Cargando…

Range of motion of the mid-cervical spine: human versus goat

BACKGROUND: The goat cervical spine represents a promising alternative for human specimen in spinal implant testing, but the range of motion (ROM) of the spine is lacking. We aimed to evaluate and compare the ROMs of fresh goat and human mid-cervical spine specimens. METHODS: Ten fresh adult healthy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dong, Jun, Zhang, Gelin, Sun, Yuan, Li, Xi, Zhang, Xuyan, Liu, Min, Liu, Ruoxi, Fan, Liying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10249303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37291606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03896-1
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The goat cervical spine represents a promising alternative for human specimen in spinal implant testing, but the range of motion (ROM) of the spine is lacking. We aimed to evaluate and compare the ROMs of fresh goat and human mid-cervical spine specimens. METHODS: Ten fresh adult healthy male goat cervical spine specimens (G group) and ten fresh frozen adult healthy human cervical spine specimens (average age: 49.5 ± 12.1 years; 6 males, 4 females) (H group) were included. The ROMs of each specimen were biomechanically tested at the C(2–3), C(3–4), C(4–5) and C(2–5) levels at 1.5 Nm and 2.5 Nm torque and recorded. The ROMs of different levels of goat cervical samples were compared to those of human cervical samples using an independent sample t test. Significance was defined as a P value of less than 0.05. RESULTS: At the C(2–3), C(3–4) and C(4–5) levels, the ROMs of the goat cervical spine were significantly larger than those of the human cervical spine in all directions except extension under 1.5 Nm torque; under 2.5 Nm torque, the ROMs of the goat cervical spine at the C(2–3) and C(3–4) levels were significantly larger than those of humans in the pure movement of flexion, lateral bending and axial rotation, and the ROMs for axial rotation of the goat specimens and human specimens were comparable. Under both 1.5 Nm and 2.5 Nm torque, the goat cervical spine displayed a much greater ROM in all directions at the C(2–5) level. CONCLUSIONS: Several segmental ROMs of fresh goat and human cervical spine specimens were recorded in this investigation. We recommend using goat cervical specimens as an alternative to fresh human cervical specimens in future studies when focusing only on the ROMs of C(2–3), C(3–4) and C(4–5) in flexion under a torque of 1.5 Nm or the ROMs of C(2–3) and C(3–4) in flexion and rotation under a torque of 2.5 Nm. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-023-03896-1.