Cargando…
Knife wound or nosebleed—where does the blood at the crime scene come from?
Secretion analysis is a useful tool in forensic genetics, since it establishes the (cellular) origin of the DNA prior in addition to the identification of the DNA donor. This information can be crucial for the construction of the crime sequence or verification of statements of people involved in the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10247842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37148347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-023-03012-2 |
_version_ | 1785055245056868352 |
---|---|
author | Konrad, Helen Lawniczek, Janina Bajramjan, Christine Weber, Lisa Bajanowski, Thomas Poetsch, Micaela |
author_facet | Konrad, Helen Lawniczek, Janina Bajramjan, Christine Weber, Lisa Bajanowski, Thomas Poetsch, Micaela |
author_sort | Konrad, Helen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Secretion analysis is a useful tool in forensic genetics, since it establishes the (cellular) origin of the DNA prior in addition to the identification of the DNA donor. This information can be crucial for the construction of the crime sequence or verification of statements of people involved in the crime. For some secretions, rapid/pretests already exist (blood, semen, urine, and saliva) or can be determined via published methylation analyses or expression analyses (blood, saliva vaginal secretions, menstrual blood, and semen). To discriminate nasal secretion/blood from other secretions (like oral mucosa/saliva, blood, vaginal secretion, menstrual blood, and seminal fluid), assays based on specific methylation patterns at several CpGs were set up in this study. Out of an initial 54 different CpG markers tested, two markers showed a specific methylation value for nasal samples: N21 and N27 with a methylation mean value of 64.4% ± 17.6% and 33.2% ± 8.7%, respectively. Although identification or discrimination was not possible for all nasal samples (due to partial overlap in methylation values to other secretions), 63% and 26% of the nasal samples could be unambiguously identified and distinguished from the other secretions using the CpG marker N21 and N27, respectively. In combination with a blood pretest/rapid test, a third marker (N10) was able to detect nasal cells in 53% of samples. Moreover, the employment of this pretest increases the proportion of identifiable or discriminable nasal secretion samples using marker N27 to 68%. In summary, our CpG assays proved to be promising tools in forensic analysis for the detection of nasal cells in samples from a crime scene. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10247842 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102478422023-06-09 Knife wound or nosebleed—where does the blood at the crime scene come from? Konrad, Helen Lawniczek, Janina Bajramjan, Christine Weber, Lisa Bajanowski, Thomas Poetsch, Micaela Int J Legal Med Short Communication Secretion analysis is a useful tool in forensic genetics, since it establishes the (cellular) origin of the DNA prior in addition to the identification of the DNA donor. This information can be crucial for the construction of the crime sequence or verification of statements of people involved in the crime. For some secretions, rapid/pretests already exist (blood, semen, urine, and saliva) or can be determined via published methylation analyses or expression analyses (blood, saliva vaginal secretions, menstrual blood, and semen). To discriminate nasal secretion/blood from other secretions (like oral mucosa/saliva, blood, vaginal secretion, menstrual blood, and seminal fluid), assays based on specific methylation patterns at several CpGs were set up in this study. Out of an initial 54 different CpG markers tested, two markers showed a specific methylation value for nasal samples: N21 and N27 with a methylation mean value of 64.4% ± 17.6% and 33.2% ± 8.7%, respectively. Although identification or discrimination was not possible for all nasal samples (due to partial overlap in methylation values to other secretions), 63% and 26% of the nasal samples could be unambiguously identified and distinguished from the other secretions using the CpG marker N21 and N27, respectively. In combination with a blood pretest/rapid test, a third marker (N10) was able to detect nasal cells in 53% of samples. Moreover, the employment of this pretest increases the proportion of identifiable or discriminable nasal secretion samples using marker N27 to 68%. In summary, our CpG assays proved to be promising tools in forensic analysis for the detection of nasal cells in samples from a crime scene. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-05-06 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10247842/ /pubmed/37148347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-023-03012-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Konrad, Helen Lawniczek, Janina Bajramjan, Christine Weber, Lisa Bajanowski, Thomas Poetsch, Micaela Knife wound or nosebleed—where does the blood at the crime scene come from? |
title | Knife wound or nosebleed—where does the blood at the crime scene come from? |
title_full | Knife wound or nosebleed—where does the blood at the crime scene come from? |
title_fullStr | Knife wound or nosebleed—where does the blood at the crime scene come from? |
title_full_unstemmed | Knife wound or nosebleed—where does the blood at the crime scene come from? |
title_short | Knife wound or nosebleed—where does the blood at the crime scene come from? |
title_sort | knife wound or nosebleed—where does the blood at the crime scene come from? |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10247842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37148347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-023-03012-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT konradhelen knifewoundornosebleedwheredoesthebloodatthecrimescenecomefrom AT lawniczekjanina knifewoundornosebleedwheredoesthebloodatthecrimescenecomefrom AT bajramjanchristine knifewoundornosebleedwheredoesthebloodatthecrimescenecomefrom AT weberlisa knifewoundornosebleedwheredoesthebloodatthecrimescenecomefrom AT bajanowskithomas knifewoundornosebleedwheredoesthebloodatthecrimescenecomefrom AT poetschmicaela knifewoundornosebleedwheredoesthebloodatthecrimescenecomefrom |