Cargando…
Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews
Data continue to accumulate indicating that many systematic reviews are methodologically flawed, biased, redundant, or uninformative. Some improvements have occurred in recent years based on empirical methods research and standardization of appraisal tools; however, many authors do not routinely or...
Autores principales: | Kolaski, Kat, Logan, Lynne Romeiser, Ioannidis, John P. A. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10248995/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37291658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02255-9 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews
por: Kolaski, Kat, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews(1)
por: Kolaski, Kat, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews
por: Kolaski, Kat, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Guidance to Best Tools and Practices for Systematic Reviews
por: Kolaski, Kat, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
British Society of Gastroenterology Best Practice Guidance: outpatient management of cirrhosis – part 3: special circumstances
por: Mansour, Dina, et al.
Publicado: (2023)