Cargando…
Upper beak depression instead of elevation dominates cranial kinesis in woodpeckers
The value of birds’ ability to move the upper beak relative to the braincase has been shown in vital tasks like feeding and singing. In woodpeckers, such cranial kinesis has been thought to hinder pecking as delivering forceful blows calls for a head functioning as a rigid unit. Here, we tested whet...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10244965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37282489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2023.0148 |
_version_ | 1785054763232002048 |
---|---|
author | Lyons, S. Baeckens, S. Van Wassenbergh, S. |
author_facet | Lyons, S. Baeckens, S. Van Wassenbergh, S. |
author_sort | Lyons, S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The value of birds’ ability to move the upper beak relative to the braincase has been shown in vital tasks like feeding and singing. In woodpeckers, such cranial kinesis has been thought to hinder pecking as delivering forceful blows calls for a head functioning as a rigid unit. Here, we tested whether cranial kinesis is constrained in woodpeckers by comparing upper beak rotation during their daily activities such as food handling, calling and gaping with those from closely related species that also have a largely insectivorous diet but do not peck at wood. Both woodpeckers and non-woodpecker insectivores displayed upper beak rotations of up to 8 degrees. However, the direction of upper beak rotation differed significantly between the two groups, with woodpeckers displaying primarily depressions and non-woodpeckers displaying elevations. The divergent upper beak rotation of woodpeckers may be caused either by anatomical modifications to the craniofacial hinge that reduce elevation, by the caudal orientation of the mandible depressor muscle forcing beak depressions, or by both. Our results suggest that pecking does not result in plain rigidification at the upper beak's basis of woodpeckers, but it nevertheless significantly influences the way cranial kinesis is manifested. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10244965 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102449652023-06-12 Upper beak depression instead of elevation dominates cranial kinesis in woodpeckers Lyons, S. Baeckens, S. Van Wassenbergh, S. Biol Lett Biomechanics The value of birds’ ability to move the upper beak relative to the braincase has been shown in vital tasks like feeding and singing. In woodpeckers, such cranial kinesis has been thought to hinder pecking as delivering forceful blows calls for a head functioning as a rigid unit. Here, we tested whether cranial kinesis is constrained in woodpeckers by comparing upper beak rotation during their daily activities such as food handling, calling and gaping with those from closely related species that also have a largely insectivorous diet but do not peck at wood. Both woodpeckers and non-woodpecker insectivores displayed upper beak rotations of up to 8 degrees. However, the direction of upper beak rotation differed significantly between the two groups, with woodpeckers displaying primarily depressions and non-woodpeckers displaying elevations. The divergent upper beak rotation of woodpeckers may be caused either by anatomical modifications to the craniofacial hinge that reduce elevation, by the caudal orientation of the mandible depressor muscle forcing beak depressions, or by both. Our results suggest that pecking does not result in plain rigidification at the upper beak's basis of woodpeckers, but it nevertheless significantly influences the way cranial kinesis is manifested. The Royal Society 2023-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10244965/ /pubmed/37282489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2023.0148 Text en © 2023 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Biomechanics Lyons, S. Baeckens, S. Van Wassenbergh, S. Upper beak depression instead of elevation dominates cranial kinesis in woodpeckers |
title | Upper beak depression instead of elevation dominates cranial kinesis in woodpeckers |
title_full | Upper beak depression instead of elevation dominates cranial kinesis in woodpeckers |
title_fullStr | Upper beak depression instead of elevation dominates cranial kinesis in woodpeckers |
title_full_unstemmed | Upper beak depression instead of elevation dominates cranial kinesis in woodpeckers |
title_short | Upper beak depression instead of elevation dominates cranial kinesis in woodpeckers |
title_sort | upper beak depression instead of elevation dominates cranial kinesis in woodpeckers |
topic | Biomechanics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10244965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37282489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2023.0148 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lyonss upperbeakdepressioninsteadofelevationdominatescranialkinesisinwoodpeckers AT baeckenss upperbeakdepressioninsteadofelevationdominatescranialkinesisinwoodpeckers AT vanwassenberghs upperbeakdepressioninsteadofelevationdominatescranialkinesisinwoodpeckers |