Cargando…
Combining multiple data sources with different biases in state‐space models for population dynamics
1. The resolution at which animal populations can be modeled can be increased when multiple datasets corresponding to different life stages are available, allowing, for example, seasonal instead of annual descriptions of dynamics. However, the abundance estimates used for model fitting can have mult...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10249046/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37304369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10154 |
_version_ | 1785055478116515840 |
---|---|
author | Polansky, Leo Mitchell, Lara Newman, Ken B. |
author_facet | Polansky, Leo Mitchell, Lara Newman, Ken B. |
author_sort | Polansky, Leo |
collection | PubMed |
description | 1. The resolution at which animal populations can be modeled can be increased when multiple datasets corresponding to different life stages are available, allowing, for example, seasonal instead of annual descriptions of dynamics. However, the abundance estimates used for model fitting can have multiple sources of error, both random and systematic, namely bias. We focus here on the consequences of, and how to address, differing and unknown observation biases when fitting models. 2. State‐space models (SSMs) separate process variation and observation error, thus providing a framework to account for different and unknown estimate biases across multiple datasets. Here we study the effects on the inference of including or excluding bias parameters for a sequential life stage population dynamics SSM using a combination of theory, simulation experiments, and an empirical example. 3. When the data, that is, abundance estimates, are unbiased, including bias parameters leads to increased imprecision compared to a model that correctly excludes bias parameters. But when observations are biased and no bias parameters are estimated, recruitment and survival processes are inaccurately estimated and estimates of process variance become biased high. These problems are substantially reduced by including bias parameters and fixing one of them at even an incorrect value. The primary inferential challenge is that models with bias parameters can show properties of being parameter redundant even when they are not in theory. 4. Combining multiple datasets into a single analysis by using bias parameters to rescale data can offer significant improvements to inference and model diagnostics. Because their estimability in practice is dataset specific and will likely require more precise estimates than might be expected from ecological datasets, we outline some strategies for characterizing process uncertainty when it is confounded by bias parameters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10249046 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102490462023-06-09 Combining multiple data sources with different biases in state‐space models for population dynamics Polansky, Leo Mitchell, Lara Newman, Ken B. Ecol Evol Research Articles 1. The resolution at which animal populations can be modeled can be increased when multiple datasets corresponding to different life stages are available, allowing, for example, seasonal instead of annual descriptions of dynamics. However, the abundance estimates used for model fitting can have multiple sources of error, both random and systematic, namely bias. We focus here on the consequences of, and how to address, differing and unknown observation biases when fitting models. 2. State‐space models (SSMs) separate process variation and observation error, thus providing a framework to account for different and unknown estimate biases across multiple datasets. Here we study the effects on the inference of including or excluding bias parameters for a sequential life stage population dynamics SSM using a combination of theory, simulation experiments, and an empirical example. 3. When the data, that is, abundance estimates, are unbiased, including bias parameters leads to increased imprecision compared to a model that correctly excludes bias parameters. But when observations are biased and no bias parameters are estimated, recruitment and survival processes are inaccurately estimated and estimates of process variance become biased high. These problems are substantially reduced by including bias parameters and fixing one of them at even an incorrect value. The primary inferential challenge is that models with bias parameters can show properties of being parameter redundant even when they are not in theory. 4. Combining multiple datasets into a single analysis by using bias parameters to rescale data can offer significant improvements to inference and model diagnostics. Because their estimability in practice is dataset specific and will likely require more precise estimates than might be expected from ecological datasets, we outline some strategies for characterizing process uncertainty when it is confounded by bias parameters. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10249046/ /pubmed/37304369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10154 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Polansky, Leo Mitchell, Lara Newman, Ken B. Combining multiple data sources with different biases in state‐space models for population dynamics |
title | Combining multiple data sources with different biases in state‐space models for population dynamics |
title_full | Combining multiple data sources with different biases in state‐space models for population dynamics |
title_fullStr | Combining multiple data sources with different biases in state‐space models for population dynamics |
title_full_unstemmed | Combining multiple data sources with different biases in state‐space models for population dynamics |
title_short | Combining multiple data sources with different biases in state‐space models for population dynamics |
title_sort | combining multiple data sources with different biases in state‐space models for population dynamics |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10249046/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37304369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10154 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT polanskyleo combiningmultipledatasourceswithdifferentbiasesinstatespacemodelsforpopulationdynamics AT mitchelllara combiningmultipledatasourceswithdifferentbiasesinstatespacemodelsforpopulationdynamics AT newmankenb combiningmultipledatasourceswithdifferentbiasesinstatespacemodelsforpopulationdynamics |