Cargando…
Values and practice of collaboration in a mental health care system in the Netherlands: a qualitative study
BACKGROUND: To offer optimal care, the mental health system needs new routes for collaboration, involving both interprofessional and interorganizational aspects. The transition from intramural to extramural mental health care has given rise to new dynamics between public and mental health care, intr...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10249202/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37291607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13033-023-00584-9 |
_version_ | 1785055510759735296 |
---|---|
author | Kroon, Suzanne J.C. Alma, Manna A. Bak, Meike van der Krieke, Lian Bruggeman, Richard |
author_facet | Kroon, Suzanne J.C. Alma, Manna A. Bak, Meike van der Krieke, Lian Bruggeman, Richard |
author_sort | Kroon, Suzanne J.C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To offer optimal care, the mental health system needs new routes for collaboration, involving both interprofessional and interorganizational aspects. The transition from intramural to extramural mental health care has given rise to new dynamics between public and mental health care, introducing a challenge for interprofessional and interorganizational collaboration. This study aims to determine values and expectations of collaboration and to understand how collaboration in mental health care organizations takes shape in daily practice. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and a focus group, in the setting of the Program for Mentally Vulnerable Persons (PMV). Data were analysed following thematic analysis. RESULTS: We found three aspect that were considered important in collaboration: commonality, relationships, and psychological ownership. However, our findings indicate a discrepancy between what is considered essential in collaboration and how this materializes in day-to-day practice: collaboration appears to be less manageable than anticipated by interviewees. Our data suggest psychological ownership should be added as value to the interorganizational collaboration theory. CONCLUSION: Our study offers a new definition of collaboration and adding “psychological ownership” to the existing literature on collaboration theory. Furthermore, we gained insight into how collaboration between different organizations works in practice. Our research points to a discrepancy between what all the partners find important in collaboration, and what they actually do in practice. Finally, we expressed ways to improve the collaboration, such as choosing between a chain or a network approach and acting on it and re-highlighting the goal of the Program Mentally Vulnerable persons. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13033-023-00584-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10249202 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102492022023-06-09 Values and practice of collaboration in a mental health care system in the Netherlands: a qualitative study Kroon, Suzanne J.C. Alma, Manna A. Bak, Meike van der Krieke, Lian Bruggeman, Richard Int J Ment Health Syst Research BACKGROUND: To offer optimal care, the mental health system needs new routes for collaboration, involving both interprofessional and interorganizational aspects. The transition from intramural to extramural mental health care has given rise to new dynamics between public and mental health care, introducing a challenge for interprofessional and interorganizational collaboration. This study aims to determine values and expectations of collaboration and to understand how collaboration in mental health care organizations takes shape in daily practice. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and a focus group, in the setting of the Program for Mentally Vulnerable Persons (PMV). Data were analysed following thematic analysis. RESULTS: We found three aspect that were considered important in collaboration: commonality, relationships, and psychological ownership. However, our findings indicate a discrepancy between what is considered essential in collaboration and how this materializes in day-to-day practice: collaboration appears to be less manageable than anticipated by interviewees. Our data suggest psychological ownership should be added as value to the interorganizational collaboration theory. CONCLUSION: Our study offers a new definition of collaboration and adding “psychological ownership” to the existing literature on collaboration theory. Furthermore, we gained insight into how collaboration between different organizations works in practice. Our research points to a discrepancy between what all the partners find important in collaboration, and what they actually do in practice. Finally, we expressed ways to improve the collaboration, such as choosing between a chain or a network approach and acting on it and re-highlighting the goal of the Program Mentally Vulnerable persons. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13033-023-00584-9. BioMed Central 2023-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10249202/ /pubmed/37291607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13033-023-00584-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Kroon, Suzanne J.C. Alma, Manna A. Bak, Meike van der Krieke, Lian Bruggeman, Richard Values and practice of collaboration in a mental health care system in the Netherlands: a qualitative study |
title | Values and practice of collaboration in a mental health care system in the Netherlands: a qualitative study |
title_full | Values and practice of collaboration in a mental health care system in the Netherlands: a qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Values and practice of collaboration in a mental health care system in the Netherlands: a qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Values and practice of collaboration in a mental health care system in the Netherlands: a qualitative study |
title_short | Values and practice of collaboration in a mental health care system in the Netherlands: a qualitative study |
title_sort | values and practice of collaboration in a mental health care system in the netherlands: a qualitative study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10249202/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37291607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13033-023-00584-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kroonsuzannejc valuesandpracticeofcollaborationinamentalhealthcaresysteminthenetherlandsaqualitativestudy AT almamannaa valuesandpracticeofcollaborationinamentalhealthcaresysteminthenetherlandsaqualitativestudy AT bakmeike valuesandpracticeofcollaborationinamentalhealthcaresysteminthenetherlandsaqualitativestudy AT vanderkriekelian valuesandpracticeofcollaborationinamentalhealthcaresysteminthenetherlandsaqualitativestudy AT bruggemanrichard valuesandpracticeofcollaborationinamentalhealthcaresysteminthenetherlandsaqualitativestudy |