Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar Romiplostim Versus Innovator Romiplostim in Patients with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia

Romiplostim is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapy for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Biosimilar is a biological product that has no clinical meaningful difference from an existing FDA-approved reference product. It has a potential of lowering health-care-related cost. Biosimilar o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chandrakala, S., Toshniwal, Manoj, Halvawala, Mitesh, Padwal, Namita, Sidharthan, Neeraj, Malhotra, Pankaj, Prashantha, B., Ballikar, Riya, Shah, Sandip, Apte, Shashikant, Viswanathan, T. Kasi, Ramanan, Vijay, Sharma, Akhilesh, Pawar, Dattatray, Pawar, Roshan, Shahavi, Vinayaka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer India 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10247600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37304488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12288-022-01602-5
_version_ 1785055200205078528
author Chandrakala, S.
Toshniwal, Manoj
Halvawala, Mitesh
Padwal, Namita
Sidharthan, Neeraj
Malhotra, Pankaj
Prashantha, B.
Ballikar, Riya
Shah, Sandip
Apte, Shashikant
Viswanathan, T. Kasi
Ramanan, Vijay
Sharma, Akhilesh
Pawar, Dattatray
Pawar, Roshan
Shahavi, Vinayaka
author_facet Chandrakala, S.
Toshniwal, Manoj
Halvawala, Mitesh
Padwal, Namita
Sidharthan, Neeraj
Malhotra, Pankaj
Prashantha, B.
Ballikar, Riya
Shah, Sandip
Apte, Shashikant
Viswanathan, T. Kasi
Ramanan, Vijay
Sharma, Akhilesh
Pawar, Dattatray
Pawar, Roshan
Shahavi, Vinayaka
author_sort Chandrakala, S.
collection PubMed
description Romiplostim is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapy for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Biosimilar is a biological product that has no clinical meaningful difference from an existing FDA-approved reference product. It has a potential of lowering health-care-related cost. Biosimilar of romiplostim can be made available to patients with ITP at a low cost and can be beneficial in providing the best therapy. Thus, the efficacy and safety of biosimilar romiplostim (ENZ110) was compared with innovator romiplostim (Nplate) with respect to platelet response in patients with chronic ITP. This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, and double-blind clinical trial. Patients with chronic ITP, aged 18–65 years, were enrolled in a study and were randomized to receive either ENZ110 or Nplate in a 3:1 ratio for a treatment period of 12 weeks, respectively. After completion of the treatment period, the patients were followed-up for one week to evaluate the platelet response and to monitor the adverse events (AEs). Over the duration of 12 weeks, platelet response of > 50 × 10(9)/L was achieved in 85.3% patients treated with ENZ110 and in 75.0% patients treated with Nplate in per protocol population. In intent-to-treat population, 83.8% patients with ENZ110 and 76.9% patients with Nplate achieved a platelet response of > 50 × 10(9)/L. In the ENZ110 group, 111 AEs were recorded in 66.7% patients, while 18 AEs were reported in 61.5% patients in the Nplate group. The study demonstrated non-inferiority with comparable efficacy and safety between biosimilar romiplostim and innovator romiplostim in patients with chronic ITP. Trial registration number and date of registration: CTRI/2019/04/018614.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10247600
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer India
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102476002023-06-09 Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar Romiplostim Versus Innovator Romiplostim in Patients with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia Chandrakala, S. Toshniwal, Manoj Halvawala, Mitesh Padwal, Namita Sidharthan, Neeraj Malhotra, Pankaj Prashantha, B. Ballikar, Riya Shah, Sandip Apte, Shashikant Viswanathan, T. Kasi Ramanan, Vijay Sharma, Akhilesh Pawar, Dattatray Pawar, Roshan Shahavi, Vinayaka Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus Original Article Romiplostim is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapy for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Biosimilar is a biological product that has no clinical meaningful difference from an existing FDA-approved reference product. It has a potential of lowering health-care-related cost. Biosimilar of romiplostim can be made available to patients with ITP at a low cost and can be beneficial in providing the best therapy. Thus, the efficacy and safety of biosimilar romiplostim (ENZ110) was compared with innovator romiplostim (Nplate) with respect to platelet response in patients with chronic ITP. This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, and double-blind clinical trial. Patients with chronic ITP, aged 18–65 years, were enrolled in a study and were randomized to receive either ENZ110 or Nplate in a 3:1 ratio for a treatment period of 12 weeks, respectively. After completion of the treatment period, the patients were followed-up for one week to evaluate the platelet response and to monitor the adverse events (AEs). Over the duration of 12 weeks, platelet response of > 50 × 10(9)/L was achieved in 85.3% patients treated with ENZ110 and in 75.0% patients treated with Nplate in per protocol population. In intent-to-treat population, 83.8% patients with ENZ110 and 76.9% patients with Nplate achieved a platelet response of > 50 × 10(9)/L. In the ENZ110 group, 111 AEs were recorded in 66.7% patients, while 18 AEs were reported in 61.5% patients in the Nplate group. The study demonstrated non-inferiority with comparable efficacy and safety between biosimilar romiplostim and innovator romiplostim in patients with chronic ITP. Trial registration number and date of registration: CTRI/2019/04/018614. Springer India 2022-11-15 2023-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10247600/ /pubmed/37304488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12288-022-01602-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Chandrakala, S.
Toshniwal, Manoj
Halvawala, Mitesh
Padwal, Namita
Sidharthan, Neeraj
Malhotra, Pankaj
Prashantha, B.
Ballikar, Riya
Shah, Sandip
Apte, Shashikant
Viswanathan, T. Kasi
Ramanan, Vijay
Sharma, Akhilesh
Pawar, Dattatray
Pawar, Roshan
Shahavi, Vinayaka
Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar Romiplostim Versus Innovator Romiplostim in Patients with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia
title Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar Romiplostim Versus Innovator Romiplostim in Patients with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar Romiplostim Versus Innovator Romiplostim in Patients with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar Romiplostim Versus Innovator Romiplostim in Patients with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar Romiplostim Versus Innovator Romiplostim in Patients with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar Romiplostim Versus Innovator Romiplostim in Patients with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia
title_sort efficacy and safety of biosimilar romiplostim versus innovator romiplostim in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10247600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37304488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12288-022-01602-5
work_keys_str_mv AT chandrakalas efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia
AT toshniwalmanoj efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia
AT halvawalamitesh efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia
AT padwalnamita efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia
AT sidharthanneeraj efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia
AT malhotrapankaj efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia
AT prashanthab efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia
AT ballikarriya efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia
AT shahsandip efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia
AT apteshashikant efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia
AT viswanathantkasi efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia
AT ramananvijay efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia
AT sharmaakhilesh efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia
AT pawardattatray efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia
AT pawarroshan efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia
AT shahavivinayaka efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarromiplostimversusinnovatorromiplostiminpatientswithchronicimmunethrombocytopenia