Cargando…
Deep learning for pneumothorax diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Deep learning (DL), a subset of artificial intelligence (AI), has been applied to pneumothorax diagnosis to aid physician diagnosis, but no meta-analysis has been performed. METHODS: A search of multiple electronic databases through September 2022 was performed to identify studies that a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Respiratory Society
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10245141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37286217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0259-2022 |
_version_ | 1785054799382708224 |
---|---|
author | Sugibayashi, Takahiro Walston, Shannon L. Matsumoto, Toshimasa Mitsuyama, Yasuhito Miki, Yukio Ueda, Daiju |
author_facet | Sugibayashi, Takahiro Walston, Shannon L. Matsumoto, Toshimasa Mitsuyama, Yasuhito Miki, Yukio Ueda, Daiju |
author_sort | Sugibayashi, Takahiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Deep learning (DL), a subset of artificial intelligence (AI), has been applied to pneumothorax diagnosis to aid physician diagnosis, but no meta-analysis has been performed. METHODS: A search of multiple electronic databases through September 2022 was performed to identify studies that applied DL for pneumothorax diagnosis using imaging. Meta-analysis via a hierarchical model to calculate the summary area under the curve (AUC) and pooled sensitivity and specificity for both DL and physicians was performed. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Prediction Model Study Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. RESULTS: In 56 of the 63 primary studies, pneumothorax was identified from chest radiography. The total AUC was 0.97 (95% CI 0.96–0.98) for both DL and physicians. The total pooled sensitivity was 84% (95% CI 79–89%) for DL and 85% (95% CI 73–92%) for physicians and the pooled specificity was 96% (95% CI 94–98%) for DL and 98% (95% CI 95–99%) for physicians. More than half of the original studies (57%) had a high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: Our review found the diagnostic performance of DL models was similar to that of physicians, although the majority of studies had a high risk of bias. Further pneumothorax AI research is needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10245141 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | European Respiratory Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102451412023-06-08 Deep learning for pneumothorax diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Sugibayashi, Takahiro Walston, Shannon L. Matsumoto, Toshimasa Mitsuyama, Yasuhito Miki, Yukio Ueda, Daiju Eur Respir Rev Reviews BACKGROUND: Deep learning (DL), a subset of artificial intelligence (AI), has been applied to pneumothorax diagnosis to aid physician diagnosis, but no meta-analysis has been performed. METHODS: A search of multiple electronic databases through September 2022 was performed to identify studies that applied DL for pneumothorax diagnosis using imaging. Meta-analysis via a hierarchical model to calculate the summary area under the curve (AUC) and pooled sensitivity and specificity for both DL and physicians was performed. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Prediction Model Study Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. RESULTS: In 56 of the 63 primary studies, pneumothorax was identified from chest radiography. The total AUC was 0.97 (95% CI 0.96–0.98) for both DL and physicians. The total pooled sensitivity was 84% (95% CI 79–89%) for DL and 85% (95% CI 73–92%) for physicians and the pooled specificity was 96% (95% CI 94–98%) for DL and 98% (95% CI 95–99%) for physicians. More than half of the original studies (57%) had a high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: Our review found the diagnostic performance of DL models was similar to that of physicians, although the majority of studies had a high risk of bias. Further pneumothorax AI research is needed. European Respiratory Society 2023-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10245141/ /pubmed/37286217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0259-2022 Text en Copyright ©The authors 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org (mailto:permissions@ersnet.org) |
spellingShingle | Reviews Sugibayashi, Takahiro Walston, Shannon L. Matsumoto, Toshimasa Mitsuyama, Yasuhito Miki, Yukio Ueda, Daiju Deep learning for pneumothorax diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Deep learning for pneumothorax diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Deep learning for pneumothorax diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Deep learning for pneumothorax diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Deep learning for pneumothorax diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Deep learning for pneumothorax diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | deep learning for pneumothorax diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10245141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37286217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0259-2022 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sugibayashitakahiro deeplearningforpneumothoraxdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT walstonshannonl deeplearningforpneumothoraxdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT matsumototoshimasa deeplearningforpneumothoraxdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mitsuyamayasuhito deeplearningforpneumothoraxdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mikiyukio deeplearningforpneumothoraxdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT uedadaiju deeplearningforpneumothoraxdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |