Cargando…

Robotic-assisted repair of colovesical anastomosis after Hartmann’s reversal procedure

PURPOSE: Hartmann’s procedure is the resection of the rectosigmoid colon with an end colostomy formation and closure of the anorectal stump (1). Its reversal has a morbidity rate up to 58% (2, 3) with an incidence of fistulae formation of 4.08% (1). Herein, we present a robotic-assisted repair of a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poncel, Jaime, Sayegh, Aref S., Ko, Oliver, Sotelo, Rene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10247229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36515620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.0453
_version_ 1785055152592388096
author Poncel, Jaime
Sayegh, Aref S.
Ko, Oliver
Sotelo, Rene
author_facet Poncel, Jaime
Sayegh, Aref S.
Ko, Oliver
Sotelo, Rene
author_sort Poncel, Jaime
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Hartmann’s procedure is the resection of the rectosigmoid colon with an end colostomy formation and closure of the anorectal stump (1). Its reversal has a morbidity rate up to 58% (2, 3) with an incidence of fistulae formation of 4.08% (1). Herein, we present a robotic-assisted repair of a complex fistula that occurred as complication of Hartmann’s reversal when the stapler was introduced inadvertently through the vaginal canal. PATIENT AND METHODS: Eighty-three-year-old female with past medical history of hysterectomy and ischemic colitis that required colectomy and colostomy placement in December 2020. In March 2022, the patient underwent a colostomy takedown, after which she reported fecaluria, urine leakage per vagina, and recurrent urinary tract infections. Cystoscopy and vaginoscopy revealed a large colovesical fistula, a staple in the bladder trigone, and several staples in the anterior vaginal wall. Robotically, extensive adhesiolysis was performed, the sigmoid was separated from the bladder, and the intact rectal stump was dissected free. The staple from the bladder trigone was removed. Bladder was closed in two layers with 3-0 V-Loc. Colorectal anastomosis was not feasible due to the short length of both ends. Therefore, a permanent colostomy was placed. RESULTS: Operative time was 454min., and estimated blood loss was 100cc. Discharged on postoperative day 4 with a JP drain and a 20Fr Foley catheter. Drain, and Foley were removed on postoperative days 9 and 23, respectively. No postoperative complications were reported. CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted repair represents an effective approach for the management of colovesical fistulae after Hartmann’s reversal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10247229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102472292023-06-08 Robotic-assisted repair of colovesical anastomosis after Hartmann’s reversal procedure Poncel, Jaime Sayegh, Aref S. Ko, Oliver Sotelo, Rene Int Braz J Urol Video Section PURPOSE: Hartmann’s procedure is the resection of the rectosigmoid colon with an end colostomy formation and closure of the anorectal stump (1). Its reversal has a morbidity rate up to 58% (2, 3) with an incidence of fistulae formation of 4.08% (1). Herein, we present a robotic-assisted repair of a complex fistula that occurred as complication of Hartmann’s reversal when the stapler was introduced inadvertently through the vaginal canal. PATIENT AND METHODS: Eighty-three-year-old female with past medical history of hysterectomy and ischemic colitis that required colectomy and colostomy placement in December 2020. In March 2022, the patient underwent a colostomy takedown, after which she reported fecaluria, urine leakage per vagina, and recurrent urinary tract infections. Cystoscopy and vaginoscopy revealed a large colovesical fistula, a staple in the bladder trigone, and several staples in the anterior vaginal wall. Robotically, extensive adhesiolysis was performed, the sigmoid was separated from the bladder, and the intact rectal stump was dissected free. The staple from the bladder trigone was removed. Bladder was closed in two layers with 3-0 V-Loc. Colorectal anastomosis was not feasible due to the short length of both ends. Therefore, a permanent colostomy was placed. RESULTS: Operative time was 454min., and estimated blood loss was 100cc. Discharged on postoperative day 4 with a JP drain and a 20Fr Foley catheter. Drain, and Foley were removed on postoperative days 9 and 23, respectively. No postoperative complications were reported. CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted repair represents an effective approach for the management of colovesical fistulae after Hartmann’s reversal. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2022-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10247229/ /pubmed/36515620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.0453 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Video Section
Poncel, Jaime
Sayegh, Aref S.
Ko, Oliver
Sotelo, Rene
Robotic-assisted repair of colovesical anastomosis after Hartmann’s reversal procedure
title Robotic-assisted repair of colovesical anastomosis after Hartmann’s reversal procedure
title_full Robotic-assisted repair of colovesical anastomosis after Hartmann’s reversal procedure
title_fullStr Robotic-assisted repair of colovesical anastomosis after Hartmann’s reversal procedure
title_full_unstemmed Robotic-assisted repair of colovesical anastomosis after Hartmann’s reversal procedure
title_short Robotic-assisted repair of colovesical anastomosis after Hartmann’s reversal procedure
title_sort robotic-assisted repair of colovesical anastomosis after hartmann’s reversal procedure
topic Video Section
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10247229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36515620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.0453
work_keys_str_mv AT ponceljaime roboticassistedrepairofcolovesicalanastomosisafterhartmannsreversalprocedure
AT sayegharefs roboticassistedrepairofcolovesicalanastomosisafterhartmannsreversalprocedure
AT kooliver roboticassistedrepairofcolovesicalanastomosisafterhartmannsreversalprocedure
AT sotelorene roboticassistedrepairofcolovesicalanastomosisafterhartmannsreversalprocedure