Cargando…

Deep learning for pneumothorax diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Deep learning (DL), a subset of artificial intelligence (AI), has been applied to pneumothorax diagnosis to aid physician diagnosis, but no meta-analysis has been performed. METHODS: A search of multiple electronic databases through September 2022 was performed to identify studies that a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sugibayashi, Takahiro, Walston, Shannon L., Matsumoto, Toshimasa, Mitsuyama, Yasuhito, Miki, Yukio, Ueda, Daiju
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Respiratory Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10245141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37286217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0259-2022
_version_ 1785054799382708224
author Sugibayashi, Takahiro
Walston, Shannon L.
Matsumoto, Toshimasa
Mitsuyama, Yasuhito
Miki, Yukio
Ueda, Daiju
author_facet Sugibayashi, Takahiro
Walston, Shannon L.
Matsumoto, Toshimasa
Mitsuyama, Yasuhito
Miki, Yukio
Ueda, Daiju
author_sort Sugibayashi, Takahiro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Deep learning (DL), a subset of artificial intelligence (AI), has been applied to pneumothorax diagnosis to aid physician diagnosis, but no meta-analysis has been performed. METHODS: A search of multiple electronic databases through September 2022 was performed to identify studies that applied DL for pneumothorax diagnosis using imaging. Meta-analysis via a hierarchical model to calculate the summary area under the curve (AUC) and pooled sensitivity and specificity for both DL and physicians was performed. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Prediction Model Study Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. RESULTS: In 56 of the 63 primary studies, pneumothorax was identified from chest radiography. The total AUC was 0.97 (95% CI 0.96–0.98) for both DL and physicians. The total pooled sensitivity was 84% (95% CI 79–89%) for DL and 85% (95% CI 73–92%) for physicians and the pooled specificity was 96% (95% CI 94–98%) for DL and 98% (95% CI 95–99%) for physicians. More than half of the original studies (57%) had a high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: Our review found the diagnostic performance of DL models was similar to that of physicians, although the majority of studies had a high risk of bias. Further pneumothorax AI research is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10245141
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher European Respiratory Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102451412023-06-08 Deep learning for pneumothorax diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Sugibayashi, Takahiro Walston, Shannon L. Matsumoto, Toshimasa Mitsuyama, Yasuhito Miki, Yukio Ueda, Daiju Eur Respir Rev Reviews BACKGROUND: Deep learning (DL), a subset of artificial intelligence (AI), has been applied to pneumothorax diagnosis to aid physician diagnosis, but no meta-analysis has been performed. METHODS: A search of multiple electronic databases through September 2022 was performed to identify studies that applied DL for pneumothorax diagnosis using imaging. Meta-analysis via a hierarchical model to calculate the summary area under the curve (AUC) and pooled sensitivity and specificity for both DL and physicians was performed. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Prediction Model Study Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. RESULTS: In 56 of the 63 primary studies, pneumothorax was identified from chest radiography. The total AUC was 0.97 (95% CI 0.96–0.98) for both DL and physicians. The total pooled sensitivity was 84% (95% CI 79–89%) for DL and 85% (95% CI 73–92%) for physicians and the pooled specificity was 96% (95% CI 94–98%) for DL and 98% (95% CI 95–99%) for physicians. More than half of the original studies (57%) had a high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: Our review found the diagnostic performance of DL models was similar to that of physicians, although the majority of studies had a high risk of bias. Further pneumothorax AI research is needed. European Respiratory Society 2023-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10245141/ /pubmed/37286217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0259-2022 Text en Copyright ©The authors 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org (mailto:permissions@ersnet.org)
spellingShingle Reviews
Sugibayashi, Takahiro
Walston, Shannon L.
Matsumoto, Toshimasa
Mitsuyama, Yasuhito
Miki, Yukio
Ueda, Daiju
Deep learning for pneumothorax diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Deep learning for pneumothorax diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Deep learning for pneumothorax diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Deep learning for pneumothorax diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Deep learning for pneumothorax diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Deep learning for pneumothorax diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort deep learning for pneumothorax diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10245141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37286217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0259-2022
work_keys_str_mv AT sugibayashitakahiro deeplearningforpneumothoraxdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT walstonshannonl deeplearningforpneumothoraxdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT matsumototoshimasa deeplearningforpneumothoraxdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mitsuyamayasuhito deeplearningforpneumothoraxdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mikiyukio deeplearningforpneumothoraxdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT uedadaiju deeplearningforpneumothoraxdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis