Cargando…

高通量自动化免疫磁珠净化-超高效液相色谱法检测饲料中4种黄曲霉毒素

Aflatoxin (AFT) is an extremely toxic and highly toxic carcinogenic substance. This is particularly problematic due to the risk of aflatoxin contamination in raw feed materials and products during production, transportation, and storage. In this study, immunoaffinity magnetic beads (IMBs) were prepa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: CHEN, Jinnan, WANG, Meng, DONG, Zemin, YE, Jin, LI, Li, WU, Yu, LIU, Hongmei, WANG, Songxue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial board of Chinese Journal of Chromatography 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10245217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37259875
http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1123.2022.09006
_version_ 1785054816166215680
author CHEN, Jinnan
WANG, Meng
DONG, Zemin
YE, Jin
LI, Li
WU, Yu
LIU, Hongmei
WANG, Songxue
author_facet CHEN, Jinnan
WANG, Meng
DONG, Zemin
YE, Jin
LI, Li
WU, Yu
LIU, Hongmei
WANG, Songxue
author_sort CHEN, Jinnan
collection PubMed
description Aflatoxin (AFT) is an extremely toxic and highly toxic carcinogenic substance. This is particularly problematic due to the risk of aflatoxin contamination in raw feed materials and products during production, transportation, and storage. In this study, immunoaffinity magnetic beads (IMBs) were prepared for the purification of four aflatoxins (aflatoxin B(1) (AFB(1)), aflatoxin B(2) (AFB(2)), aflatoxin G(1) (AFG(1)) and aflatoxin G(2) (AFG(2))). The aflatoxin contents were then determined rapidly and accurately using ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC). More specifically, the coupling ratio of magnetic beads (MBs) to the aflatoxin monoclonal antibody was initially optimized, wherein an MB volume of 1 mL and an antibody content of 2.0 mg was found to meet the purification requirements of this method. The magnetic properties of the MBs and the IMBs were then investigated using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) at room temperature. As a result, the maximum saturation super magnetizations of the MBs and the IMBs were determined to be 28.61 and 23.22 emu/g, respectively, indicating that the saturation magnetization intensity of the IMBs was reduced by coupling with a non-magnetic antibody. However, the saturation magnetization intensity remained sufficiently high to permit magnetic separation from the solution. In addition, the appearance of the IMBs was examined using a biomicroscope, and it was clear that the magnetic cores were wrapped in agarose gel. Furthermore, the reaction time between the IMBs and the aflatoxins was investigated, and the optimal reaction time for meeting the purification requirements was determined to be 2 min. The stability of the IMBs was then evaluated under refrigerated storage conditions at 4 ℃. It was found that the prepared IMBs maintained a high aflatoxin enrichment capacity for at least eight months. Through the examination of three different extraction solutions, a mixture of acetonitrile and water (70∶30, v/v) was found to be optimal for the extraction of aflatoxins from the feed samples. Moreover, five sample dilutions and purification effects were also examined, and phosphate-buffered saline (containing 0.5% Tween-20) was selected as the preferred sample dilutant. With the optimized conditions, the effectiveness of using IMB for the purification of different feed samples was investigated. The resulting UPLC chromatogram showed no spurious peaks close to the target peaks, demonstrating a good purification performance. Following matrix spiking (5, 20, and 40 μg/kg, calculated based on AFB(1)) of the four feed samples (i. e., soybean meal, distillers dried grains with solubles, pig feed, and chicken feed), the spiked recoveries of the four aflatoxins ranged from 91.1% to 119.4% with a relative standard deviation (RSD) of <6.9%. In addition, the inter-day precision was 4.5% to 7.5%, and the method exhibited a good reproducibility. Subsequently, the developed method was used to detect AFB(1) using reference materials. The test value was 18.6 μg/kg with an accuracy of 110.3%, thereby constituting satisfactory results. Upon testing 21 randomly purchased feed samples using this method, four of these samples contained AFB(1), and the test results obtained using the developed method and stable isotope dilution LC-MS/MS were comparable. It was therefore apparent that the IMB purification method combined with UPLC analysis exhibited a good accuracy for aflatoxin determination. Thus, an automatic purification system was established to facilitate the operation and use of IMBs. This system was able to purify 24 samples simultaneously in 30 min. An IMB purification kit for was also designed and produced for aflatoxin detection in feed samples. The kit contained the sample dilutant, IMBs, the washing solution, and the eluent. After extraction of the feed sample, the extraction solution was added to the sample wells provided in the kit, and the purification system automatically completed the steps of aflatoxin enrichment, impurity washing, and elution of the target toxin. It should be noted that the purification process does not require the operator to manually add the solution, thereby simplifying operation. Overall, the purification method established in this study achieved the high-throughput and automatic purification of the four aflatoxins in feed samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10245217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Editorial board of Chinese Journal of Chromatography
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102452172023-06-08 高通量自动化免疫磁珠净化-超高效液相色谱法检测饲料中4种黄曲霉毒素 CHEN, Jinnan WANG, Meng DONG, Zemin YE, Jin LI, Li WU, Yu LIU, Hongmei WANG, Songxue Se Pu Articles Aflatoxin (AFT) is an extremely toxic and highly toxic carcinogenic substance. This is particularly problematic due to the risk of aflatoxin contamination in raw feed materials and products during production, transportation, and storage. In this study, immunoaffinity magnetic beads (IMBs) were prepared for the purification of four aflatoxins (aflatoxin B(1) (AFB(1)), aflatoxin B(2) (AFB(2)), aflatoxin G(1) (AFG(1)) and aflatoxin G(2) (AFG(2))). The aflatoxin contents were then determined rapidly and accurately using ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC). More specifically, the coupling ratio of magnetic beads (MBs) to the aflatoxin monoclonal antibody was initially optimized, wherein an MB volume of 1 mL and an antibody content of 2.0 mg was found to meet the purification requirements of this method. The magnetic properties of the MBs and the IMBs were then investigated using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) at room temperature. As a result, the maximum saturation super magnetizations of the MBs and the IMBs were determined to be 28.61 and 23.22 emu/g, respectively, indicating that the saturation magnetization intensity of the IMBs was reduced by coupling with a non-magnetic antibody. However, the saturation magnetization intensity remained sufficiently high to permit magnetic separation from the solution. In addition, the appearance of the IMBs was examined using a biomicroscope, and it was clear that the magnetic cores were wrapped in agarose gel. Furthermore, the reaction time between the IMBs and the aflatoxins was investigated, and the optimal reaction time for meeting the purification requirements was determined to be 2 min. The stability of the IMBs was then evaluated under refrigerated storage conditions at 4 ℃. It was found that the prepared IMBs maintained a high aflatoxin enrichment capacity for at least eight months. Through the examination of three different extraction solutions, a mixture of acetonitrile and water (70∶30, v/v) was found to be optimal for the extraction of aflatoxins from the feed samples. Moreover, five sample dilutions and purification effects were also examined, and phosphate-buffered saline (containing 0.5% Tween-20) was selected as the preferred sample dilutant. With the optimized conditions, the effectiveness of using IMB for the purification of different feed samples was investigated. The resulting UPLC chromatogram showed no spurious peaks close to the target peaks, demonstrating a good purification performance. Following matrix spiking (5, 20, and 40 μg/kg, calculated based on AFB(1)) of the four feed samples (i. e., soybean meal, distillers dried grains with solubles, pig feed, and chicken feed), the spiked recoveries of the four aflatoxins ranged from 91.1% to 119.4% with a relative standard deviation (RSD) of <6.9%. In addition, the inter-day precision was 4.5% to 7.5%, and the method exhibited a good reproducibility. Subsequently, the developed method was used to detect AFB(1) using reference materials. The test value was 18.6 μg/kg with an accuracy of 110.3%, thereby constituting satisfactory results. Upon testing 21 randomly purchased feed samples using this method, four of these samples contained AFB(1), and the test results obtained using the developed method and stable isotope dilution LC-MS/MS were comparable. It was therefore apparent that the IMB purification method combined with UPLC analysis exhibited a good accuracy for aflatoxin determination. Thus, an automatic purification system was established to facilitate the operation and use of IMBs. This system was able to purify 24 samples simultaneously in 30 min. An IMB purification kit for was also designed and produced for aflatoxin detection in feed samples. The kit contained the sample dilutant, IMBs, the washing solution, and the eluent. After extraction of the feed sample, the extraction solution was added to the sample wells provided in the kit, and the purification system automatically completed the steps of aflatoxin enrichment, impurity washing, and elution of the target toxin. It should be noted that the purification process does not require the operator to manually add the solution, thereby simplifying operation. Overall, the purification method established in this study achieved the high-throughput and automatic purification of the four aflatoxins in feed samples. Editorial board of Chinese Journal of Chromatography 2023-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10245217/ /pubmed/37259875 http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1123.2022.09006 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/本文是开放获取文章,遵循CC BY 4.0协议 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Articles
CHEN, Jinnan
WANG, Meng
DONG, Zemin
YE, Jin
LI, Li
WU, Yu
LIU, Hongmei
WANG, Songxue
高通量自动化免疫磁珠净化-超高效液相色谱法检测饲料中4种黄曲霉毒素
title 高通量自动化免疫磁珠净化-超高效液相色谱法检测饲料中4种黄曲霉毒素
title_full 高通量自动化免疫磁珠净化-超高效液相色谱法检测饲料中4种黄曲霉毒素
title_fullStr 高通量自动化免疫磁珠净化-超高效液相色谱法检测饲料中4种黄曲霉毒素
title_full_unstemmed 高通量自动化免疫磁珠净化-超高效液相色谱法检测饲料中4种黄曲霉毒素
title_short 高通量自动化免疫磁珠净化-超高效液相色谱法检测饲料中4种黄曲霉毒素
title_sort 高通量自动化免疫磁珠净化-超高效液相色谱法检测饲料中4种黄曲霉毒素
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10245217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37259875
http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1123.2022.09006
work_keys_str_mv AT chenjinnan gāotōngliàngzìdònghuàmiǎnyìcízhūjìnghuàchāogāoxiàoyèxiāngsèpǔfǎjiǎncèsìliàozhōng4zhǒnghuángqūméidúsù
AT wangmeng gāotōngliàngzìdònghuàmiǎnyìcízhūjìnghuàchāogāoxiàoyèxiāngsèpǔfǎjiǎncèsìliàozhōng4zhǒnghuángqūméidúsù
AT dongzemin gāotōngliàngzìdònghuàmiǎnyìcízhūjìnghuàchāogāoxiàoyèxiāngsèpǔfǎjiǎncèsìliàozhōng4zhǒnghuángqūméidúsù
AT yejin gāotōngliàngzìdònghuàmiǎnyìcízhūjìnghuàchāogāoxiàoyèxiāngsèpǔfǎjiǎncèsìliàozhōng4zhǒnghuángqūméidúsù
AT lili gāotōngliàngzìdònghuàmiǎnyìcízhūjìnghuàchāogāoxiàoyèxiāngsèpǔfǎjiǎncèsìliàozhōng4zhǒnghuángqūméidúsù
AT wuyu gāotōngliàngzìdònghuàmiǎnyìcízhūjìnghuàchāogāoxiàoyèxiāngsèpǔfǎjiǎncèsìliàozhōng4zhǒnghuángqūméidúsù
AT liuhongmei gāotōngliàngzìdònghuàmiǎnyìcízhūjìnghuàchāogāoxiàoyèxiāngsèpǔfǎjiǎncèsìliàozhōng4zhǒnghuángqūméidúsù
AT wangsongxue gāotōngliàngzìdònghuàmiǎnyìcízhūjìnghuàchāogāoxiàoyèxiāngsèpǔfǎjiǎncèsìliàozhōng4zhǒnghuángqūméidúsù