Cargando…
Evaluation of the Ghana Heart Initiative - Design and Rationale of a Pragmatic Mixed-Methods Study from Diverse Perspectives: A Study Protocol
BACKGROUND: Rigorous evaluations of health system interventions to strengthen hypertension and cardiovascular disease (CVD) care remain scarce in sub-Saharan Africa. This study aims to evaluate the reach, effectiveness, adoption / acceptability, implementation fidelity, cost, and sustainability of t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Journal Experts
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10246241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37292696 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2893313/v1 |
_version_ | 1785054993804427264 |
---|---|
author | Singh, Kavita Otchi, Elom Shah-Rohlfs, Rupal Udofia, Emilia Louis, Valérie R. Adomako, Isaac Hagan-Seneadza, Nana Ayegua Herzhauser, Nikias Owusu, Afua Boatemaa Tetteh, John DeGraft-Amoah, Daniel Kallson, Eugene Winkler, Volker Franz Yawson, Alfred Edwin De Allegri, Manuela |
author_facet | Singh, Kavita Otchi, Elom Shah-Rohlfs, Rupal Udofia, Emilia Louis, Valérie R. Adomako, Isaac Hagan-Seneadza, Nana Ayegua Herzhauser, Nikias Owusu, Afua Boatemaa Tetteh, John DeGraft-Amoah, Daniel Kallson, Eugene Winkler, Volker Franz Yawson, Alfred Edwin De Allegri, Manuela |
author_sort | Singh, Kavita |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Rigorous evaluations of health system interventions to strengthen hypertension and cardiovascular disease (CVD) care remain scarce in sub-Saharan Africa. This study aims to evaluate the reach, effectiveness, adoption / acceptability, implementation fidelity, cost, and sustainability of the Ghana Heart Initiative (GHI), a multicomponent supply-side intervention to improve cardiovascular health in Ghana. METHODS: This study adopts a mixed- and multi-methods design comparing the effects of the GHI in 42 intervention health facilities (i.e. primary, secondary and tertiary) in the Greater Accra Region versus 56 control health facilities in the Central and Western Regions. The evaluation design is guided by the RE-AIM framework underpinned by the WHO health systems building blocks framework, integrated by the Institute of Medicine’s six dimensions of health care quality: safe, effective, patient-centered, timely, effi cient, equitable. The assessment tools include: (i) a health facility survey, (ii) a healthcare provider survey assessing the knowledge, attitudes, and practices on hypertension and CVD management, (iii) a patient exit survey, (iv) an outpatient and in-patient medical record review and (v) qualitative interviews with patients and various health system stakeholders to understand the barriers and facilitators around the implementation of the GHI. In addition to primary data collection, the study also relies on secondary routine health system data, i.e., the District Health Information Management System to conduct an interrupted time series analysis using monthly counts for relevant hypertension and CVD specific indicators as outcomes. The primary outcome measures are performance of health service delivery indicators, input, process and outcome of care indicators (including screening of hypertension, newly diagnosed hypertension, prescription of guideline directed medical therapy, and satisfaction with service received and acceptability) between the intervention and control facilities. Lastly, an economic evaluation and budget impact analysis is planned to inform the nationwide scale-up of the GHI. DISCUSSION: This study will generate policy-relevant data on the reach, effectiveness, implementation fidelity, adoption / acceptability, and sustainability of the GHI, and provide insights on the costs and budget-impacts to inform nation-wide scale-up to expand the GHI to other regions across Ghana and offer lessons to other low- and middle-income countries settings as well. RIDIE REGISTRATION NUMBER: RIDIE-STUDY-ID-6375e5614fd49 (https://ridie.3ieimpact.org/index.php). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10246241 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Journal Experts |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102462412023-06-08 Evaluation of the Ghana Heart Initiative - Design and Rationale of a Pragmatic Mixed-Methods Study from Diverse Perspectives: A Study Protocol Singh, Kavita Otchi, Elom Shah-Rohlfs, Rupal Udofia, Emilia Louis, Valérie R. Adomako, Isaac Hagan-Seneadza, Nana Ayegua Herzhauser, Nikias Owusu, Afua Boatemaa Tetteh, John DeGraft-Amoah, Daniel Kallson, Eugene Winkler, Volker Franz Yawson, Alfred Edwin De Allegri, Manuela Res Sq Article BACKGROUND: Rigorous evaluations of health system interventions to strengthen hypertension and cardiovascular disease (CVD) care remain scarce in sub-Saharan Africa. This study aims to evaluate the reach, effectiveness, adoption / acceptability, implementation fidelity, cost, and sustainability of the Ghana Heart Initiative (GHI), a multicomponent supply-side intervention to improve cardiovascular health in Ghana. METHODS: This study adopts a mixed- and multi-methods design comparing the effects of the GHI in 42 intervention health facilities (i.e. primary, secondary and tertiary) in the Greater Accra Region versus 56 control health facilities in the Central and Western Regions. The evaluation design is guided by the RE-AIM framework underpinned by the WHO health systems building blocks framework, integrated by the Institute of Medicine’s six dimensions of health care quality: safe, effective, patient-centered, timely, effi cient, equitable. The assessment tools include: (i) a health facility survey, (ii) a healthcare provider survey assessing the knowledge, attitudes, and practices on hypertension and CVD management, (iii) a patient exit survey, (iv) an outpatient and in-patient medical record review and (v) qualitative interviews with patients and various health system stakeholders to understand the barriers and facilitators around the implementation of the GHI. In addition to primary data collection, the study also relies on secondary routine health system data, i.e., the District Health Information Management System to conduct an interrupted time series analysis using monthly counts for relevant hypertension and CVD specific indicators as outcomes. The primary outcome measures are performance of health service delivery indicators, input, process and outcome of care indicators (including screening of hypertension, newly diagnosed hypertension, prescription of guideline directed medical therapy, and satisfaction with service received and acceptability) between the intervention and control facilities. Lastly, an economic evaluation and budget impact analysis is planned to inform the nationwide scale-up of the GHI. DISCUSSION: This study will generate policy-relevant data on the reach, effectiveness, implementation fidelity, adoption / acceptability, and sustainability of the GHI, and provide insights on the costs and budget-impacts to inform nation-wide scale-up to expand the GHI to other regions across Ghana and offer lessons to other low- and middle-income countries settings as well. RIDIE REGISTRATION NUMBER: RIDIE-STUDY-ID-6375e5614fd49 (https://ridie.3ieimpact.org/index.php). American Journal Experts 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10246241/ /pubmed/37292696 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2893313/v1 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Article Singh, Kavita Otchi, Elom Shah-Rohlfs, Rupal Udofia, Emilia Louis, Valérie R. Adomako, Isaac Hagan-Seneadza, Nana Ayegua Herzhauser, Nikias Owusu, Afua Boatemaa Tetteh, John DeGraft-Amoah, Daniel Kallson, Eugene Winkler, Volker Franz Yawson, Alfred Edwin De Allegri, Manuela Evaluation of the Ghana Heart Initiative - Design and Rationale of a Pragmatic Mixed-Methods Study from Diverse Perspectives: A Study Protocol |
title | Evaluation of the Ghana Heart Initiative - Design and Rationale of a Pragmatic Mixed-Methods Study from Diverse Perspectives: A Study Protocol |
title_full | Evaluation of the Ghana Heart Initiative - Design and Rationale of a Pragmatic Mixed-Methods Study from Diverse Perspectives: A Study Protocol |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the Ghana Heart Initiative - Design and Rationale of a Pragmatic Mixed-Methods Study from Diverse Perspectives: A Study Protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the Ghana Heart Initiative - Design and Rationale of a Pragmatic Mixed-Methods Study from Diverse Perspectives: A Study Protocol |
title_short | Evaluation of the Ghana Heart Initiative - Design and Rationale of a Pragmatic Mixed-Methods Study from Diverse Perspectives: A Study Protocol |
title_sort | evaluation of the ghana heart initiative - design and rationale of a pragmatic mixed-methods study from diverse perspectives: a study protocol |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10246241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37292696 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2893313/v1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singhkavita evaluationoftheghanaheartinitiativedesignandrationaleofapragmaticmixedmethodsstudyfromdiverseperspectivesastudyprotocol AT otchielom evaluationoftheghanaheartinitiativedesignandrationaleofapragmaticmixedmethodsstudyfromdiverseperspectivesastudyprotocol AT shahrohlfsrupal evaluationoftheghanaheartinitiativedesignandrationaleofapragmaticmixedmethodsstudyfromdiverseperspectivesastudyprotocol AT udofiaemilia evaluationoftheghanaheartinitiativedesignandrationaleofapragmaticmixedmethodsstudyfromdiverseperspectivesastudyprotocol AT louisvalerier evaluationoftheghanaheartinitiativedesignandrationaleofapragmaticmixedmethodsstudyfromdiverseperspectivesastudyprotocol AT adomakoisaac evaluationoftheghanaheartinitiativedesignandrationaleofapragmaticmixedmethodsstudyfromdiverseperspectivesastudyprotocol AT haganseneadzananaayegua evaluationoftheghanaheartinitiativedesignandrationaleofapragmaticmixedmethodsstudyfromdiverseperspectivesastudyprotocol AT herzhausernikias evaluationoftheghanaheartinitiativedesignandrationaleofapragmaticmixedmethodsstudyfromdiverseperspectivesastudyprotocol AT owusuafuaboatemaa evaluationoftheghanaheartinitiativedesignandrationaleofapragmaticmixedmethodsstudyfromdiverseperspectivesastudyprotocol AT tettehjohn evaluationoftheghanaheartinitiativedesignandrationaleofapragmaticmixedmethodsstudyfromdiverseperspectivesastudyprotocol AT degraftamoahdaniel evaluationoftheghanaheartinitiativedesignandrationaleofapragmaticmixedmethodsstudyfromdiverseperspectivesastudyprotocol AT kallsoneugene evaluationoftheghanaheartinitiativedesignandrationaleofapragmaticmixedmethodsstudyfromdiverseperspectivesastudyprotocol AT winklervolkerfranz evaluationoftheghanaheartinitiativedesignandrationaleofapragmaticmixedmethodsstudyfromdiverseperspectivesastudyprotocol AT yawsonalfrededwin evaluationoftheghanaheartinitiativedesignandrationaleofapragmaticmixedmethodsstudyfromdiverseperspectivesastudyprotocol AT deallegrimanuela evaluationoftheghanaheartinitiativedesignandrationaleofapragmaticmixedmethodsstudyfromdiverseperspectivesastudyprotocol |