Cargando…
Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar Romiplostim Versus Innovator Romiplostim in Patients with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia
Romiplostim is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapy for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Biosimilar is a biological product that has no clinical meaningful difference from an existing FDA-approved reference product. It has a potential of lowering health-care-related cost. Biosimilar o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer India
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10247600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37304488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12288-022-01602-5 |
_version_ | 1785055200205078528 |
---|---|
author | Chandrakala, S. Toshniwal, Manoj Halvawala, Mitesh Padwal, Namita Sidharthan, Neeraj Malhotra, Pankaj Prashantha, B. Ballikar, Riya Shah, Sandip Apte, Shashikant Viswanathan, T. Kasi Ramanan, Vijay Sharma, Akhilesh Pawar, Dattatray Pawar, Roshan Shahavi, Vinayaka |
author_facet | Chandrakala, S. Toshniwal, Manoj Halvawala, Mitesh Padwal, Namita Sidharthan, Neeraj Malhotra, Pankaj Prashantha, B. Ballikar, Riya Shah, Sandip Apte, Shashikant Viswanathan, T. Kasi Ramanan, Vijay Sharma, Akhilesh Pawar, Dattatray Pawar, Roshan Shahavi, Vinayaka |
author_sort | Chandrakala, S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Romiplostim is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapy for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Biosimilar is a biological product that has no clinical meaningful difference from an existing FDA-approved reference product. It has a potential of lowering health-care-related cost. Biosimilar of romiplostim can be made available to patients with ITP at a low cost and can be beneficial in providing the best therapy. Thus, the efficacy and safety of biosimilar romiplostim (ENZ110) was compared with innovator romiplostim (Nplate) with respect to platelet response in patients with chronic ITP. This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, and double-blind clinical trial. Patients with chronic ITP, aged 18–65 years, were enrolled in a study and were randomized to receive either ENZ110 or Nplate in a 3:1 ratio for a treatment period of 12 weeks, respectively. After completion of the treatment period, the patients were followed-up for one week to evaluate the platelet response and to monitor the adverse events (AEs). Over the duration of 12 weeks, platelet response of > 50 × 10(9)/L was achieved in 85.3% patients treated with ENZ110 and in 75.0% patients treated with Nplate in per protocol population. In intent-to-treat population, 83.8% patients with ENZ110 and 76.9% patients with Nplate achieved a platelet response of > 50 × 10(9)/L. In the ENZ110 group, 111 AEs were recorded in 66.7% patients, while 18 AEs were reported in 61.5% patients in the Nplate group. The study demonstrated non-inferiority with comparable efficacy and safety between biosimilar romiplostim and innovator romiplostim in patients with chronic ITP. Trial registration number and date of registration: CTRI/2019/04/018614. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10247600 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer India |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102476002023-06-09 Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar Romiplostim Versus Innovator Romiplostim in Patients with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia Chandrakala, S. Toshniwal, Manoj Halvawala, Mitesh Padwal, Namita Sidharthan, Neeraj Malhotra, Pankaj Prashantha, B. Ballikar, Riya Shah, Sandip Apte, Shashikant Viswanathan, T. Kasi Ramanan, Vijay Sharma, Akhilesh Pawar, Dattatray Pawar, Roshan Shahavi, Vinayaka Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus Original Article Romiplostim is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapy for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Biosimilar is a biological product that has no clinical meaningful difference from an existing FDA-approved reference product. It has a potential of lowering health-care-related cost. Biosimilar of romiplostim can be made available to patients with ITP at a low cost and can be beneficial in providing the best therapy. Thus, the efficacy and safety of biosimilar romiplostim (ENZ110) was compared with innovator romiplostim (Nplate) with respect to platelet response in patients with chronic ITP. This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, and double-blind clinical trial. Patients with chronic ITP, aged 18–65 years, were enrolled in a study and were randomized to receive either ENZ110 or Nplate in a 3:1 ratio for a treatment period of 12 weeks, respectively. After completion of the treatment period, the patients were followed-up for one week to evaluate the platelet response and to monitor the adverse events (AEs). Over the duration of 12 weeks, platelet response of > 50 × 10(9)/L was achieved in 85.3% patients treated with ENZ110 and in 75.0% patients treated with Nplate in per protocol population. In intent-to-treat population, 83.8% patients with ENZ110 and 76.9% patients with Nplate achieved a platelet response of > 50 × 10(9)/L. In the ENZ110 group, 111 AEs were recorded in 66.7% patients, while 18 AEs were reported in 61.5% patients in the Nplate group. The study demonstrated non-inferiority with comparable efficacy and safety between biosimilar romiplostim and innovator romiplostim in patients with chronic ITP. Trial registration number and date of registration: CTRI/2019/04/018614. Springer India 2022-11-15 2023-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10247600/ /pubmed/37304488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12288-022-01602-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Chandrakala, S. Toshniwal, Manoj Halvawala, Mitesh Padwal, Namita Sidharthan, Neeraj Malhotra, Pankaj Prashantha, B. Ballikar, Riya Shah, Sandip Apte, Shashikant Viswanathan, T. Kasi Ramanan, Vijay Sharma, Akhilesh Pawar, Dattatray Pawar, Roshan Shahavi, Vinayaka Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar Romiplostim Versus Innovator Romiplostim in Patients with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia |
title | Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar Romiplostim Versus Innovator Romiplostim in Patients with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia |
title_full | Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar Romiplostim Versus Innovator Romiplostim in Patients with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar Romiplostim Versus Innovator Romiplostim in Patients with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar Romiplostim Versus Innovator Romiplostim in Patients with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia |
title_short | Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar Romiplostim Versus Innovator Romiplostim in Patients with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of biosimilar romiplostim versus innovator romiplostim in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10247600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37304488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12288-022-01602-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chandrakalas efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia AT toshniwalmanoj efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia AT halvawalamitesh efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia AT padwalnamita efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia AT sidharthanneeraj efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia AT malhotrapankaj efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia AT prashanthab efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia AT ballikarriya efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia AT shahsandip efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia AT apteshashikant efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia AT viswanathantkasi efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia AT ramananvijay efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia AT sharmaakhilesh efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia AT pawardattatray efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia AT pawarroshan efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia AT shahavivinayaka efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia |