Cargando…

The impact of primary patella resurfacing on health-related quality of life outcomes and return to sport in total knee arthroplasty (TKA)

INTRODUCTION: Primary patella resurfacing (PPR) in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a topic without clear clinical evidence. Using Patient Reported Outcome Measurements (PROM), previous work found TKA patients without PPR to have more pain postoperatively, but little is known whether this ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schatz, Caroline, Plötz, Werner, Beckmann, Johannes, Leidl, Reiner, Buschner, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10248965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37289223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04930-x
_version_ 1785055461842616320
author Schatz, Caroline
Plötz, Werner
Beckmann, Johannes
Leidl, Reiner
Buschner, Peter
author_facet Schatz, Caroline
Plötz, Werner
Beckmann, Johannes
Leidl, Reiner
Buschner, Peter
author_sort Schatz, Caroline
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Primary patella resurfacing (PPR) in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a topic without clear clinical evidence. Using Patient Reported Outcome Measurements (PROM), previous work found TKA patients without PPR to have more pain postoperatively, but little is known whether this may impede patients from returning to their usual leisure sport. This observational study aimed at evaluating the treatment effect of PPR, with PROMs and return to sport (RTS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 156 primary TKA patients were retrospectively included from August 2019 to November 2020, from a single hospital in Germany. PROMs were measured with the Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the EuroQoL Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS), preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. Leisure sport with three levels of intensity (never, sometimes, regular) were requested. The treatment effect of PPR was evaluated with a difference-in-difference (DiD) approach, with several confounders. RESULTS: Descriptively, the mean WOMAC total score and the mean WOMAC pain score were postoperatively better with PPR, ( – 4.8 points,  – 1.1 points), then without PPR. The mean improvements of the WOMAC total score were better with PPR ( – 7.8 points). Mean improvements for the WOMAC pain score were also better with PPR ( – 1.2 points). Mean EQ-VAS were postoperatively similar, and the mean improvements were better with PPR (3.4 points). Rate of RTS was 93% for patients with PPR and 95% for patients without PPR. The DiD revealed minor differences in PROMs and RTS, not to result in statistically significant treatment effects. CONCLUSIONS: There was no treatment effect for TKA with PPR, regarding PROMs and RTS, and descriptive differences were below published thresholds for clinical relevance. Rate of RTS was high for all patients, regardless of PPR. For the two endpoint categories, there was no measurable advantage of TKA with PPR over TKA without PPR. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00402-023-04930-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10248965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102489652023-06-12 The impact of primary patella resurfacing on health-related quality of life outcomes and return to sport in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) Schatz, Caroline Plötz, Werner Beckmann, Johannes Leidl, Reiner Buschner, Peter Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Knee Arthroplasty INTRODUCTION: Primary patella resurfacing (PPR) in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a topic without clear clinical evidence. Using Patient Reported Outcome Measurements (PROM), previous work found TKA patients without PPR to have more pain postoperatively, but little is known whether this may impede patients from returning to their usual leisure sport. This observational study aimed at evaluating the treatment effect of PPR, with PROMs and return to sport (RTS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 156 primary TKA patients were retrospectively included from August 2019 to November 2020, from a single hospital in Germany. PROMs were measured with the Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the EuroQoL Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS), preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. Leisure sport with three levels of intensity (never, sometimes, regular) were requested. The treatment effect of PPR was evaluated with a difference-in-difference (DiD) approach, with several confounders. RESULTS: Descriptively, the mean WOMAC total score and the mean WOMAC pain score were postoperatively better with PPR, ( – 4.8 points,  – 1.1 points), then without PPR. The mean improvements of the WOMAC total score were better with PPR ( – 7.8 points). Mean improvements for the WOMAC pain score were also better with PPR ( – 1.2 points). Mean EQ-VAS were postoperatively similar, and the mean improvements were better with PPR (3.4 points). Rate of RTS was 93% for patients with PPR and 95% for patients without PPR. The DiD revealed minor differences in PROMs and RTS, not to result in statistically significant treatment effects. CONCLUSIONS: There was no treatment effect for TKA with PPR, regarding PROMs and RTS, and descriptive differences were below published thresholds for clinical relevance. Rate of RTS was high for all patients, regardless of PPR. For the two endpoint categories, there was no measurable advantage of TKA with PPR over TKA without PPR. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00402-023-04930-x. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-06-08 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10248965/ /pubmed/37289223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04930-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Knee Arthroplasty
Schatz, Caroline
Plötz, Werner
Beckmann, Johannes
Leidl, Reiner
Buschner, Peter
The impact of primary patella resurfacing on health-related quality of life outcomes and return to sport in total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
title The impact of primary patella resurfacing on health-related quality of life outcomes and return to sport in total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
title_full The impact of primary patella resurfacing on health-related quality of life outcomes and return to sport in total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
title_fullStr The impact of primary patella resurfacing on health-related quality of life outcomes and return to sport in total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
title_full_unstemmed The impact of primary patella resurfacing on health-related quality of life outcomes and return to sport in total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
title_short The impact of primary patella resurfacing on health-related quality of life outcomes and return to sport in total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
title_sort impact of primary patella resurfacing on health-related quality of life outcomes and return to sport in total knee arthroplasty (tka)
topic Knee Arthroplasty
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10248965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37289223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04930-x
work_keys_str_mv AT schatzcaroline theimpactofprimarypatellaresurfacingonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeoutcomesandreturntosportintotalkneearthroplastytka
AT plotzwerner theimpactofprimarypatellaresurfacingonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeoutcomesandreturntosportintotalkneearthroplastytka
AT beckmannjohannes theimpactofprimarypatellaresurfacingonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeoutcomesandreturntosportintotalkneearthroplastytka
AT leidlreiner theimpactofprimarypatellaresurfacingonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeoutcomesandreturntosportintotalkneearthroplastytka
AT buschnerpeter theimpactofprimarypatellaresurfacingonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeoutcomesandreturntosportintotalkneearthroplastytka
AT schatzcaroline impactofprimarypatellaresurfacingonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeoutcomesandreturntosportintotalkneearthroplastytka
AT plotzwerner impactofprimarypatellaresurfacingonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeoutcomesandreturntosportintotalkneearthroplastytka
AT beckmannjohannes impactofprimarypatellaresurfacingonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeoutcomesandreturntosportintotalkneearthroplastytka
AT leidlreiner impactofprimarypatellaresurfacingonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeoutcomesandreturntosportintotalkneearthroplastytka
AT buschnerpeter impactofprimarypatellaresurfacingonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeoutcomesandreturntosportintotalkneearthroplastytka