Cargando…
Implant Surface Topography Following Different Laser Treatments: An In Vitro Study
Background Although dental implants have demonstrated very high success rates, they are susceptible to complications such as peri-implantitis that can lead to failure. Methods Twenty implants with surfaces grit-blasted using hydroxyapatite and acid-etched were randomly divided into four groups (five...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10246922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37292557 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38731 |
_version_ | 1785055132171370496 |
---|---|
author | Khalil, Marwa I Sakr, Haitham |
author_facet | Khalil, Marwa I Sakr, Haitham |
author_sort | Khalil, Marwa I |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background Although dental implants have demonstrated very high success rates, they are susceptible to complications such as peri-implantitis that can lead to failure. Methods Twenty implants with surfaces grit-blasted using hydroxyapatite and acid-etched were randomly divided into four groups (five in each group). Three groups were assigned to laser treatments: Group I (erbium, chromium-doped: yttrium, scandium, gallium, and garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser), Group II (650-nm diode laser), and Group III (808-nm diode), and one control group, Group IV. The surface roughness parameters (roughness average(Ra) and root mean square roughness(Rq)) were measured using a non-contact optical profilometer and scanning electron microscope to evaluate the surface topography after the laser treatments. Results Significant differences were observed between the laser groups regarding the surface roughness Ra (3.56±0.26, 3.45±0.19, 3.77±0.42, p(c)=0.0004, p(e)=0.0002, p(f)=0.001) and Rq values (4.49±0.34, 4.35±0.26, 4.72±0.56, p(c)=0.0007, p(e)=0.0006, p(f)=0.002) and the control group (2.81±0.10; 3.57±0.19). However, no significant difference was observed between the different laser treatment modalities. The scanning electron microscope images revealed some morphological changes on the implant surfaces following laser treatment, but no melted morphology was observed. Conclusions The application of Er,Cr:YSGG, 650-nm diode laser, and 808-nm diode did not show melting changes on implant topography. However, some increase in surface roughness was detected. Further studies are recommended to assess the effectiveness of these laser settings on bacterial reduction and osseointegration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10246922 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102469222023-06-08 Implant Surface Topography Following Different Laser Treatments: An In Vitro Study Khalil, Marwa I Sakr, Haitham Cureus Healthcare Technology Background Although dental implants have demonstrated very high success rates, they are susceptible to complications such as peri-implantitis that can lead to failure. Methods Twenty implants with surfaces grit-blasted using hydroxyapatite and acid-etched were randomly divided into four groups (five in each group). Three groups were assigned to laser treatments: Group I (erbium, chromium-doped: yttrium, scandium, gallium, and garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser), Group II (650-nm diode laser), and Group III (808-nm diode), and one control group, Group IV. The surface roughness parameters (roughness average(Ra) and root mean square roughness(Rq)) were measured using a non-contact optical profilometer and scanning electron microscope to evaluate the surface topography after the laser treatments. Results Significant differences were observed between the laser groups regarding the surface roughness Ra (3.56±0.26, 3.45±0.19, 3.77±0.42, p(c)=0.0004, p(e)=0.0002, p(f)=0.001) and Rq values (4.49±0.34, 4.35±0.26, 4.72±0.56, p(c)=0.0007, p(e)=0.0006, p(f)=0.002) and the control group (2.81±0.10; 3.57±0.19). However, no significant difference was observed between the different laser treatment modalities. The scanning electron microscope images revealed some morphological changes on the implant surfaces following laser treatment, but no melted morphology was observed. Conclusions The application of Er,Cr:YSGG, 650-nm diode laser, and 808-nm diode did not show melting changes on implant topography. However, some increase in surface roughness was detected. Further studies are recommended to assess the effectiveness of these laser settings on bacterial reduction and osseointegration. Cureus 2023-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10246922/ /pubmed/37292557 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38731 Text en Copyright © 2023, Khalil et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Healthcare Technology Khalil, Marwa I Sakr, Haitham Implant Surface Topography Following Different Laser Treatments: An In Vitro Study |
title | Implant Surface Topography Following Different Laser Treatments: An In Vitro Study |
title_full | Implant Surface Topography Following Different Laser Treatments: An In Vitro Study |
title_fullStr | Implant Surface Topography Following Different Laser Treatments: An In Vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Implant Surface Topography Following Different Laser Treatments: An In Vitro Study |
title_short | Implant Surface Topography Following Different Laser Treatments: An In Vitro Study |
title_sort | implant surface topography following different laser treatments: an in vitro study |
topic | Healthcare Technology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10246922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37292557 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38731 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khalilmarwai implantsurfacetopographyfollowingdifferentlasertreatmentsaninvitrostudy AT sakrhaitham implantsurfacetopographyfollowingdifferentlasertreatmentsaninvitrostudy |