Cargando…

Mycolactone A vs. B: Does localization or association explain isomer-specific toxicity?

Mycolactone is an exotoxin produced by Mycobacterium ulcerans that causes the neglected tropical skin disease Buruli ulcer. This toxin inhibits the Sec61 translocon in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), preventing the host cell from producing many secretory and transmembrane proteins, resulting in cyto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nguyen, John D. M., da Hora, Gabriel C. A., Swanson, Jessica M. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10245786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37292660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.19.541532
_version_ 1785054925080756224
author Nguyen, John D. M.
da Hora, Gabriel C. A.
Swanson, Jessica M. J.
author_facet Nguyen, John D. M.
da Hora, Gabriel C. A.
Swanson, Jessica M. J.
author_sort Nguyen, John D. M.
collection PubMed
description Mycolactone is an exotoxin produced by Mycobacterium ulcerans that causes the neglected tropical skin disease Buruli ulcer. This toxin inhibits the Sec61 translocon in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), preventing the host cell from producing many secretory and transmembrane proteins, resulting in cytotoxic and immunomodulatory effects. Interestingly, only one of the two dominant isoforms of mycolactone is cytotoxic. Here, we investigate the origin of this specificity by performing extensive molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with enhanced free energy sampling to query the association trends of the two isoforms with both the Sec61 translocon and the ER membrane, which serves as a toxin reservoir prior to association. Our results suggest that mycolactone B (the cytotoxic isoform) has a stronger association with the ER membrane than mycolactone A due to more favorable interactions with membrane lipids and water molecules. This could increase the reservoir of toxin proximal to the Sec61 translocon. Isomer B also interacts more closely with the lumenal and lateral gates of the translocon, the dynamics of which are essential for protein translocation. These interactions induce a more closed conformation, which has been suggested to block signal peptide insertion and subsequent protein translocation. Collectively, these findings suggest that isomer B’s unique cytotoxicity is a consequence of both increased localization to the ER membrane and channel-locking association with the Sec61 translocon, facets that could be targeted in the development of Buruli Ulcer diagnostics and Sec61-targeted therapeutics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10245786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102457862023-06-08 Mycolactone A vs. B: Does localization or association explain isomer-specific toxicity? Nguyen, John D. M. da Hora, Gabriel C. A. Swanson, Jessica M. J. bioRxiv Article Mycolactone is an exotoxin produced by Mycobacterium ulcerans that causes the neglected tropical skin disease Buruli ulcer. This toxin inhibits the Sec61 translocon in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), preventing the host cell from producing many secretory and transmembrane proteins, resulting in cytotoxic and immunomodulatory effects. Interestingly, only one of the two dominant isoforms of mycolactone is cytotoxic. Here, we investigate the origin of this specificity by performing extensive molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with enhanced free energy sampling to query the association trends of the two isoforms with both the Sec61 translocon and the ER membrane, which serves as a toxin reservoir prior to association. Our results suggest that mycolactone B (the cytotoxic isoform) has a stronger association with the ER membrane than mycolactone A due to more favorable interactions with membrane lipids and water molecules. This could increase the reservoir of toxin proximal to the Sec61 translocon. Isomer B also interacts more closely with the lumenal and lateral gates of the translocon, the dynamics of which are essential for protein translocation. These interactions induce a more closed conformation, which has been suggested to block signal peptide insertion and subsequent protein translocation. Collectively, these findings suggest that isomer B’s unique cytotoxicity is a consequence of both increased localization to the ER membrane and channel-locking association with the Sec61 translocon, facets that could be targeted in the development of Buruli Ulcer diagnostics and Sec61-targeted therapeutics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10245786/ /pubmed/37292660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.19.541532 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which allows reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
spellingShingle Article
Nguyen, John D. M.
da Hora, Gabriel C. A.
Swanson, Jessica M. J.
Mycolactone A vs. B: Does localization or association explain isomer-specific toxicity?
title Mycolactone A vs. B: Does localization or association explain isomer-specific toxicity?
title_full Mycolactone A vs. B: Does localization or association explain isomer-specific toxicity?
title_fullStr Mycolactone A vs. B: Does localization or association explain isomer-specific toxicity?
title_full_unstemmed Mycolactone A vs. B: Does localization or association explain isomer-specific toxicity?
title_short Mycolactone A vs. B: Does localization or association explain isomer-specific toxicity?
title_sort mycolactone a vs. b: does localization or association explain isomer-specific toxicity?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10245786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37292660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.19.541532
work_keys_str_mv AT nguyenjohndm mycolactoneavsbdoeslocalizationorassociationexplainisomerspecifictoxicity
AT dahoragabrielca mycolactoneavsbdoeslocalizationorassociationexplainisomerspecifictoxicity
AT swansonjessicamj mycolactoneavsbdoeslocalizationorassociationexplainisomerspecifictoxicity