Cargando…
Preferences for Electronic Modes of Communication Among Older Primary Care Patients: Cross-sectional Survey
BACKGROUND: Health information delivered via daily modes of communication such as email, text, or telephone reportedly supports improved health behavior and outcomes. While different modes of communication beyond clinical visits have proven successful for patient outcomes, preferences for communicat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10248769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37223979 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/40709 |
_version_ | 1785055424050888704 |
---|---|
author | Fridman, Ilona Smalls, Ahmaya Fleming, Patrice Elston Lafata, Jennifer |
author_facet | Fridman, Ilona Smalls, Ahmaya Fleming, Patrice Elston Lafata, Jennifer |
author_sort | Fridman, Ilona |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Health information delivered via daily modes of communication such as email, text, or telephone reportedly supports improved health behavior and outcomes. While different modes of communication beyond clinical visits have proven successful for patient outcomes, preferences for communication modes have not been comprehensively studied among older primary care patients. We addressed this gap by assessing patient preferences for receiving cancer screening and other information from their doctors’ offices. OBJECTIVE: We explored stated preferences by communication modes through the lens of social determinants of health (SDOH) to gauge acceptability and equity implications for future interventions. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was mailed to primary care patients aged 45-75 years, in 2020-2021, which assessed respondents' use of telephones, computers, or tablets in daily life and their preferred modes of communication for different types of health information, including educational materials about cancer screening, tips for taking prescription medication, and protection from respiratory diseases from their doctors’ offices. Respondents indicated their willingness to receive messages from their doctors’ offices via each of the provided modes of communication, including telephone, text, email, patient portals, websites, and social media, on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from “unwilling” to “willing.” We present the percentage of respondents who indicated that they were “willing” to receive information via specific electronic mode. Chi-square tests were used to compare participants’ willingness by social characteristics. RESULTS: In total, 133 people completed the survey (response rate 27%). The average respondent age was 64 years, 82 (63%) respondents were female, 106 (83%) were White, 20 (16%) were Black, and 1 (1%) was Asian. In total, 75 (58%) respondents had a bachelor’s degree or higher; 26 (20%) resided in rural areas, 37 (29%) in suburban areas, 50 (39%) in a town, and 15 (12%) in a city. The majority, 73 (57%), reported being comfortable with their income. Preferences of respondents for electronic communication about cancer screening were distributed as follows: 100 (75%) respondents were willing to receive information from their doctor’s office via their patient portal, 98 (74%) via email, 75 (56%) via text, 60 (45%) via the hospital website, 50 (38%) via telephone, and 14 (11%) via social media. About 6 (5%) respondents were unwilling to receive any communication via electronic modes. Preferences were distributed similarly for other types of information. Respondents reporting lesser income and education consistently preferred receiving telephone calls relative to other communication modes. CONCLUSIONS: To optimize health communication and reach a socioeconomically diverse population, telephone calls should be added to electronic communication, especially for people with less income and education. Further research needs to identify the underlying reasons for the observed differences and how best to ensure that socioeconomically diverse groups of older adults can access reliable health information and health care services. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10248769 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102487692023-06-09 Preferences for Electronic Modes of Communication Among Older Primary Care Patients: Cross-sectional Survey Fridman, Ilona Smalls, Ahmaya Fleming, Patrice Elston Lafata, Jennifer JMIR Form Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Health information delivered via daily modes of communication such as email, text, or telephone reportedly supports improved health behavior and outcomes. While different modes of communication beyond clinical visits have proven successful for patient outcomes, preferences for communication modes have not been comprehensively studied among older primary care patients. We addressed this gap by assessing patient preferences for receiving cancer screening and other information from their doctors’ offices. OBJECTIVE: We explored stated preferences by communication modes through the lens of social determinants of health (SDOH) to gauge acceptability and equity implications for future interventions. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was mailed to primary care patients aged 45-75 years, in 2020-2021, which assessed respondents' use of telephones, computers, or tablets in daily life and their preferred modes of communication for different types of health information, including educational materials about cancer screening, tips for taking prescription medication, and protection from respiratory diseases from their doctors’ offices. Respondents indicated their willingness to receive messages from their doctors’ offices via each of the provided modes of communication, including telephone, text, email, patient portals, websites, and social media, on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from “unwilling” to “willing.” We present the percentage of respondents who indicated that they were “willing” to receive information via specific electronic mode. Chi-square tests were used to compare participants’ willingness by social characteristics. RESULTS: In total, 133 people completed the survey (response rate 27%). The average respondent age was 64 years, 82 (63%) respondents were female, 106 (83%) were White, 20 (16%) were Black, and 1 (1%) was Asian. In total, 75 (58%) respondents had a bachelor’s degree or higher; 26 (20%) resided in rural areas, 37 (29%) in suburban areas, 50 (39%) in a town, and 15 (12%) in a city. The majority, 73 (57%), reported being comfortable with their income. Preferences of respondents for electronic communication about cancer screening were distributed as follows: 100 (75%) respondents were willing to receive information from their doctor’s office via their patient portal, 98 (74%) via email, 75 (56%) via text, 60 (45%) via the hospital website, 50 (38%) via telephone, and 14 (11%) via social media. About 6 (5%) respondents were unwilling to receive any communication via electronic modes. Preferences were distributed similarly for other types of information. Respondents reporting lesser income and education consistently preferred receiving telephone calls relative to other communication modes. CONCLUSIONS: To optimize health communication and reach a socioeconomically diverse population, telephone calls should be added to electronic communication, especially for people with less income and education. Further research needs to identify the underlying reasons for the observed differences and how best to ensure that socioeconomically diverse groups of older adults can access reliable health information and health care services. JMIR Publications 2023-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10248769/ /pubmed/37223979 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/40709 Text en ©Ilona Fridman, Ahmaya Smalls, Patrice Fleming, Jennifer Elston Lafata. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 24.05.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Fridman, Ilona Smalls, Ahmaya Fleming, Patrice Elston Lafata, Jennifer Preferences for Electronic Modes of Communication Among Older Primary Care Patients: Cross-sectional Survey |
title | Preferences for Electronic Modes of Communication Among Older Primary Care Patients: Cross-sectional Survey |
title_full | Preferences for Electronic Modes of Communication Among Older Primary Care Patients: Cross-sectional Survey |
title_fullStr | Preferences for Electronic Modes of Communication Among Older Primary Care Patients: Cross-sectional Survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Preferences for Electronic Modes of Communication Among Older Primary Care Patients: Cross-sectional Survey |
title_short | Preferences for Electronic Modes of Communication Among Older Primary Care Patients: Cross-sectional Survey |
title_sort | preferences for electronic modes of communication among older primary care patients: cross-sectional survey |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10248769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37223979 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/40709 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fridmanilona preferencesforelectronicmodesofcommunicationamongolderprimarycarepatientscrosssectionalsurvey AT smallsahmaya preferencesforelectronicmodesofcommunicationamongolderprimarycarepatientscrosssectionalsurvey AT flemingpatrice preferencesforelectronicmodesofcommunicationamongolderprimarycarepatientscrosssectionalsurvey AT elstonlafatajennifer preferencesforelectronicmodesofcommunicationamongolderprimarycarepatientscrosssectionalsurvey |