Cargando…

Evaluation of the Ghana Heart Initiative - Design and Rationale of a Pragmatic Mixed-Methods Study from Diverse Perspectives: A Study Protocol

BACKGROUND: Rigorous evaluations of health system interventions to strengthen hypertension and cardiovascular disease (CVD) care remain scarce in sub-Saharan Africa. This study aims to evaluate the reach, effectiveness, adoption / acceptability, implementation fidelity, cost, and sustainability of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Kavita, Otchi, Elom, Shah-Rohlfs, Rupal, Udofia, Emilia, Louis, Valérie R., Adomako, Isaac, Hagan-Seneadza, Nana Ayegua, Herzhauser, Nikias, Owusu, Afua Boatemaa, Tetteh, John, DeGraft-Amoah, Daniel, Kallson, Eugene, Winkler, Volker Franz, Yawson, Alfred Edwin, De Allegri, Manuela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Journal Experts 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10246241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37292696
http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2893313/v1
_version_ 1785054993804427264
author Singh, Kavita
Otchi, Elom
Shah-Rohlfs, Rupal
Udofia, Emilia
Louis, Valérie R.
Adomako, Isaac
Hagan-Seneadza, Nana Ayegua
Herzhauser, Nikias
Owusu, Afua Boatemaa
Tetteh, John
DeGraft-Amoah, Daniel
Kallson, Eugene
Winkler, Volker Franz
Yawson, Alfred Edwin
De Allegri, Manuela
author_facet Singh, Kavita
Otchi, Elom
Shah-Rohlfs, Rupal
Udofia, Emilia
Louis, Valérie R.
Adomako, Isaac
Hagan-Seneadza, Nana Ayegua
Herzhauser, Nikias
Owusu, Afua Boatemaa
Tetteh, John
DeGraft-Amoah, Daniel
Kallson, Eugene
Winkler, Volker Franz
Yawson, Alfred Edwin
De Allegri, Manuela
author_sort Singh, Kavita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rigorous evaluations of health system interventions to strengthen hypertension and cardiovascular disease (CVD) care remain scarce in sub-Saharan Africa. This study aims to evaluate the reach, effectiveness, adoption / acceptability, implementation fidelity, cost, and sustainability of the Ghana Heart Initiative (GHI), a multicomponent supply-side intervention to improve cardiovascular health in Ghana. METHODS: This study adopts a mixed- and multi-methods design comparing the effects of the GHI in 42 intervention health facilities (i.e. primary, secondary and tertiary) in the Greater Accra Region versus 56 control health facilities in the Central and Western Regions. The evaluation design is guided by the RE-AIM framework underpinned by the WHO health systems building blocks framework, integrated by the Institute of Medicine’s six dimensions of health care quality: safe, effective, patient-centered, timely, effi cient, equitable. The assessment tools include: (i) a health facility survey, (ii) a healthcare provider survey assessing the knowledge, attitudes, and practices on hypertension and CVD management, (iii) a patient exit survey, (iv) an outpatient and in-patient medical record review and (v) qualitative interviews with patients and various health system stakeholders to understand the barriers and facilitators around the implementation of the GHI. In addition to primary data collection, the study also relies on secondary routine health system data, i.e., the District Health Information Management System to conduct an interrupted time series analysis using monthly counts for relevant hypertension and CVD specific indicators as outcomes. The primary outcome measures are performance of health service delivery indicators, input, process and outcome of care indicators (including screening of hypertension, newly diagnosed hypertension, prescription of guideline directed medical therapy, and satisfaction with service received and acceptability) between the intervention and control facilities. Lastly, an economic evaluation and budget impact analysis is planned to inform the nationwide scale-up of the GHI. DISCUSSION: This study will generate policy-relevant data on the reach, effectiveness, implementation fidelity, adoption / acceptability, and sustainability of the GHI, and provide insights on the costs and budget-impacts to inform nation-wide scale-up to expand the GHI to other regions across Ghana and offer lessons to other low- and middle-income countries settings as well. RIDIE REGISTRATION NUMBER: RIDIE-STUDY-ID-6375e5614fd49 (https://ridie.3ieimpact.org/index.php).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10246241
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Journal Experts
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102462412023-06-08 Evaluation of the Ghana Heart Initiative - Design and Rationale of a Pragmatic Mixed-Methods Study from Diverse Perspectives: A Study Protocol Singh, Kavita Otchi, Elom Shah-Rohlfs, Rupal Udofia, Emilia Louis, Valérie R. Adomako, Isaac Hagan-Seneadza, Nana Ayegua Herzhauser, Nikias Owusu, Afua Boatemaa Tetteh, John DeGraft-Amoah, Daniel Kallson, Eugene Winkler, Volker Franz Yawson, Alfred Edwin De Allegri, Manuela Res Sq Article BACKGROUND: Rigorous evaluations of health system interventions to strengthen hypertension and cardiovascular disease (CVD) care remain scarce in sub-Saharan Africa. This study aims to evaluate the reach, effectiveness, adoption / acceptability, implementation fidelity, cost, and sustainability of the Ghana Heart Initiative (GHI), a multicomponent supply-side intervention to improve cardiovascular health in Ghana. METHODS: This study adopts a mixed- and multi-methods design comparing the effects of the GHI in 42 intervention health facilities (i.e. primary, secondary and tertiary) in the Greater Accra Region versus 56 control health facilities in the Central and Western Regions. The evaluation design is guided by the RE-AIM framework underpinned by the WHO health systems building blocks framework, integrated by the Institute of Medicine’s six dimensions of health care quality: safe, effective, patient-centered, timely, effi cient, equitable. The assessment tools include: (i) a health facility survey, (ii) a healthcare provider survey assessing the knowledge, attitudes, and practices on hypertension and CVD management, (iii) a patient exit survey, (iv) an outpatient and in-patient medical record review and (v) qualitative interviews with patients and various health system stakeholders to understand the barriers and facilitators around the implementation of the GHI. In addition to primary data collection, the study also relies on secondary routine health system data, i.e., the District Health Information Management System to conduct an interrupted time series analysis using monthly counts for relevant hypertension and CVD specific indicators as outcomes. The primary outcome measures are performance of health service delivery indicators, input, process and outcome of care indicators (including screening of hypertension, newly diagnosed hypertension, prescription of guideline directed medical therapy, and satisfaction with service received and acceptability) between the intervention and control facilities. Lastly, an economic evaluation and budget impact analysis is planned to inform the nationwide scale-up of the GHI. DISCUSSION: This study will generate policy-relevant data on the reach, effectiveness, implementation fidelity, adoption / acceptability, and sustainability of the GHI, and provide insights on the costs and budget-impacts to inform nation-wide scale-up to expand the GHI to other regions across Ghana and offer lessons to other low- and middle-income countries settings as well. RIDIE REGISTRATION NUMBER: RIDIE-STUDY-ID-6375e5614fd49 (https://ridie.3ieimpact.org/index.php). American Journal Experts 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10246241/ /pubmed/37292696 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2893313/v1 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Article
Singh, Kavita
Otchi, Elom
Shah-Rohlfs, Rupal
Udofia, Emilia
Louis, Valérie R.
Adomako, Isaac
Hagan-Seneadza, Nana Ayegua
Herzhauser, Nikias
Owusu, Afua Boatemaa
Tetteh, John
DeGraft-Amoah, Daniel
Kallson, Eugene
Winkler, Volker Franz
Yawson, Alfred Edwin
De Allegri, Manuela
Evaluation of the Ghana Heart Initiative - Design and Rationale of a Pragmatic Mixed-Methods Study from Diverse Perspectives: A Study Protocol
title Evaluation of the Ghana Heart Initiative - Design and Rationale of a Pragmatic Mixed-Methods Study from Diverse Perspectives: A Study Protocol
title_full Evaluation of the Ghana Heart Initiative - Design and Rationale of a Pragmatic Mixed-Methods Study from Diverse Perspectives: A Study Protocol
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Ghana Heart Initiative - Design and Rationale of a Pragmatic Mixed-Methods Study from Diverse Perspectives: A Study Protocol
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Ghana Heart Initiative - Design and Rationale of a Pragmatic Mixed-Methods Study from Diverse Perspectives: A Study Protocol
title_short Evaluation of the Ghana Heart Initiative - Design and Rationale of a Pragmatic Mixed-Methods Study from Diverse Perspectives: A Study Protocol
title_sort evaluation of the ghana heart initiative - design and rationale of a pragmatic mixed-methods study from diverse perspectives: a study protocol
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10246241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37292696
http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2893313/v1
work_keys_str_mv AT singhkavita evaluationoftheghanaheartinitiativedesignandrationaleofapragmaticmixedmethodsstudyfromdiverseperspectivesastudyprotocol
AT otchielom evaluationoftheghanaheartinitiativedesignandrationaleofapragmaticmixedmethodsstudyfromdiverseperspectivesastudyprotocol
AT shahrohlfsrupal evaluationoftheghanaheartinitiativedesignandrationaleofapragmaticmixedmethodsstudyfromdiverseperspectivesastudyprotocol
AT udofiaemilia evaluationoftheghanaheartinitiativedesignandrationaleofapragmaticmixedmethodsstudyfromdiverseperspectivesastudyprotocol
AT louisvalerier evaluationoftheghanaheartinitiativedesignandrationaleofapragmaticmixedmethodsstudyfromdiverseperspectivesastudyprotocol
AT adomakoisaac evaluationoftheghanaheartinitiativedesignandrationaleofapragmaticmixedmethodsstudyfromdiverseperspectivesastudyprotocol
AT haganseneadzananaayegua evaluationoftheghanaheartinitiativedesignandrationaleofapragmaticmixedmethodsstudyfromdiverseperspectivesastudyprotocol
AT herzhausernikias evaluationoftheghanaheartinitiativedesignandrationaleofapragmaticmixedmethodsstudyfromdiverseperspectivesastudyprotocol
AT owusuafuaboatemaa evaluationoftheghanaheartinitiativedesignandrationaleofapragmaticmixedmethodsstudyfromdiverseperspectivesastudyprotocol
AT tettehjohn evaluationoftheghanaheartinitiativedesignandrationaleofapragmaticmixedmethodsstudyfromdiverseperspectivesastudyprotocol
AT degraftamoahdaniel evaluationoftheghanaheartinitiativedesignandrationaleofapragmaticmixedmethodsstudyfromdiverseperspectivesastudyprotocol
AT kallsoneugene evaluationoftheghanaheartinitiativedesignandrationaleofapragmaticmixedmethodsstudyfromdiverseperspectivesastudyprotocol
AT winklervolkerfranz evaluationoftheghanaheartinitiativedesignandrationaleofapragmaticmixedmethodsstudyfromdiverseperspectivesastudyprotocol
AT yawsonalfrededwin evaluationoftheghanaheartinitiativedesignandrationaleofapragmaticmixedmethodsstudyfromdiverseperspectivesastudyprotocol
AT deallegrimanuela evaluationoftheghanaheartinitiativedesignandrationaleofapragmaticmixedmethodsstudyfromdiverseperspectivesastudyprotocol