Cargando…

The impact of flavored e-cigarette bans on e-cigarette use in three US states

INTRODUCTION: Beginning in 2019, several U.S. states implemented temporary or permanent bans on the sale of flavored e-cigarettes. This study examined the impact of flavor bans on adult e-cigarette use in Washington, New Jersey, and New York. METHODS: Adults who used e-cigarettes at least once a wee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Yong, Lindblom, Eric N., Ward, Kenneth D., Salloum, Ramzi G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10246123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37292701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.19.23290249
_version_ 1785054982534332416
author Yang, Yong
Lindblom, Eric N.
Ward, Kenneth D.
Salloum, Ramzi G.
author_facet Yang, Yong
Lindblom, Eric N.
Ward, Kenneth D.
Salloum, Ramzi G.
author_sort Yang, Yong
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Beginning in 2019, several U.S. states implemented temporary or permanent bans on the sale of flavored e-cigarettes. This study examined the impact of flavor bans on adult e-cigarette use in Washington, New Jersey, and New York. METHODS: Adults who used e-cigarettes at least once a week before the flavor bans were recruited online. Respondents reported their e-cigarette use, primarily used flavor, and ways of obtaining e-cigarettes before and after the bans. Descriptive statistics and multinomial logistic regression models were applied. RESULTS: After the ban, 8.1% of respondents (N=1624) quit using e-cigarettes, those primarily used banned menthol or other flavors declined from 74.4% to 50.8, those using tobacco-flavored declined from 20.1% to 15.6%, and those using non-flavored increased from 5.4% to 25.4%. More frequent e-cigarette use and smoking cigarettes were associated with being less likely to quit e-cigarettes and more likely to use banned flavors. Of those primarily using banned flavors, 45.1% obtained e-cigarettes from in-state stores, 31.2% from out-of-state stores, 32% from friends, family, or others, 25.5% from Internet/mail sellers, 5.2% from illegal sellers, 4.2% mixed flavored e-liquids themselves, and 6.9% stocked up on e-cigarettes before the ban. CONCLUSIONS: Most respondents continued to use e-cigarettes with banned flavors post-ban. Compliance of local retailers with the ban was not high, and many respondents obtained banned-flavor e-cigarettes through legal channels. However, the significant increase in the use of non-flavored e-cigarettes post-ban suggests that these may serve as a viable alternative among those who used previously used banned or tobacco flavors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10246123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102461232023-06-08 The impact of flavored e-cigarette bans on e-cigarette use in three US states Yang, Yong Lindblom, Eric N. Ward, Kenneth D. Salloum, Ramzi G. medRxiv Article INTRODUCTION: Beginning in 2019, several U.S. states implemented temporary or permanent bans on the sale of flavored e-cigarettes. This study examined the impact of flavor bans on adult e-cigarette use in Washington, New Jersey, and New York. METHODS: Adults who used e-cigarettes at least once a week before the flavor bans were recruited online. Respondents reported their e-cigarette use, primarily used flavor, and ways of obtaining e-cigarettes before and after the bans. Descriptive statistics and multinomial logistic regression models were applied. RESULTS: After the ban, 8.1% of respondents (N=1624) quit using e-cigarettes, those primarily used banned menthol or other flavors declined from 74.4% to 50.8, those using tobacco-flavored declined from 20.1% to 15.6%, and those using non-flavored increased from 5.4% to 25.4%. More frequent e-cigarette use and smoking cigarettes were associated with being less likely to quit e-cigarettes and more likely to use banned flavors. Of those primarily using banned flavors, 45.1% obtained e-cigarettes from in-state stores, 31.2% from out-of-state stores, 32% from friends, family, or others, 25.5% from Internet/mail sellers, 5.2% from illegal sellers, 4.2% mixed flavored e-liquids themselves, and 6.9% stocked up on e-cigarettes before the ban. CONCLUSIONS: Most respondents continued to use e-cigarettes with banned flavors post-ban. Compliance of local retailers with the ban was not high, and many respondents obtained banned-flavor e-cigarettes through legal channels. However, the significant increase in the use of non-flavored e-cigarettes post-ban suggests that these may serve as a viable alternative among those who used previously used banned or tobacco flavors. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10246123/ /pubmed/37292701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.19.23290249 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
spellingShingle Article
Yang, Yong
Lindblom, Eric N.
Ward, Kenneth D.
Salloum, Ramzi G.
The impact of flavored e-cigarette bans on e-cigarette use in three US states
title The impact of flavored e-cigarette bans on e-cigarette use in three US states
title_full The impact of flavored e-cigarette bans on e-cigarette use in three US states
title_fullStr The impact of flavored e-cigarette bans on e-cigarette use in three US states
title_full_unstemmed The impact of flavored e-cigarette bans on e-cigarette use in three US states
title_short The impact of flavored e-cigarette bans on e-cigarette use in three US states
title_sort impact of flavored e-cigarette bans on e-cigarette use in three us states
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10246123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37292701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.19.23290249
work_keys_str_mv AT yangyong theimpactofflavoredecigarettebansonecigaretteuseinthreeusstates
AT lindblomericn theimpactofflavoredecigarettebansonecigaretteuseinthreeusstates
AT wardkennethd theimpactofflavoredecigarettebansonecigaretteuseinthreeusstates
AT salloumramzig theimpactofflavoredecigarettebansonecigaretteuseinthreeusstates
AT yangyong impactofflavoredecigarettebansonecigaretteuseinthreeusstates
AT lindblomericn impactofflavoredecigarettebansonecigaretteuseinthreeusstates
AT wardkennethd impactofflavoredecigarettebansonecigaretteuseinthreeusstates
AT salloumramzig impactofflavoredecigarettebansonecigaretteuseinthreeusstates