Cargando…

Opioid sparing effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine in orthopaedic surgery: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective alpha-2 receptor agonist without any effect on the GABA receptor. It provides an excellent sedative and analgesic profile with few side effects. We report our experience with dexmedetomidine use during orthopaedic surgery under locoregional anaesthes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Donatiello, Valerio, Alfieri, Aniello, Napolitano, Andrea, Maffei, Vincenzo, Coppolino, Francesco, Pota, Vincenzo, Passavanti, Maria Beatrice, Pace, Maria Caterina, Sansone, Pasquale
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10245478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37386676
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s44158-022-00076-1
_version_ 1785054871216455680
author Donatiello, Valerio
Alfieri, Aniello
Napolitano, Andrea
Maffei, Vincenzo
Coppolino, Francesco
Pota, Vincenzo
Passavanti, Maria Beatrice
Pace, Maria Caterina
Sansone, Pasquale
author_facet Donatiello, Valerio
Alfieri, Aniello
Napolitano, Andrea
Maffei, Vincenzo
Coppolino, Francesco
Pota, Vincenzo
Passavanti, Maria Beatrice
Pace, Maria Caterina
Sansone, Pasquale
author_sort Donatiello, Valerio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective alpha-2 receptor agonist without any effect on the GABA receptor. It provides an excellent sedative and analgesic profile with few side effects. We report our experience with dexmedetomidine use during orthopaedic surgery under locoregional anaesthesia to ensure adequate sedation and optimal postoperative pain control. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, we included 128 patients who underwent orthopaedic surgery between January 2019 and December 2021. All patients received the same local anaesthetic dose of 20 ml of ropivacaine 0.375% + mepivacaine 0.5% for axillary and supraclavicular block and 35 ml of ropivacaine 0.375% + mepivacaine 0.5% for triple nerve block (femoral, obturator and sciatic nerve). The cohort was divided into two groups based on sedation drugs used during surgery (dexmedetomidine, or group D, vs midazolam, or group M). All patients received postoperative 24-h analgesia consisting of 60 mg of ketorolac, 200 mg of tramadol and 4 mg of ondansetron. The primary outcome measured how many patients in the two groups required an analgesic rescue dose of pethidine and the time to first pethidine administration. To reduce confounding, we included patients in two groups with non-statistically different demo-anamnestic parameters and who received the same dose of intraoperative local anaesthetic and postoperative analgesia. RESULTS: The number of patients in group D who did not require a rescue dose of analgesia was significantly greater than in group M (49 vs 11, p < 0.001). Time-to-first postoperative opioid administration did not show a fundamental difference between the two groups under examination (523.75 ± 131.55 min vs 564 ± 117.84 min). Total opioid consumption was higher in the M group than in the D group (3529.8 ± 30.36 μg vs 1864.8 ± 31.59 μg, p 0.075), with a mean opioid consumption significantly higher in the M group than in the D group (26.26 ± 42.8 μg vs 69.21 ± 46.1 μg, p < 0.001): D group received 62.06% less opioid than M group. CONCLUSIONS: The continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine during orthopaedic surgery performed under locoregional anaesthesia has been shown to increase the analgesic effect of local anaesthetics and reduce the consumption of major opioids in the postoperative period. Dexmedetomidine offers a unique ability to supply sedation and analgesia without respiratory depression, having a wide safety margin and an excellent sedative capacity. It does not increase the rate of postoperative complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10245478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102454782023-06-14 Opioid sparing effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine in orthopaedic surgery: a retrospective analysis Donatiello, Valerio Alfieri, Aniello Napolitano, Andrea Maffei, Vincenzo Coppolino, Francesco Pota, Vincenzo Passavanti, Maria Beatrice Pace, Maria Caterina Sansone, Pasquale J Anesth Analg Crit Care Original Article BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective alpha-2 receptor agonist without any effect on the GABA receptor. It provides an excellent sedative and analgesic profile with few side effects. We report our experience with dexmedetomidine use during orthopaedic surgery under locoregional anaesthesia to ensure adequate sedation and optimal postoperative pain control. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, we included 128 patients who underwent orthopaedic surgery between January 2019 and December 2021. All patients received the same local anaesthetic dose of 20 ml of ropivacaine 0.375% + mepivacaine 0.5% for axillary and supraclavicular block and 35 ml of ropivacaine 0.375% + mepivacaine 0.5% for triple nerve block (femoral, obturator and sciatic nerve). The cohort was divided into two groups based on sedation drugs used during surgery (dexmedetomidine, or group D, vs midazolam, or group M). All patients received postoperative 24-h analgesia consisting of 60 mg of ketorolac, 200 mg of tramadol and 4 mg of ondansetron. The primary outcome measured how many patients in the two groups required an analgesic rescue dose of pethidine and the time to first pethidine administration. To reduce confounding, we included patients in two groups with non-statistically different demo-anamnestic parameters and who received the same dose of intraoperative local anaesthetic and postoperative analgesia. RESULTS: The number of patients in group D who did not require a rescue dose of analgesia was significantly greater than in group M (49 vs 11, p < 0.001). Time-to-first postoperative opioid administration did not show a fundamental difference between the two groups under examination (523.75 ± 131.55 min vs 564 ± 117.84 min). Total opioid consumption was higher in the M group than in the D group (3529.8 ± 30.36 μg vs 1864.8 ± 31.59 μg, p 0.075), with a mean opioid consumption significantly higher in the M group than in the D group (26.26 ± 42.8 μg vs 69.21 ± 46.1 μg, p < 0.001): D group received 62.06% less opioid than M group. CONCLUSIONS: The continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine during orthopaedic surgery performed under locoregional anaesthesia has been shown to increase the analgesic effect of local anaesthetics and reduce the consumption of major opioids in the postoperative period. Dexmedetomidine offers a unique ability to supply sedation and analgesia without respiratory depression, having a wide safety margin and an excellent sedative capacity. It does not increase the rate of postoperative complications. BioMed Central 2022-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10245478/ /pubmed/37386676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s44158-022-00076-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Donatiello, Valerio
Alfieri, Aniello
Napolitano, Andrea
Maffei, Vincenzo
Coppolino, Francesco
Pota, Vincenzo
Passavanti, Maria Beatrice
Pace, Maria Caterina
Sansone, Pasquale
Opioid sparing effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine in orthopaedic surgery: a retrospective analysis
title Opioid sparing effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine in orthopaedic surgery: a retrospective analysis
title_full Opioid sparing effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine in orthopaedic surgery: a retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Opioid sparing effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine in orthopaedic surgery: a retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Opioid sparing effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine in orthopaedic surgery: a retrospective analysis
title_short Opioid sparing effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine in orthopaedic surgery: a retrospective analysis
title_sort opioid sparing effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine in orthopaedic surgery: a retrospective analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10245478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37386676
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s44158-022-00076-1
work_keys_str_mv AT donatiellovalerio opioidsparingeffectofintravenousdexmedetomidineinorthopaedicsurgeryaretrospectiveanalysis
AT alfierianiello opioidsparingeffectofintravenousdexmedetomidineinorthopaedicsurgeryaretrospectiveanalysis
AT napolitanoandrea opioidsparingeffectofintravenousdexmedetomidineinorthopaedicsurgeryaretrospectiveanalysis
AT maffeivincenzo opioidsparingeffectofintravenousdexmedetomidineinorthopaedicsurgeryaretrospectiveanalysis
AT coppolinofrancesco opioidsparingeffectofintravenousdexmedetomidineinorthopaedicsurgeryaretrospectiveanalysis
AT potavincenzo opioidsparingeffectofintravenousdexmedetomidineinorthopaedicsurgeryaretrospectiveanalysis
AT passavantimariabeatrice opioidsparingeffectofintravenousdexmedetomidineinorthopaedicsurgeryaretrospectiveanalysis
AT pacemariacaterina opioidsparingeffectofintravenousdexmedetomidineinorthopaedicsurgeryaretrospectiveanalysis
AT sansonepasquale opioidsparingeffectofintravenousdexmedetomidineinorthopaedicsurgeryaretrospectiveanalysis