Cargando…
Implementation and outcomes of Hugo(TM) RAS System in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
BACKGROUND: The results and benefits of Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) are already established in the literature. However, new robotic platforms have been released recently in the market and their outcomes are still unknown. In this scenario, our objective is to describe our experienc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10247240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36515619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.9902 |
_version_ | 1785055155332317184 |
---|---|
author | Alfano, Claudia González Moschovas, Marcio Covas Montagne, Vianette Soto, Irela Porter, James Patel, Vipul Ureña, Ruben Bodden, Elias |
author_facet | Alfano, Claudia González Moschovas, Marcio Covas Montagne, Vianette Soto, Irela Porter, James Patel, Vipul Ureña, Ruben Bodden, Elias |
author_sort | Alfano, Claudia González |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The results and benefits of Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) are already established in the literature. However, new robotic platforms have been released recently in the market and their outcomes are still unknown. In this scenario, our objective is to describe our experience implementing the Hugo(TM) RAS robot and report the clinical data of patients who underwent Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed fifteen consecutive patients who underwent RARP with Hugo(TM) RAS System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, USA) from June to October 2021. The patients underwent transperitoneal RARP on lithotomy position, using six trocars (4 robotic trocars and 2 for the assistant). We reported the clinical feasibility and safety of this platform, assessing perioperative data, including complications and early outcomes. Continuous variables were reported as median and interquartile ranges, categorical variables as frequencies and proportions. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: All procedures were safe and feasible with no major complications or conversion. Median operative time was 235 minutes (213-271), and median estimated blood loss was 300ml (100-310). Positive surgical margins were reported in 5 patients (33%). The median hospitalization time was 2 days (2-2), and the median time to remove the foley was 7 days (7-7). On the first appointment four weeks after surgery, all patients had undetectable PSA values, and 61% were continent. CONCLUSIONS: We described preliminary results with safe and feasible procedures performed with Hugo(TM) RAS System robotic platform. The surgeries were successfully executed with acceptable perioperative outcomes, without conversions or major complications. However, as this technology is very recent, further studies with a long-term follow-up are awaited to access postoperative functional and oncological outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10247240 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102472402023-06-08 Implementation and outcomes of Hugo(TM) RAS System in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy Alfano, Claudia González Moschovas, Marcio Covas Montagne, Vianette Soto, Irela Porter, James Patel, Vipul Ureña, Ruben Bodden, Elias Int Braz J Urol Original Article BACKGROUND: The results and benefits of Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) are already established in the literature. However, new robotic platforms have been released recently in the market and their outcomes are still unknown. In this scenario, our objective is to describe our experience implementing the Hugo(TM) RAS robot and report the clinical data of patients who underwent Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed fifteen consecutive patients who underwent RARP with Hugo(TM) RAS System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, USA) from June to October 2021. The patients underwent transperitoneal RARP on lithotomy position, using six trocars (4 robotic trocars and 2 for the assistant). We reported the clinical feasibility and safety of this platform, assessing perioperative data, including complications and early outcomes. Continuous variables were reported as median and interquartile ranges, categorical variables as frequencies and proportions. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: All procedures were safe and feasible with no major complications or conversion. Median operative time was 235 minutes (213-271), and median estimated blood loss was 300ml (100-310). Positive surgical margins were reported in 5 patients (33%). The median hospitalization time was 2 days (2-2), and the median time to remove the foley was 7 days (7-7). On the first appointment four weeks after surgery, all patients had undetectable PSA values, and 61% were continent. CONCLUSIONS: We described preliminary results with safe and feasible procedures performed with Hugo(TM) RAS System robotic platform. The surgeries were successfully executed with acceptable perioperative outcomes, without conversions or major complications. However, as this technology is very recent, further studies with a long-term follow-up are awaited to access postoperative functional and oncological outcomes. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2022-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10247240/ /pubmed/36515619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.9902 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Alfano, Claudia González Moschovas, Marcio Covas Montagne, Vianette Soto, Irela Porter, James Patel, Vipul Ureña, Ruben Bodden, Elias Implementation and outcomes of Hugo(TM) RAS System in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy |
title | Implementation and outcomes of Hugo(TM) RAS System in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy |
title_full | Implementation and outcomes of Hugo(TM) RAS System in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy |
title_fullStr | Implementation and outcomes of Hugo(TM) RAS System in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation and outcomes of Hugo(TM) RAS System in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy |
title_short | Implementation and outcomes of Hugo(TM) RAS System in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy |
title_sort | implementation and outcomes of hugo(tm) ras system in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10247240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36515619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.9902 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alfanoclaudiagonzalez implementationandoutcomesofhugotmrassysteminroboticassistedradicalprostatectomy AT moschovasmarciocovas implementationandoutcomesofhugotmrassysteminroboticassistedradicalprostatectomy AT montagnevianette implementationandoutcomesofhugotmrassysteminroboticassistedradicalprostatectomy AT sotoirela implementationandoutcomesofhugotmrassysteminroboticassistedradicalprostatectomy AT porterjames implementationandoutcomesofhugotmrassysteminroboticassistedradicalprostatectomy AT patelvipul implementationandoutcomesofhugotmrassysteminroboticassistedradicalprostatectomy AT urenaruben implementationandoutcomesofhugotmrassysteminroboticassistedradicalprostatectomy AT boddenelias implementationandoutcomesofhugotmrassysteminroboticassistedradicalprostatectomy |