, S. Baeckens, S. Van Wassenbergh, S. Biol Lett Biomechanics The value of birds’ ability to move the upper beak relative to the braincase has been shown in vital tasks like feeding and singing. In woodpeckers, such cranial kinesis has been thought to hinder pecking as delivering forceful blows calls for a head functioning as a rigid unit. Here, we tested whether cranial kinesis is constrained in woodpeckers by comparing upper beak rotation during their daily activities such as food handling, calling and gaping with those from closely related species that also have a largely insectivorous diet but do not peck at wood. Both woodpeckers and non-woodpecker insectivores displayed upper beak rotations of up to 8 degrees. However, the direction of upper beak rotation differed significantly between the two groups, with woodpeckers displaying primarily depressions and non-woodpeckers displaying elevations. The divergent upper beak rotation of woodpeckers may be caused either by anatomical modifications to the craniofacial hinge that reduce elevation, by the caudal orientation of the mandible depressor muscle forcing beak depressions, or by both. Our results suggest that pecking does not result in plain rigidification at the upper beak's basis of woodpeckers, but it nevertheless significantly influences the way cranial kinesis is manifested. The Royal Society 2023-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10244965/ /pubmed/37282489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2023.0148 Text en © 2023 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Biomechanics
Lyons, S.
Baeckens, S.
Van Wassenbergh, S.
Upper beak depression instead of elevation dominates cranial kinesis in woodpeckers
title Upper beak depression instead of elevation dominates cranial kinesis in woodpeckers
title_full Upper beak depression instead of elevation dominates cranial kinesis in woodpeckers
title_fullStr Upper beak depression instead of elevation dominates cranial kinesis in woodpeckers
title_full_unstemmed Upper beak depression instead of elevation dominates cranial kinesis in woodpeckers
title_short Upper beak depression instead of elevation dominates cranial kinesis in woodpeckers
title_sort upper beak depression instead of elevation dominates cranial kinesis in woodpeckers
topic Biomechanics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10244965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37282489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2023.0148
work_keys_str_mv AT lyonss upperbeakdepressioninsteadofelevationdominatescranialkinesisinwoodpeckers
AT baeckenss upperbeakdepressioninsteadofelevationdominatescranialkinesisinwoodpeckers
AT vanwassenberghs upperbeakdepressioninsteadofelevationdominatescranialkinesisinwoodpeckers