Cargando…

Impact of New-Onset Conduction Disturbances following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Outcomes: A Single-Center Study

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is known to increase the incidence of conduction disturbances compared to surgical aortic valve replacement; however, there are limited data on the impact and duration of these conduction disturbances on longer term outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: See, Claudia, Wang, Yanting, Huang, Haocheng, Parise, Helen, Yang, Yiping, Tirziu, Daniela, Francese, Dominic P., Papoutsidakis, Nikolaos, Bader, Eric, Kaple, Ryan K., Cleman, Michael, Lansky, Alexandra J., Forrest, John K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10247319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37292113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/5390338
_version_ 1785055173929861120
author See, Claudia
Wang, Yanting
Huang, Haocheng
Parise, Helen
Yang, Yiping
Tirziu, Daniela
Francese, Dominic P.
Papoutsidakis, Nikolaos
Bader, Eric
Kaple, Ryan K.
Cleman, Michael
Lansky, Alexandra J.
Forrest, John K.
author_facet See, Claudia
Wang, Yanting
Huang, Haocheng
Parise, Helen
Yang, Yiping
Tirziu, Daniela
Francese, Dominic P.
Papoutsidakis, Nikolaos
Bader, Eric
Kaple, Ryan K.
Cleman, Michael
Lansky, Alexandra J.
Forrest, John K.
author_sort See, Claudia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is known to increase the incidence of conduction disturbances compared to surgical aortic valve replacement; however, there are limited data on the impact and duration of these conduction disturbances on longer term outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To determine the differential impact of persistent versus nonpersistent new-onset conduction disturbances on TAVR-related complications and outcomes. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective analysis of 927 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR at Yale New Haven Hospital from July 2012 to August 2019. Patients with new-onset conduction disturbances within 7 days following TAVR were selected for this study. Persistent and nonpersistent disturbances were, respectively, defined as persisting or not persisting on all patient ECGs for up to 1.5 years after TAVR or until death. RESULTS: Within 7 days after TAVR, conduction disturbances occurred in 42.3% (392/927) of the patients. Conduction disturbances persisted in 150 (38%) patients and did not persist in 187 (48%) patients, and 55 (14%) patients were excluded for having mixed (both persistent and nonpersistent) disturbances. Compared with nonpersistent disturbances, patients with persistent disturbances were more likely to receive a PPM within 7 days after the TAVR procedure (46.0% versus 4.3%, p < 0.001) and had a greater unadjusted 1-year cardiac-related and all-cause mortality risk (HR 2.54, p=0.044 and HR 1.90, p=0.046, respectively). CONCLUSION: Persistent conduction disturbances were associated with a greater cardiac and all-cause mortality rate at one year following TAVR. Future research should investigate periprocedural factors to reduce persistent conduction disturbances and outcomes beyond one year follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10247319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102473192023-06-08 Impact of New-Onset Conduction Disturbances following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Outcomes: A Single-Center Study See, Claudia Wang, Yanting Huang, Haocheng Parise, Helen Yang, Yiping Tirziu, Daniela Francese, Dominic P. Papoutsidakis, Nikolaos Bader, Eric Kaple, Ryan K. Cleman, Michael Lansky, Alexandra J. Forrest, John K. J Interv Cardiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is known to increase the incidence of conduction disturbances compared to surgical aortic valve replacement; however, there are limited data on the impact and duration of these conduction disturbances on longer term outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To determine the differential impact of persistent versus nonpersistent new-onset conduction disturbances on TAVR-related complications and outcomes. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective analysis of 927 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR at Yale New Haven Hospital from July 2012 to August 2019. Patients with new-onset conduction disturbances within 7 days following TAVR were selected for this study. Persistent and nonpersistent disturbances were, respectively, defined as persisting or not persisting on all patient ECGs for up to 1.5 years after TAVR or until death. RESULTS: Within 7 days after TAVR, conduction disturbances occurred in 42.3% (392/927) of the patients. Conduction disturbances persisted in 150 (38%) patients and did not persist in 187 (48%) patients, and 55 (14%) patients were excluded for having mixed (both persistent and nonpersistent) disturbances. Compared with nonpersistent disturbances, patients with persistent disturbances were more likely to receive a PPM within 7 days after the TAVR procedure (46.0% versus 4.3%, p < 0.001) and had a greater unadjusted 1-year cardiac-related and all-cause mortality risk (HR 2.54, p=0.044 and HR 1.90, p=0.046, respectively). CONCLUSION: Persistent conduction disturbances were associated with a greater cardiac and all-cause mortality rate at one year following TAVR. Future research should investigate periprocedural factors to reduce persistent conduction disturbances and outcomes beyond one year follow-up. Hindawi 2023-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10247319/ /pubmed/37292113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/5390338 Text en Copyright © 2023 Claudia See et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
See, Claudia
Wang, Yanting
Huang, Haocheng
Parise, Helen
Yang, Yiping
Tirziu, Daniela
Francese, Dominic P.
Papoutsidakis, Nikolaos
Bader, Eric
Kaple, Ryan K.
Cleman, Michael
Lansky, Alexandra J.
Forrest, John K.
Impact of New-Onset Conduction Disturbances following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Outcomes: A Single-Center Study
title Impact of New-Onset Conduction Disturbances following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Outcomes: A Single-Center Study
title_full Impact of New-Onset Conduction Disturbances following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Outcomes: A Single-Center Study
title_fullStr Impact of New-Onset Conduction Disturbances following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Outcomes: A Single-Center Study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of New-Onset Conduction Disturbances following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Outcomes: A Single-Center Study
title_short Impact of New-Onset Conduction Disturbances following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Outcomes: A Single-Center Study
title_sort impact of new-onset conduction disturbances following transcatheter aortic valve replacement on outcomes: a single-center study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10247319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37292113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/5390338
work_keys_str_mv AT seeclaudia impactofnewonsetconductiondisturbancesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementonoutcomesasinglecenterstudy
AT wangyanting impactofnewonsetconductiondisturbancesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementonoutcomesasinglecenterstudy
AT huanghaocheng impactofnewonsetconductiondisturbancesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementonoutcomesasinglecenterstudy
AT parisehelen impactofnewonsetconductiondisturbancesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementonoutcomesasinglecenterstudy
AT yangyiping impactofnewonsetconductiondisturbancesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementonoutcomesasinglecenterstudy
AT tirziudaniela impactofnewonsetconductiondisturbancesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementonoutcomesasinglecenterstudy
AT francesedominicp impactofnewonsetconductiondisturbancesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementonoutcomesasinglecenterstudy
AT papoutsidakisnikolaos impactofnewonsetconductiondisturbancesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementonoutcomesasinglecenterstudy
AT badereric impactofnewonsetconductiondisturbancesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementonoutcomesasinglecenterstudy
AT kapleryank impactofnewonsetconductiondisturbancesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementonoutcomesasinglecenterstudy
AT clemanmichael impactofnewonsetconductiondisturbancesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementonoutcomesasinglecenterstudy
AT lanskyalexandraj impactofnewonsetconductiondisturbancesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementonoutcomesasinglecenterstudy
AT forrestjohnk impactofnewonsetconductiondisturbancesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementonoutcomesasinglecenterstudy