Cargando…
SNP analysis of challenging bone DNA samples using the HID-Ion AmpliSeq™ Identity Panel: facts and artefacts
PCR-MPS is an emerging tool for the analysis of low-quality DNA samples. In this study, we used PCR-MPS to analyse 32 challenging bone DNA samples from three Second World War victims, which previously yielded no results in conventional STR PCR-CE typing. The Identity Panel was used with 27 cycles of...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10247551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37212920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-023-03019-9 |
_version_ | 1785055192629116928 |
---|---|
author | Fattorini, Paolo Previderè, Carlo Livieri, Tommaso Zupanc, Tomaž Pajnič, Irena Zupanič |
author_facet | Fattorini, Paolo Previderè, Carlo Livieri, Tommaso Zupanc, Tomaž Pajnič, Irena Zupanič |
author_sort | Fattorini, Paolo |
collection | PubMed |
description | PCR-MPS is an emerging tool for the analysis of low-quality DNA samples. In this study, we used PCR-MPS to analyse 32 challenging bone DNA samples from three Second World War victims, which previously yielded no results in conventional STR PCR-CE typing. The Identity Panel was used with 27 cycles of PCR. Despite that we only had an average of 6.8 pg of degraded DNA as template, 30 out of 32 libraries (93.8%) produced sequencing data for about 63/90 autosomal markers per sample. Out of the 30 libraries, 14 (46.7%) yielded single source genetic profiles in agreement with the biological identity of the donor, whereas 12 cases (40.0%) resulted in SNP profiles that did not match or were mixed. The misleading outcomes for those 12 cases were likely due to hidden exogenous human contamination, as shown by the higher frequencies of allelic imbalance, unusual high frequencies of allelic drop-ins, high heterozygosity levels in the consensus profiles generated from challenging samples, and traces of amplified molecular products in four out of eight extraction negative controls. Even if the source and the time of the contamination were not identified, it is likely that it occurred along the multi-step bone processing workflow. Our results suggest that only positive identification by statistical tools (e.g. likelihood ratio) should be accepted as reliable; oppositely, the results leading to exclusion should be treated as inconclusive because of potential contamination issues. Finally, strategies are discussed for monitoring the workflow of extremely challenging bone samples in PCR-MPS experiments with an increased number of PCR cycles. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00414-023-03019-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10247551 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102475512023-06-09 SNP analysis of challenging bone DNA samples using the HID-Ion AmpliSeq™ Identity Panel: facts and artefacts Fattorini, Paolo Previderè, Carlo Livieri, Tommaso Zupanc, Tomaž Pajnič, Irena Zupanič Int J Legal Med Original Article PCR-MPS is an emerging tool for the analysis of low-quality DNA samples. In this study, we used PCR-MPS to analyse 32 challenging bone DNA samples from three Second World War victims, which previously yielded no results in conventional STR PCR-CE typing. The Identity Panel was used with 27 cycles of PCR. Despite that we only had an average of 6.8 pg of degraded DNA as template, 30 out of 32 libraries (93.8%) produced sequencing data for about 63/90 autosomal markers per sample. Out of the 30 libraries, 14 (46.7%) yielded single source genetic profiles in agreement with the biological identity of the donor, whereas 12 cases (40.0%) resulted in SNP profiles that did not match or were mixed. The misleading outcomes for those 12 cases were likely due to hidden exogenous human contamination, as shown by the higher frequencies of allelic imbalance, unusual high frequencies of allelic drop-ins, high heterozygosity levels in the consensus profiles generated from challenging samples, and traces of amplified molecular products in four out of eight extraction negative controls. Even if the source and the time of the contamination were not identified, it is likely that it occurred along the multi-step bone processing workflow. Our results suggest that only positive identification by statistical tools (e.g. likelihood ratio) should be accepted as reliable; oppositely, the results leading to exclusion should be treated as inconclusive because of potential contamination issues. Finally, strategies are discussed for monitoring the workflow of extremely challenging bone samples in PCR-MPS experiments with an increased number of PCR cycles. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00414-023-03019-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-05-22 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10247551/ /pubmed/37212920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-023-03019-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Fattorini, Paolo Previderè, Carlo Livieri, Tommaso Zupanc, Tomaž Pajnič, Irena Zupanič SNP analysis of challenging bone DNA samples using the HID-Ion AmpliSeq™ Identity Panel: facts and artefacts |
title | SNP analysis of challenging bone DNA samples using the HID-Ion AmpliSeq™ Identity Panel: facts and artefacts |
title_full | SNP analysis of challenging bone DNA samples using the HID-Ion AmpliSeq™ Identity Panel: facts and artefacts |
title_fullStr | SNP analysis of challenging bone DNA samples using the HID-Ion AmpliSeq™ Identity Panel: facts and artefacts |
title_full_unstemmed | SNP analysis of challenging bone DNA samples using the HID-Ion AmpliSeq™ Identity Panel: facts and artefacts |
title_short | SNP analysis of challenging bone DNA samples using the HID-Ion AmpliSeq™ Identity Panel: facts and artefacts |
title_sort | snp analysis of challenging bone dna samples using the hid-ion ampliseq™ identity panel: facts and artefacts |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10247551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37212920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-023-03019-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fattorinipaolo snpanalysisofchallengingbonednasamplesusingthehidionampliseqidentitypanelfactsandartefacts AT previderecarlo snpanalysisofchallengingbonednasamplesusingthehidionampliseqidentitypanelfactsandartefacts AT livieritommaso snpanalysisofchallengingbonednasamplesusingthehidionampliseqidentitypanelfactsandartefacts AT zupanctomaz snpanalysisofchallengingbonednasamplesusingthehidionampliseqidentitypanelfactsandartefacts AT pajnicirenazupanic snpanalysisofchallengingbonednasamplesusingthehidionampliseqidentitypanelfactsandartefacts |