Cargando…

Frameless versus frame-based stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial arteriovenous malformations: A propensity-matched analysis

OBJECTIVE: The frameless linear accelerator (LINAC) based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been evolving with a reduction in patient discomfort. However, there was limited evidence comparing frame-based and frameless SRS for intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVM). We aimed to compare the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Zhexi, Ho, Man Kit Jason, Lee, Wan Yan Venus, Law, Hing Yuen, Wong, Yee Wa Victy, Leung, To-wai, Mui, Wing Ho, Wong, Sui-To, Wong, Chi Sing Frank, Yam, Kwong Yui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10248791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37304170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100642
_version_ 1785055429174231040
author He, Zhexi
Ho, Man Kit Jason
Lee, Wan Yan Venus
Law, Hing Yuen
Wong, Yee Wa Victy
Leung, To-wai
Mui, Wing Ho
Wong, Sui-To
Wong, Chi Sing Frank
Yam, Kwong Yui
author_facet He, Zhexi
Ho, Man Kit Jason
Lee, Wan Yan Venus
Law, Hing Yuen
Wong, Yee Wa Victy
Leung, To-wai
Mui, Wing Ho
Wong, Sui-To
Wong, Chi Sing Frank
Yam, Kwong Yui
author_sort He, Zhexi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The frameless linear accelerator (LINAC) based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been evolving with a reduction in patient discomfort. However, there was limited evidence comparing frame-based and frameless SRS for intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVM). We aimed to compare the treatment outcomes between frame-based and frameless LINAC SRS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort compared the outcomes of frame-based LINAC SRS (1998–2009) with frameless LINAC SRS (2010–2020). The primary outcome was the obliteration rate. The other outcomes included the neurological, radiological, and functional outcomes after SRS. A matched cohort was identified by propensity scores for further comparisons. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients were included with a mean follow-up time of 13.2 years (158.5 months). There were 40 patients in the frame-based group and 25 patients in the frameless group. The overall obliteration rate was comparable (Frame-based 82.5% vs Frameless 80.0%, p = 0.310) and not significantly different over time (log-rank p = 0.536). The crude post-SRS hemorrhage rate was 1.5% and the incidence was 0.3 per 100 person-years. There were 67.7% of patients with AVM obliteration without new persistent neurological deficits at the last visit and 56.9% of patients with AVM obliteration without any deficits (transient or persistent) during the entire follow-up period. Four patients (8.0%) developed late onset persistent adverse radiation effects (more than 96 months after SRS) among 50 patients with more than 8-year surveillance. In the propensity-matched cohort of 42 patients, there was no significant difference in AVM obliteration (Frame-based vs Frameless, log-rank p = 0.984). CONCLUSION: Frameless and frame-based LINAC SRS have comparable efficacy in intracranial AVM obliteration. A longer follow-up duration may further characterize the rate of late adverse radiation effects in frameless SRS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10248791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102487912023-06-09 Frameless versus frame-based stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial arteriovenous malformations: A propensity-matched analysis He, Zhexi Ho, Man Kit Jason Lee, Wan Yan Venus Law, Hing Yuen Wong, Yee Wa Victy Leung, To-wai Mui, Wing Ho Wong, Sui-To Wong, Chi Sing Frank Yam, Kwong Yui Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Original Research Article OBJECTIVE: The frameless linear accelerator (LINAC) based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been evolving with a reduction in patient discomfort. However, there was limited evidence comparing frame-based and frameless SRS for intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVM). We aimed to compare the treatment outcomes between frame-based and frameless LINAC SRS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort compared the outcomes of frame-based LINAC SRS (1998–2009) with frameless LINAC SRS (2010–2020). The primary outcome was the obliteration rate. The other outcomes included the neurological, radiological, and functional outcomes after SRS. A matched cohort was identified by propensity scores for further comparisons. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients were included with a mean follow-up time of 13.2 years (158.5 months). There were 40 patients in the frame-based group and 25 patients in the frameless group. The overall obliteration rate was comparable (Frame-based 82.5% vs Frameless 80.0%, p = 0.310) and not significantly different over time (log-rank p = 0.536). The crude post-SRS hemorrhage rate was 1.5% and the incidence was 0.3 per 100 person-years. There were 67.7% of patients with AVM obliteration without new persistent neurological deficits at the last visit and 56.9% of patients with AVM obliteration without any deficits (transient or persistent) during the entire follow-up period. Four patients (8.0%) developed late onset persistent adverse radiation effects (more than 96 months after SRS) among 50 patients with more than 8-year surveillance. In the propensity-matched cohort of 42 patients, there was no significant difference in AVM obliteration (Frame-based vs Frameless, log-rank p = 0.984). CONCLUSION: Frameless and frame-based LINAC SRS have comparable efficacy in intracranial AVM obliteration. A longer follow-up duration may further characterize the rate of late adverse radiation effects in frameless SRS. Elsevier 2023-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10248791/ /pubmed/37304170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100642 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
He, Zhexi
Ho, Man Kit Jason
Lee, Wan Yan Venus
Law, Hing Yuen
Wong, Yee Wa Victy
Leung, To-wai
Mui, Wing Ho
Wong, Sui-To
Wong, Chi Sing Frank
Yam, Kwong Yui
Frameless versus frame-based stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial arteriovenous malformations: A propensity-matched analysis
title Frameless versus frame-based stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial arteriovenous malformations: A propensity-matched analysis
title_full Frameless versus frame-based stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial arteriovenous malformations: A propensity-matched analysis
title_fullStr Frameless versus frame-based stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial arteriovenous malformations: A propensity-matched analysis
title_full_unstemmed Frameless versus frame-based stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial arteriovenous malformations: A propensity-matched analysis
title_short Frameless versus frame-based stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial arteriovenous malformations: A propensity-matched analysis
title_sort frameless versus frame-based stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial arteriovenous malformations: a propensity-matched analysis
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10248791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37304170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100642
work_keys_str_mv AT hezhexi framelessversusframebasedstereotacticradiosurgeryforintracranialarteriovenousmalformationsapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT homankitjason framelessversusframebasedstereotacticradiosurgeryforintracranialarteriovenousmalformationsapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT leewanyanvenus framelessversusframebasedstereotacticradiosurgeryforintracranialarteriovenousmalformationsapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT lawhingyuen framelessversusframebasedstereotacticradiosurgeryforintracranialarteriovenousmalformationsapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT wongyeewavicty framelessversusframebasedstereotacticradiosurgeryforintracranialarteriovenousmalformationsapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT leungtowai framelessversusframebasedstereotacticradiosurgeryforintracranialarteriovenousmalformationsapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT muiwingho framelessversusframebasedstereotacticradiosurgeryforintracranialarteriovenousmalformationsapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT wongsuito framelessversusframebasedstereotacticradiosurgeryforintracranialarteriovenousmalformationsapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT wongchisingfrank framelessversusframebasedstereotacticradiosurgeryforintracranialarteriovenousmalformationsapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT yamkwongyui framelessversusframebasedstereotacticradiosurgeryforintracranialarteriovenousmalformationsapropensitymatchedanalysis