Cargando…

Implementation and outcomes of Hugo(TM) RAS System in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND: The results and benefits of Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) are already established in the literature. However, new robotic platforms have been released recently in the market and their outcomes are still unknown. In this scenario, our objective is to describe our experienc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alfano, Claudia González, Moschovas, Marcio Covas, Montagne, Vianette, Soto, Irela, Porter, James, Patel, Vipul, Ureña, Ruben, Bodden, Elias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10247240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36515619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.9902
_version_ 1785055155332317184
author Alfano, Claudia González
Moschovas, Marcio Covas
Montagne, Vianette
Soto, Irela
Porter, James
Patel, Vipul
Ureña, Ruben
Bodden, Elias
author_facet Alfano, Claudia González
Moschovas, Marcio Covas
Montagne, Vianette
Soto, Irela
Porter, James
Patel, Vipul
Ureña, Ruben
Bodden, Elias
author_sort Alfano, Claudia González
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The results and benefits of Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) are already established in the literature. However, new robotic platforms have been released recently in the market and their outcomes are still unknown. In this scenario, our objective is to describe our experience implementing the Hugo(TM) RAS robot and report the clinical data of patients who underwent Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed fifteen consecutive patients who underwent RARP with Hugo(TM) RAS System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, USA) from June to October 2021. The patients underwent transperitoneal RARP on lithotomy position, using six trocars (4 robotic trocars and 2 for the assistant). We reported the clinical feasibility and safety of this platform, assessing perioperative data, including complications and early outcomes. Continuous variables were reported as median and interquartile ranges, categorical variables as frequencies and proportions. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: All procedures were safe and feasible with no major complications or conversion. Median operative time was 235 minutes (213-271), and median estimated blood loss was 300ml (100-310). Positive surgical margins were reported in 5 patients (33%). The median hospitalization time was 2 days (2-2), and the median time to remove the foley was 7 days (7-7). On the first appointment four weeks after surgery, all patients had undetectable PSA values, and 61% were continent. CONCLUSIONS: We described preliminary results with safe and feasible procedures performed with Hugo(TM) RAS System robotic platform. The surgeries were successfully executed with acceptable perioperative outcomes, without conversions or major complications. However, as this technology is very recent, further studies with a long-term follow-up are awaited to access postoperative functional and oncological outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10247240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102472402023-06-08 Implementation and outcomes of Hugo(TM) RAS System in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy Alfano, Claudia González Moschovas, Marcio Covas Montagne, Vianette Soto, Irela Porter, James Patel, Vipul Ureña, Ruben Bodden, Elias Int Braz J Urol Original Article BACKGROUND: The results and benefits of Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) are already established in the literature. However, new robotic platforms have been released recently in the market and their outcomes are still unknown. In this scenario, our objective is to describe our experience implementing the Hugo(TM) RAS robot and report the clinical data of patients who underwent Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed fifteen consecutive patients who underwent RARP with Hugo(TM) RAS System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, USA) from June to October 2021. The patients underwent transperitoneal RARP on lithotomy position, using six trocars (4 robotic trocars and 2 for the assistant). We reported the clinical feasibility and safety of this platform, assessing perioperative data, including complications and early outcomes. Continuous variables were reported as median and interquartile ranges, categorical variables as frequencies and proportions. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: All procedures were safe and feasible with no major complications or conversion. Median operative time was 235 minutes (213-271), and median estimated blood loss was 300ml (100-310). Positive surgical margins were reported in 5 patients (33%). The median hospitalization time was 2 days (2-2), and the median time to remove the foley was 7 days (7-7). On the first appointment four weeks after surgery, all patients had undetectable PSA values, and 61% were continent. CONCLUSIONS: We described preliminary results with safe and feasible procedures performed with Hugo(TM) RAS System robotic platform. The surgeries were successfully executed with acceptable perioperative outcomes, without conversions or major complications. However, as this technology is very recent, further studies with a long-term follow-up are awaited to access postoperative functional and oncological outcomes. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2022-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10247240/ /pubmed/36515619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.9902 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Alfano, Claudia González
Moschovas, Marcio Covas
Montagne, Vianette
Soto, Irela
Porter, James
Patel, Vipul
Ureña, Ruben
Bodden, Elias
Implementation and outcomes of Hugo(TM) RAS System in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
title Implementation and outcomes of Hugo(TM) RAS System in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
title_full Implementation and outcomes of Hugo(TM) RAS System in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
title_fullStr Implementation and outcomes of Hugo(TM) RAS System in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed Implementation and outcomes of Hugo(TM) RAS System in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
title_short Implementation and outcomes of Hugo(TM) RAS System in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
title_sort implementation and outcomes of hugo(tm) ras system in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10247240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36515619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.9902
work_keys_str_mv AT alfanoclaudiagonzalez implementationandoutcomesofhugotmrassysteminroboticassistedradicalprostatectomy
AT moschovasmarciocovas implementationandoutcomesofhugotmrassysteminroboticassistedradicalprostatectomy
AT montagnevianette implementationandoutcomesofhugotmrassysteminroboticassistedradicalprostatectomy
AT sotoirela implementationandoutcomesofhugotmrassysteminroboticassistedradicalprostatectomy
AT porterjames implementationandoutcomesofhugotmrassysteminroboticassistedradicalprostatectomy
AT patelvipul implementationandoutcomesofhugotmrassysteminroboticassistedradicalprostatectomy
AT urenaruben implementationandoutcomesofhugotmrassysteminroboticassistedradicalprostatectomy
AT boddenelias implementationandoutcomesofhugotmrassysteminroboticassistedradicalprostatectomy