Cargando…

Should we use diastolic function parameters to determine preload responsiveness in cardiac surgery? A pilot study

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) diastolic function (DF) may play an important role in predicting fluid responsiveness. However, few studies assessed the role of diastolic function in predicting fluid responsiveness. The aim of this pilot study was to assess whether parameters of right and left dia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Courbe, Athanase, Perrault-Hébert, Clotilde, Ion, Iolanda, Desjardins, Georges, Fortier, Annik, Denault, André, Deschamps, Alain, Couture, Pierre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10245646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37386580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s44158-021-00014-7
_version_ 1785054901309538304
author Courbe, Athanase
Perrault-Hébert, Clotilde
Ion, Iolanda
Desjardins, Georges
Fortier, Annik
Denault, André
Deschamps, Alain
Couture, Pierre
author_facet Courbe, Athanase
Perrault-Hébert, Clotilde
Ion, Iolanda
Desjardins, Georges
Fortier, Annik
Denault, André
Deschamps, Alain
Couture, Pierre
author_sort Courbe, Athanase
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) diastolic function (DF) may play an important role in predicting fluid responsiveness. However, few studies assessed the role of diastolic function in predicting fluid responsiveness. The aim of this pilot study was to assess whether parameters of right and left diastolic function assessed with transesophageal echocardiography, including the mitral E/e′ ratio, is associated with fluid responsiveness among patients undergoing elective bypass graft surgery. We also sought to compare other methods of fluid responsiveness assessment, including echocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters, pulse pressure variation, and stroke volume variation (SVV) (arterial pulse contour analysis, Flotrac/Vigileo system). RESULTS: We prospectively studied seventy patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) monitored with a radial arterial catheter, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and a pulmonary artery catheter (for cardiac output measurements), before and after the administration of 500 mL of crystalloid over 10 min after the anesthetic induction. Thirteen patients were excluded (total of 57 patients). Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in cardiac index of ≥ 15%. There were 21 responders (36.8%) and 36 non-responders (63.2%). No difference in baseline pulsed wave Doppler echocardiographic measurements of any components of the mitral, tricuspid, and pulmonary and hepatic venous flows were found between responders and non-responders. There was no difference in MV tissue Doppler measurements between responders and non-responders, including E/e′ ratio (8.7 ± 4.1 vs. 8.5 ± 2.8 in responders vs. non-responders, P = 0.85). SVV was the only independent variable to predict an increase in cardiac index by multivariate analysis (P = 0.0208, OR = 1.196, 95% CI (1.028-1.393)). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, we found that no parameters of right and left ventricular diastolic function were associated with fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing CABG. SVV was the most useful parameter to predict fluid responsiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT 02714244. Registered 21 March 2016—retrospectively registered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10245646
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102456462023-06-14 Should we use diastolic function parameters to determine preload responsiveness in cardiac surgery? A pilot study Courbe, Athanase Perrault-Hébert, Clotilde Ion, Iolanda Desjardins, Georges Fortier, Annik Denault, André Deschamps, Alain Couture, Pierre J Anesth Analg Crit Care Original Article BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) diastolic function (DF) may play an important role in predicting fluid responsiveness. However, few studies assessed the role of diastolic function in predicting fluid responsiveness. The aim of this pilot study was to assess whether parameters of right and left diastolic function assessed with transesophageal echocardiography, including the mitral E/e′ ratio, is associated with fluid responsiveness among patients undergoing elective bypass graft surgery. We also sought to compare other methods of fluid responsiveness assessment, including echocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters, pulse pressure variation, and stroke volume variation (SVV) (arterial pulse contour analysis, Flotrac/Vigileo system). RESULTS: We prospectively studied seventy patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) monitored with a radial arterial catheter, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and a pulmonary artery catheter (for cardiac output measurements), before and after the administration of 500 mL of crystalloid over 10 min after the anesthetic induction. Thirteen patients were excluded (total of 57 patients). Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in cardiac index of ≥ 15%. There were 21 responders (36.8%) and 36 non-responders (63.2%). No difference in baseline pulsed wave Doppler echocardiographic measurements of any components of the mitral, tricuspid, and pulmonary and hepatic venous flows were found between responders and non-responders. There was no difference in MV tissue Doppler measurements between responders and non-responders, including E/e′ ratio (8.7 ± 4.1 vs. 8.5 ± 2.8 in responders vs. non-responders, P = 0.85). SVV was the only independent variable to predict an increase in cardiac index by multivariate analysis (P = 0.0208, OR = 1.196, 95% CI (1.028-1.393)). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, we found that no parameters of right and left ventricular diastolic function were associated with fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing CABG. SVV was the most useful parameter to predict fluid responsiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT 02714244. Registered 21 March 2016—retrospectively registered. BioMed Central 2021-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10245646/ /pubmed/37386580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s44158-021-00014-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Courbe, Athanase
Perrault-Hébert, Clotilde
Ion, Iolanda
Desjardins, Georges
Fortier, Annik
Denault, André
Deschamps, Alain
Couture, Pierre
Should we use diastolic function parameters to determine preload responsiveness in cardiac surgery? A pilot study
title Should we use diastolic function parameters to determine preload responsiveness in cardiac surgery? A pilot study
title_full Should we use diastolic function parameters to determine preload responsiveness in cardiac surgery? A pilot study
title_fullStr Should we use diastolic function parameters to determine preload responsiveness in cardiac surgery? A pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Should we use diastolic function parameters to determine preload responsiveness in cardiac surgery? A pilot study
title_short Should we use diastolic function parameters to determine preload responsiveness in cardiac surgery? A pilot study
title_sort should we use diastolic function parameters to determine preload responsiveness in cardiac surgery? a pilot study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10245646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37386580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s44158-021-00014-7
work_keys_str_mv AT courbeathanase shouldweusediastolicfunctionparameterstodeterminepreloadresponsivenessincardiacsurgeryapilotstudy
AT perraulthebertclotilde shouldweusediastolicfunctionparameterstodeterminepreloadresponsivenessincardiacsurgeryapilotstudy
AT ioniolanda shouldweusediastolicfunctionparameterstodeterminepreloadresponsivenessincardiacsurgeryapilotstudy
AT desjardinsgeorges shouldweusediastolicfunctionparameterstodeterminepreloadresponsivenessincardiacsurgeryapilotstudy
AT fortierannik shouldweusediastolicfunctionparameterstodeterminepreloadresponsivenessincardiacsurgeryapilotstudy
AT denaultandre shouldweusediastolicfunctionparameterstodeterminepreloadresponsivenessincardiacsurgeryapilotstudy
AT deschampsalain shouldweusediastolicfunctionparameterstodeterminepreloadresponsivenessincardiacsurgeryapilotstudy
AT couturepierre shouldweusediastolicfunctionparameterstodeterminepreloadresponsivenessincardiacsurgeryapilotstudy