Cargando…

A randomized controlled trial of iliopsoas plane block vs. femoral nerve block for hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: Iliopsoas plane block (IPB) is a novel analgesic technique for hip surgery that retains quadriceps strength. However, evidence from randomized controlled trial is remains unavailable. We hypothesized that IPB, as a motor-sparing analgesic technique, could match the femoral nerve block (F...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Chun-guang, Zhang, Zhi-qiang, Yang, Yang, Long, Yu-bin, Wang, Xiu-li, Ding, Yan-ling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10249315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37291487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02162-5
_version_ 1785055534844477440
author Wang, Chun-guang
Zhang, Zhi-qiang
Yang, Yang
Long, Yu-bin
Wang, Xiu-li
Ding, Yan-ling
author_facet Wang, Chun-guang
Zhang, Zhi-qiang
Yang, Yang
Long, Yu-bin
Wang, Xiu-li
Ding, Yan-ling
author_sort Wang, Chun-guang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Iliopsoas plane block (IPB) is a novel analgesic technique for hip surgery that retains quadriceps strength. However, evidence from randomized controlled trial is remains unavailable. We hypothesized that IPB, as a motor-sparing analgesic technique, could match the femoral nerve block (FNB) in pain management and morphine consumption, providing an advantage for earlier functional training in patients underwent hip arthroplasty. METHODS: We recruited ninety patients with femoral neck fracture, femoral head necrosis or hip osteoarthritis who were scheduled for unilateral primary hip arthroplasty were recruited and received either IPB or FNB. Primary outcome was the pain score during hip flexion at 4 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included quadriceps strength and pain scores upon arrival at post anesthesia care unit (PACU) and at 2, 4, 6, 24, 48 h after surgery, the first time out of bed, total opioids consumption, patient satisfaction, and complications. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in terms of pain score during hip flexion at 4 h after surgery between the IPB group and FNB group. The quadriceps strength of patients receiving IPB was superior to those receiving FNB upon arrival at PACU and at 2, 4, 6 and 24 h after surgery. The IPB group showed a shorter first time out of bed compared to the FNB group. However, there were no significant differences in terms of pain scores within 48 h after surgery, total opioids consumption, patient satisfaction and complications between the two groups. CONCLUSION: IPB was not superior to FNB in terms of postoperative analgesia for hip arthroplasty. However, IPB could serve as an effective motor-sparing analgesic technique for hip arthroplasty, which would facilitate early recovery and rehabilitation. This makes IPB worth considering as an alternative to FNB. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered prior to patient enrollment at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200055493; registration date: January 10, 2022; enrollment date: January 18, 2022; https://www.chictr.org.cn/searchprojEN.html).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10249315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102493152023-06-09 A randomized controlled trial of iliopsoas plane block vs. femoral nerve block for hip arthroplasty Wang, Chun-guang Zhang, Zhi-qiang Yang, Yang Long, Yu-bin Wang, Xiu-li Ding, Yan-ling BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: Iliopsoas plane block (IPB) is a novel analgesic technique for hip surgery that retains quadriceps strength. However, evidence from randomized controlled trial is remains unavailable. We hypothesized that IPB, as a motor-sparing analgesic technique, could match the femoral nerve block (FNB) in pain management and morphine consumption, providing an advantage for earlier functional training in patients underwent hip arthroplasty. METHODS: We recruited ninety patients with femoral neck fracture, femoral head necrosis or hip osteoarthritis who were scheduled for unilateral primary hip arthroplasty were recruited and received either IPB or FNB. Primary outcome was the pain score during hip flexion at 4 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included quadriceps strength and pain scores upon arrival at post anesthesia care unit (PACU) and at 2, 4, 6, 24, 48 h after surgery, the first time out of bed, total opioids consumption, patient satisfaction, and complications. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in terms of pain score during hip flexion at 4 h after surgery between the IPB group and FNB group. The quadriceps strength of patients receiving IPB was superior to those receiving FNB upon arrival at PACU and at 2, 4, 6 and 24 h after surgery. The IPB group showed a shorter first time out of bed compared to the FNB group. However, there were no significant differences in terms of pain scores within 48 h after surgery, total opioids consumption, patient satisfaction and complications between the two groups. CONCLUSION: IPB was not superior to FNB in terms of postoperative analgesia for hip arthroplasty. However, IPB could serve as an effective motor-sparing analgesic technique for hip arthroplasty, which would facilitate early recovery and rehabilitation. This makes IPB worth considering as an alternative to FNB. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered prior to patient enrollment at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200055493; registration date: January 10, 2022; enrollment date: January 18, 2022; https://www.chictr.org.cn/searchprojEN.html). BioMed Central 2023-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10249315/ /pubmed/37291487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02162-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wang, Chun-guang
Zhang, Zhi-qiang
Yang, Yang
Long, Yu-bin
Wang, Xiu-li
Ding, Yan-ling
A randomized controlled trial of iliopsoas plane block vs. femoral nerve block for hip arthroplasty
title A randomized controlled trial of iliopsoas plane block vs. femoral nerve block for hip arthroplasty
title_full A randomized controlled trial of iliopsoas plane block vs. femoral nerve block for hip arthroplasty
title_fullStr A randomized controlled trial of iliopsoas plane block vs. femoral nerve block for hip arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed A randomized controlled trial of iliopsoas plane block vs. femoral nerve block for hip arthroplasty
title_short A randomized controlled trial of iliopsoas plane block vs. femoral nerve block for hip arthroplasty
title_sort randomized controlled trial of iliopsoas plane block vs. femoral nerve block for hip arthroplasty
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10249315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37291487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02162-5
work_keys_str_mv AT wangchunguang arandomizedcontrolledtrialofiliopsoasplaneblockvsfemoralnerveblockforhiparthroplasty
AT zhangzhiqiang arandomizedcontrolledtrialofiliopsoasplaneblockvsfemoralnerveblockforhiparthroplasty
AT yangyang arandomizedcontrolledtrialofiliopsoasplaneblockvsfemoralnerveblockforhiparthroplasty
AT longyubin arandomizedcontrolledtrialofiliopsoasplaneblockvsfemoralnerveblockforhiparthroplasty
AT wangxiuli arandomizedcontrolledtrialofiliopsoasplaneblockvsfemoralnerveblockforhiparthroplasty
AT dingyanling arandomizedcontrolledtrialofiliopsoasplaneblockvsfemoralnerveblockforhiparthroplasty
AT wangchunguang randomizedcontrolledtrialofiliopsoasplaneblockvsfemoralnerveblockforhiparthroplasty
AT zhangzhiqiang randomizedcontrolledtrialofiliopsoasplaneblockvsfemoralnerveblockforhiparthroplasty
AT yangyang randomizedcontrolledtrialofiliopsoasplaneblockvsfemoralnerveblockforhiparthroplasty
AT longyubin randomizedcontrolledtrialofiliopsoasplaneblockvsfemoralnerveblockforhiparthroplasty
AT wangxiuli randomizedcontrolledtrialofiliopsoasplaneblockvsfemoralnerveblockforhiparthroplasty
AT dingyanling randomizedcontrolledtrialofiliopsoasplaneblockvsfemoralnerveblockforhiparthroplasty