Cargando…

A successive time-to-event model of phyllochron dynamics for hypothesis testing: application to the analysis of genetic and environmental effects in maize

BACKGROUND: The time between the appearance of successive leaves, or phyllochron, characterizes the vegetative development of annual plants. Hypothesis testing models, which allow the comparison of phyllochrons between genetic groups and/or environmental conditions, are usually based on regression o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Plancade, Sandra, Marchadier, Elodie, Huet, Sylvie, Ressayre, Adrienne, Noûs, Camille, Dillmann, Christine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10245529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37287031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-023-01029-7
_version_ 1785054881216724992
author Plancade, Sandra
Marchadier, Elodie
Huet, Sylvie
Ressayre, Adrienne
Noûs, Camille
Dillmann, Christine
author_facet Plancade, Sandra
Marchadier, Elodie
Huet, Sylvie
Ressayre, Adrienne
Noûs, Camille
Dillmann, Christine
author_sort Plancade, Sandra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The time between the appearance of successive leaves, or phyllochron, characterizes the vegetative development of annual plants. Hypothesis testing models, which allow the comparison of phyllochrons between genetic groups and/or environmental conditions, are usually based on regression of thermal time on the number of leaves; most of the time a constant leaf appearance rate is assumed. However regression models ignore auto-correlation of the leaf number process and may lead to biased testing procedures. Moreover, the hypothesis of constant leaf appearance rate may be too restrictive. METHODS: We propose a stochastic process model in which emergence of new leaves is considered to result from successive time-to-events. This model provides a flexible and more accurate modeling as well as unbiased testing procedures. It was applied to an original maize dataset collected in the field over three years on plants originating from two divergent selection experiments for flowering time in two maize inbred lines. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: We showed that the main differences in phyllochron were not observed between selection populations but rather between ancestral lines, years of experimentation and leaf ranks. Our results highlight a strong departure from the assumption of a constant leaf appearance rate over a season which could be related to climate variations, even if the impact of individual climate variables could not be clearly determined. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13007-023-01029-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10245529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102455292023-06-08 A successive time-to-event model of phyllochron dynamics for hypothesis testing: application to the analysis of genetic and environmental effects in maize Plancade, Sandra Marchadier, Elodie Huet, Sylvie Ressayre, Adrienne Noûs, Camille Dillmann, Christine Plant Methods Methodology BACKGROUND: The time between the appearance of successive leaves, or phyllochron, characterizes the vegetative development of annual plants. Hypothesis testing models, which allow the comparison of phyllochrons between genetic groups and/or environmental conditions, are usually based on regression of thermal time on the number of leaves; most of the time a constant leaf appearance rate is assumed. However regression models ignore auto-correlation of the leaf number process and may lead to biased testing procedures. Moreover, the hypothesis of constant leaf appearance rate may be too restrictive. METHODS: We propose a stochastic process model in which emergence of new leaves is considered to result from successive time-to-events. This model provides a flexible and more accurate modeling as well as unbiased testing procedures. It was applied to an original maize dataset collected in the field over three years on plants originating from two divergent selection experiments for flowering time in two maize inbred lines. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: We showed that the main differences in phyllochron were not observed between selection populations but rather between ancestral lines, years of experimentation and leaf ranks. Our results highlight a strong departure from the assumption of a constant leaf appearance rate over a season which could be related to climate variations, even if the impact of individual climate variables could not be clearly determined. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13007-023-01029-7. BioMed Central 2023-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10245529/ /pubmed/37287031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-023-01029-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Methodology
Plancade, Sandra
Marchadier, Elodie
Huet, Sylvie
Ressayre, Adrienne
Noûs, Camille
Dillmann, Christine
A successive time-to-event model of phyllochron dynamics for hypothesis testing: application to the analysis of genetic and environmental effects in maize
title A successive time-to-event model of phyllochron dynamics for hypothesis testing: application to the analysis of genetic and environmental effects in maize
title_full A successive time-to-event model of phyllochron dynamics for hypothesis testing: application to the analysis of genetic and environmental effects in maize
title_fullStr A successive time-to-event model of phyllochron dynamics for hypothesis testing: application to the analysis of genetic and environmental effects in maize
title_full_unstemmed A successive time-to-event model of phyllochron dynamics for hypothesis testing: application to the analysis of genetic and environmental effects in maize
title_short A successive time-to-event model of phyllochron dynamics for hypothesis testing: application to the analysis of genetic and environmental effects in maize
title_sort successive time-to-event model of phyllochron dynamics for hypothesis testing: application to the analysis of genetic and environmental effects in maize
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10245529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37287031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-023-01029-7
work_keys_str_mv AT plancadesandra asuccessivetimetoeventmodelofphyllochrondynamicsforhypothesistestingapplicationtotheanalysisofgeneticandenvironmentaleffectsinmaize
AT marchadierelodie asuccessivetimetoeventmodelofphyllochrondynamicsforhypothesistestingapplicationtotheanalysisofgeneticandenvironmentaleffectsinmaize
AT huetsylvie asuccessivetimetoeventmodelofphyllochrondynamicsforhypothesistestingapplicationtotheanalysisofgeneticandenvironmentaleffectsinmaize
AT ressayreadrienne asuccessivetimetoeventmodelofphyllochrondynamicsforhypothesistestingapplicationtotheanalysisofgeneticandenvironmentaleffectsinmaize
AT nouscamille asuccessivetimetoeventmodelofphyllochrondynamicsforhypothesistestingapplicationtotheanalysisofgeneticandenvironmentaleffectsinmaize
AT dillmannchristine asuccessivetimetoeventmodelofphyllochrondynamicsforhypothesistestingapplicationtotheanalysisofgeneticandenvironmentaleffectsinmaize
AT plancadesandra successivetimetoeventmodelofphyllochrondynamicsforhypothesistestingapplicationtotheanalysisofgeneticandenvironmentaleffectsinmaize
AT marchadierelodie successivetimetoeventmodelofphyllochrondynamicsforhypothesistestingapplicationtotheanalysisofgeneticandenvironmentaleffectsinmaize
AT huetsylvie successivetimetoeventmodelofphyllochrondynamicsforhypothesistestingapplicationtotheanalysisofgeneticandenvironmentaleffectsinmaize
AT ressayreadrienne successivetimetoeventmodelofphyllochrondynamicsforhypothesistestingapplicationtotheanalysisofgeneticandenvironmentaleffectsinmaize
AT nouscamille successivetimetoeventmodelofphyllochrondynamicsforhypothesistestingapplicationtotheanalysisofgeneticandenvironmentaleffectsinmaize
AT dillmannchristine successivetimetoeventmodelofphyllochrondynamicsforhypothesistestingapplicationtotheanalysisofgeneticandenvironmentaleffectsinmaize