Cargando…

Process Modeling a Radiation Oncology Clinic Workflow From Therapeutic Simulation to Treatment: Identifying Impending Strain and Possible Treatment Delays

PURPOSE: The administration of safe, high-quality radiation therapy requires the systematic completion of a series of steps from computed tomography simulation, physician contouring, dosimetric treatment planning, pretreatment quality assurance, plan verification, and, ultimately, treatment delivery...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chowdhry, Varun Kumar, Simpson, Natalie Catherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10248038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37305072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2023.101261
_version_ 1785055284177141760
author Chowdhry, Varun Kumar
Simpson, Natalie Catherine
author_facet Chowdhry, Varun Kumar
Simpson, Natalie Catherine
author_sort Chowdhry, Varun Kumar
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The administration of safe, high-quality radiation therapy requires the systematic completion of a series of steps from computed tomography simulation, physician contouring, dosimetric treatment planning, pretreatment quality assurance, plan verification, and, ultimately, treatment delivery. Nevertheless, due consideration to the cumulative time required to complete each of these steps is often not given sufficient attention when determining patient start date. We set out to understand the systemic dynamics as to how varying patient arrival rate can affect treatment turnaround times using Monte Carlo simulations. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We developed a process model workflow for a single physician, single linear accelerator clinic that simulated arrival rates and processing times for patients undergoing radiation treatment using the AnyLogic Simulation Modeling software (AnyLogic 8 University edition, v8.7.9). We varied the new patient arrival rate from 1 to 10 patients per week to understand the effect of treatment turnaround times from simulation to treatment. We used processing-time estimates determined in prior focus studies for each of the required steps. RESULTS: Altering the number of patients simulated from 1 per week to 10 per week resulted in a corresponding increase in average processing time from simulation to treatment from 4 to 7 days. The maximum processing time for patients from simulation to treatment ranged from 6 to 12 days. To compare individual distributions, we used the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistical test. We found that altering the arrival rate from 4 patients per week to 5 patients per week resulted in a statistically significant change in the distributions of processing times (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this simulation-based modeling study confirm the appropriateness of current staffing levels to ensure timely patient delivery while minimizing staff burnout. Simulation modeling can help guide staffing and workflow models to ensure timely treatment delivery while ensuring quality and safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10248038
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102480382023-06-09 Process Modeling a Radiation Oncology Clinic Workflow From Therapeutic Simulation to Treatment: Identifying Impending Strain and Possible Treatment Delays Chowdhry, Varun Kumar Simpson, Natalie Catherine Adv Radiat Oncol Research Letter PURPOSE: The administration of safe, high-quality radiation therapy requires the systematic completion of a series of steps from computed tomography simulation, physician contouring, dosimetric treatment planning, pretreatment quality assurance, plan verification, and, ultimately, treatment delivery. Nevertheless, due consideration to the cumulative time required to complete each of these steps is often not given sufficient attention when determining patient start date. We set out to understand the systemic dynamics as to how varying patient arrival rate can affect treatment turnaround times using Monte Carlo simulations. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We developed a process model workflow for a single physician, single linear accelerator clinic that simulated arrival rates and processing times for patients undergoing radiation treatment using the AnyLogic Simulation Modeling software (AnyLogic 8 University edition, v8.7.9). We varied the new patient arrival rate from 1 to 10 patients per week to understand the effect of treatment turnaround times from simulation to treatment. We used processing-time estimates determined in prior focus studies for each of the required steps. RESULTS: Altering the number of patients simulated from 1 per week to 10 per week resulted in a corresponding increase in average processing time from simulation to treatment from 4 to 7 days. The maximum processing time for patients from simulation to treatment ranged from 6 to 12 days. To compare individual distributions, we used the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistical test. We found that altering the arrival rate from 4 patients per week to 5 patients per week resulted in a statistically significant change in the distributions of processing times (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this simulation-based modeling study confirm the appropriateness of current staffing levels to ensure timely patient delivery while minimizing staff burnout. Simulation modeling can help guide staffing and workflow models to ensure timely treatment delivery while ensuring quality and safety. Elsevier 2023-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10248038/ /pubmed/37305072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2023.101261 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Letter
Chowdhry, Varun Kumar
Simpson, Natalie Catherine
Process Modeling a Radiation Oncology Clinic Workflow From Therapeutic Simulation to Treatment: Identifying Impending Strain and Possible Treatment Delays
title Process Modeling a Radiation Oncology Clinic Workflow From Therapeutic Simulation to Treatment: Identifying Impending Strain and Possible Treatment Delays
title_full Process Modeling a Radiation Oncology Clinic Workflow From Therapeutic Simulation to Treatment: Identifying Impending Strain and Possible Treatment Delays
title_fullStr Process Modeling a Radiation Oncology Clinic Workflow From Therapeutic Simulation to Treatment: Identifying Impending Strain and Possible Treatment Delays
title_full_unstemmed Process Modeling a Radiation Oncology Clinic Workflow From Therapeutic Simulation to Treatment: Identifying Impending Strain and Possible Treatment Delays
title_short Process Modeling a Radiation Oncology Clinic Workflow From Therapeutic Simulation to Treatment: Identifying Impending Strain and Possible Treatment Delays
title_sort process modeling a radiation oncology clinic workflow from therapeutic simulation to treatment: identifying impending strain and possible treatment delays
topic Research Letter
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10248038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37305072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2023.101261
work_keys_str_mv AT chowdhryvarunkumar processmodelingaradiationoncologyclinicworkflowfromtherapeuticsimulationtotreatmentidentifyingimpendingstrainandpossibletreatmentdelays
AT simpsonnataliecatherine processmodelingaradiationoncologyclinicworkflowfromtherapeuticsimulationtotreatmentidentifyingimpendingstrainandpossibletreatmentdelays