Cargando…

Causal relationship between circulating immune cells and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a Mendelian randomization study

OBJECTIVES: Though type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been known as a metabolic disease caused by multiple factors, the etiology remains insufficiently understood. Here, we aimed to figure out whether circulating immune cell profiles causally impact T2D liability. METHODS: We applied one genome-wide associat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jin, Niu, Qingmin, Wu, Aiwei, Zhang, Yuchu, Hong, Liquan, Wang, Hu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10247959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37305035
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1210415
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: Though type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been known as a metabolic disease caused by multiple factors, the etiology remains insufficiently understood. Here, we aimed to figure out whether circulating immune cell profiles causally impact T2D liability. METHODS: We applied one genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics of blood traits in 563,085 participants from the Blood Cell Consortium and another GWAS of flow cytometric profile of lymphocyte subsets comprising 3,757 Sardinians to identify genetically predicted blood immune cells. We also obtained GWAS summary statistics in 898,130 individuals from the DIAGRAM Consortium to evaluate genetically predicted T2D. We primarily used inverse variance weighted (IVW) and weighted median methods to perform Mendelian randomization analyses and sensitivity analyses to evaluate heterogeneity and pleiotropy. RESULTS: For circulating blood leukocyte and its subpopulations, the increase of genetically predicted circulating monocyte count was causally correlated with a higher risk of T2D [odds ratio (OR) = 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.02–1.10, p = 0.0048]. For lymphocyte subsets, CD8(+) T cell and CD4(+) CD8(dim) T cell count were identified with causal effect on T2D susceptibility (CD8(+) T cell: OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.03–1.17, p = 0.0053; CD4(+) CD8(dim) T cell: OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.01–1.08, p = 0.0070). No pleiotropy was determined. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrated that higher circulating monocyte and T-lymphocyte subpopulation predicted increased T2D susceptibility, which confirmed the immunity predisposition for T2D. Our results may have the potential to provide new therapeutic targets for the diagnosis and treatment of T2D.