Cargando…

Risk of progression following a negative biopsy in prostate cancer active surveillance

BACKGROUND: Currently, follow-up protocols are applied equally to men on active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer (PCa) regardless of findings at their initial follow-up biopsy. To determine whether less intensive follow-up is suitable following negative biopsy findings, we assessed the risk of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beckmann, Kerri, Santaolalla, Aida, Sugimoto, Mikio, Carroll, Peter, Rubio, Jose, Villers, Arnauld, Bjartell, Anders, Morgan, Todd, Dasgupta, Prokar, Van Hemelrijck, Mieke, Elhage, Oussama
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10247354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36008540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-022-00582-x
_version_ 1785055182433812480
author Beckmann, Kerri
Santaolalla, Aida
Sugimoto, Mikio
Carroll, Peter
Rubio, Jose
Villers, Arnauld
Bjartell, Anders
Morgan, Todd
Dasgupta, Prokar
Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
Elhage, Oussama
author_facet Beckmann, Kerri
Santaolalla, Aida
Sugimoto, Mikio
Carroll, Peter
Rubio, Jose
Villers, Arnauld
Bjartell, Anders
Morgan, Todd
Dasgupta, Prokar
Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
Elhage, Oussama
author_sort Beckmann, Kerri
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Currently, follow-up protocols are applied equally to men on active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer (PCa) regardless of findings at their initial follow-up biopsy. To determine whether less intensive follow-up is suitable following negative biopsy findings, we assessed the risk of converting to active treatment, any subsequent upgrading, volume progression (>33% positive cores), and serious upgrading (grade group >2) for negative compared with positive findings on initial follow-up biopsy. METHODS: 13,161 men from 24 centres participating in the Global Action Plan Active Surveillance Prostate Cancer [GAP3] consortium database, with baseline grade group ≤2, PSA ≤ 20 ng/mL, cT-stage 1–2, diagnosed after 1995, and ≥1 follow-up biopsy, were included in this study. Risk of converting to treatment was assessed using multivariable mixed-effects survival regression. Odds of volume progression, any upgrading and serious upgrading were assessed using mix-effects binary logistic regression for men with ≥2 surveillance biopsies. RESULTS: 27% of the cohort (n = 3590) had no evidence of PCa at their initial biopsy. Over 50% of subsequent biopsies in this group were also negative. A negative initial biopsy was associated with lower risk of conversion (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42–0.49), subsequent upgrading (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.52; 95%CI: 0.45–0.62) and serious upgrading (OR: 0.74; 95%CI: 0.59–92). Radiological progression was not assessed due to limited imaging data. CONCLUSION: Despite heterogeneity in follow-up schedules, findings from this global study indicated reduced risk of converting to treatment, volume progression, any upgrading and serious upgrading among men whose initial biopsy findings were negative compared with positive. Given the low risk of progression and high likelihood of further negative biopsy findings, consideration should be given to decreasing follow-up intensity for this group to reduce unnecessary invasive biopsies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10247354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102473542023-06-09 Risk of progression following a negative biopsy in prostate cancer active surveillance Beckmann, Kerri Santaolalla, Aida Sugimoto, Mikio Carroll, Peter Rubio, Jose Villers, Arnauld Bjartell, Anders Morgan, Todd Dasgupta, Prokar Van Hemelrijck, Mieke Elhage, Oussama Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Article BACKGROUND: Currently, follow-up protocols are applied equally to men on active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer (PCa) regardless of findings at their initial follow-up biopsy. To determine whether less intensive follow-up is suitable following negative biopsy findings, we assessed the risk of converting to active treatment, any subsequent upgrading, volume progression (>33% positive cores), and serious upgrading (grade group >2) for negative compared with positive findings on initial follow-up biopsy. METHODS: 13,161 men from 24 centres participating in the Global Action Plan Active Surveillance Prostate Cancer [GAP3] consortium database, with baseline grade group ≤2, PSA ≤ 20 ng/mL, cT-stage 1–2, diagnosed after 1995, and ≥1 follow-up biopsy, were included in this study. Risk of converting to treatment was assessed using multivariable mixed-effects survival regression. Odds of volume progression, any upgrading and serious upgrading were assessed using mix-effects binary logistic regression for men with ≥2 surveillance biopsies. RESULTS: 27% of the cohort (n = 3590) had no evidence of PCa at their initial biopsy. Over 50% of subsequent biopsies in this group were also negative. A negative initial biopsy was associated with lower risk of conversion (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42–0.49), subsequent upgrading (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.52; 95%CI: 0.45–0.62) and serious upgrading (OR: 0.74; 95%CI: 0.59–92). Radiological progression was not assessed due to limited imaging data. CONCLUSION: Despite heterogeneity in follow-up schedules, findings from this global study indicated reduced risk of converting to treatment, volume progression, any upgrading and serious upgrading among men whose initial biopsy findings were negative compared with positive. Given the low risk of progression and high likelihood of further negative biopsy findings, consideration should be given to decreasing follow-up intensity for this group to reduce unnecessary invasive biopsies. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-08-25 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10247354/ /pubmed/36008540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-022-00582-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Beckmann, Kerri
Santaolalla, Aida
Sugimoto, Mikio
Carroll, Peter
Rubio, Jose
Villers, Arnauld
Bjartell, Anders
Morgan, Todd
Dasgupta, Prokar
Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
Elhage, Oussama
Risk of progression following a negative biopsy in prostate cancer active surveillance
title Risk of progression following a negative biopsy in prostate cancer active surveillance
title_full Risk of progression following a negative biopsy in prostate cancer active surveillance
title_fullStr Risk of progression following a negative biopsy in prostate cancer active surveillance
title_full_unstemmed Risk of progression following a negative biopsy in prostate cancer active surveillance
title_short Risk of progression following a negative biopsy in prostate cancer active surveillance
title_sort risk of progression following a negative biopsy in prostate cancer active surveillance
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10247354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36008540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-022-00582-x
work_keys_str_mv AT beckmannkerri riskofprogressionfollowinganegativebiopsyinprostatecanceractivesurveillance
AT santaolallaaida riskofprogressionfollowinganegativebiopsyinprostatecanceractivesurveillance
AT sugimotomikio riskofprogressionfollowinganegativebiopsyinprostatecanceractivesurveillance
AT carrollpeter riskofprogressionfollowinganegativebiopsyinprostatecanceractivesurveillance
AT rubiojose riskofprogressionfollowinganegativebiopsyinprostatecanceractivesurveillance
AT villersarnauld riskofprogressionfollowinganegativebiopsyinprostatecanceractivesurveillance
AT bjartellanders riskofprogressionfollowinganegativebiopsyinprostatecanceractivesurveillance
AT morgantodd riskofprogressionfollowinganegativebiopsyinprostatecanceractivesurveillance
AT dasguptaprokar riskofprogressionfollowinganegativebiopsyinprostatecanceractivesurveillance
AT vanhemelrijckmieke riskofprogressionfollowinganegativebiopsyinprostatecanceractivesurveillance
AT elhageoussama riskofprogressionfollowinganegativebiopsyinprostatecanceractivesurveillance
AT riskofprogressionfollowinganegativebiopsyinprostatecanceractivesurveillance