Cargando…

Pediatric basic course goes virtual: transition from face to face to hybrid learning in pediatric critical care

BACKGROUND: To explore the impact of the transition from a traditional face-to-face course delivering essential contents in pediatric critical care to a hybrid format consisting of an online pre-course self-directed learning, an online facilitated discussion, and a face-to-face edition. METHODS: Att...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zanin, Anna, Caragol, Angela Aramburo, Tortorolo, Luca, Patui, Michele, Pedrini, Beatrice, Brierley, Joe, Lister, Bruce, Cogo, Paola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10246866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37287003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13052-023-01461-4
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: To explore the impact of the transition from a traditional face-to-face course delivering essential contents in pediatric critical care to a hybrid format consisting of an online pre-course self-directed learning, an online facilitated discussion, and a face-to-face edition. METHODS: Attendees and faculty were surveyed after the face-to-face course and the hybrid version to evaluate the effectiveness and satisfaction of participants with the course. RESULTS: Fifty-seven students attended multiple formats of the Pediatric Basic Course between January 2020 and October 2021 in Udine, Italy. We compared course evaluation data from the 29 attendees of the face-to-face course with the 28 of the hybrid edition. Data collected included participant demographics, participant self-assessed pre and post-course ‘‘confidence’’ with a range of pediatric intensive care-related activities, and their satisfaction with elements of the course. There were no statistical differences in participant demographics or pre and post-course confidence scores. Overall satisfaction with the face-to-face course was marginally higher, 4.59 vs. 4.25/5, but did not reach significance. Pre-recorded lectures which could be viewed several times, were highlighted as a positive for the hybrid course. Residents found no significant differences comparing the two courses in rating the lectures and the technical skills stations. Hybrid course facilities (online platform and uploaded material) were reported to be clear, accessible, and valuable by 87% of attendees. After six months, they still find the course relevant to their clinical practice (75%). Candidates considered the respiratory failure and mechanical ventilation modules the most relevant modules. CONCLUSIONS: The Pediatric Basic Course helps residents strengthen their learning and identify areas to improve their knowledge. Both face-to-face and hybrid model versions of the course improved attendees’ knowledge and perceived confidence in managing the critically ill child. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13052-023-01461-4.