Cargando…
A randomized controlled trial of iliopsoas plane block vs. femoral nerve block for hip arthroplasty
BACKGROUND: Iliopsoas plane block (IPB) is a novel analgesic technique for hip surgery that retains quadriceps strength. However, evidence from randomized controlled trial is remains unavailable. We hypothesized that IPB, as a motor-sparing analgesic technique, could match the femoral nerve block (F...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10249315/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37291487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02162-5 |
_version_ | 1785055534844477440 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Chun-guang Zhang, Zhi-qiang Yang, Yang Long, Yu-bin Wang, Xiu-li Ding, Yan-ling |
author_facet | Wang, Chun-guang Zhang, Zhi-qiang Yang, Yang Long, Yu-bin Wang, Xiu-li Ding, Yan-ling |
author_sort | Wang, Chun-guang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Iliopsoas plane block (IPB) is a novel analgesic technique for hip surgery that retains quadriceps strength. However, evidence from randomized controlled trial is remains unavailable. We hypothesized that IPB, as a motor-sparing analgesic technique, could match the femoral nerve block (FNB) in pain management and morphine consumption, providing an advantage for earlier functional training in patients underwent hip arthroplasty. METHODS: We recruited ninety patients with femoral neck fracture, femoral head necrosis or hip osteoarthritis who were scheduled for unilateral primary hip arthroplasty were recruited and received either IPB or FNB. Primary outcome was the pain score during hip flexion at 4 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included quadriceps strength and pain scores upon arrival at post anesthesia care unit (PACU) and at 2, 4, 6, 24, 48 h after surgery, the first time out of bed, total opioids consumption, patient satisfaction, and complications. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in terms of pain score during hip flexion at 4 h after surgery between the IPB group and FNB group. The quadriceps strength of patients receiving IPB was superior to those receiving FNB upon arrival at PACU and at 2, 4, 6 and 24 h after surgery. The IPB group showed a shorter first time out of bed compared to the FNB group. However, there were no significant differences in terms of pain scores within 48 h after surgery, total opioids consumption, patient satisfaction and complications between the two groups. CONCLUSION: IPB was not superior to FNB in terms of postoperative analgesia for hip arthroplasty. However, IPB could serve as an effective motor-sparing analgesic technique for hip arthroplasty, which would facilitate early recovery and rehabilitation. This makes IPB worth considering as an alternative to FNB. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered prior to patient enrollment at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200055493; registration date: January 10, 2022; enrollment date: January 18, 2022; https://www.chictr.org.cn/searchprojEN.html). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10249315 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102493152023-06-09 A randomized controlled trial of iliopsoas plane block vs. femoral nerve block for hip arthroplasty Wang, Chun-guang Zhang, Zhi-qiang Yang, Yang Long, Yu-bin Wang, Xiu-li Ding, Yan-ling BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: Iliopsoas plane block (IPB) is a novel analgesic technique for hip surgery that retains quadriceps strength. However, evidence from randomized controlled trial is remains unavailable. We hypothesized that IPB, as a motor-sparing analgesic technique, could match the femoral nerve block (FNB) in pain management and morphine consumption, providing an advantage for earlier functional training in patients underwent hip arthroplasty. METHODS: We recruited ninety patients with femoral neck fracture, femoral head necrosis or hip osteoarthritis who were scheduled for unilateral primary hip arthroplasty were recruited and received either IPB or FNB. Primary outcome was the pain score during hip flexion at 4 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included quadriceps strength and pain scores upon arrival at post anesthesia care unit (PACU) and at 2, 4, 6, 24, 48 h after surgery, the first time out of bed, total opioids consumption, patient satisfaction, and complications. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in terms of pain score during hip flexion at 4 h after surgery between the IPB group and FNB group. The quadriceps strength of patients receiving IPB was superior to those receiving FNB upon arrival at PACU and at 2, 4, 6 and 24 h after surgery. The IPB group showed a shorter first time out of bed compared to the FNB group. However, there were no significant differences in terms of pain scores within 48 h after surgery, total opioids consumption, patient satisfaction and complications between the two groups. CONCLUSION: IPB was not superior to FNB in terms of postoperative analgesia for hip arthroplasty. However, IPB could serve as an effective motor-sparing analgesic technique for hip arthroplasty, which would facilitate early recovery and rehabilitation. This makes IPB worth considering as an alternative to FNB. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered prior to patient enrollment at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200055493; registration date: January 10, 2022; enrollment date: January 18, 2022; https://www.chictr.org.cn/searchprojEN.html). BioMed Central 2023-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10249315/ /pubmed/37291487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02162-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Wang, Chun-guang Zhang, Zhi-qiang Yang, Yang Long, Yu-bin Wang, Xiu-li Ding, Yan-ling A randomized controlled trial of iliopsoas plane block vs. femoral nerve block for hip arthroplasty |
title | A randomized controlled trial of iliopsoas plane block vs. femoral nerve block for hip arthroplasty |
title_full | A randomized controlled trial of iliopsoas plane block vs. femoral nerve block for hip arthroplasty |
title_fullStr | A randomized controlled trial of iliopsoas plane block vs. femoral nerve block for hip arthroplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized controlled trial of iliopsoas plane block vs. femoral nerve block for hip arthroplasty |
title_short | A randomized controlled trial of iliopsoas plane block vs. femoral nerve block for hip arthroplasty |
title_sort | randomized controlled trial of iliopsoas plane block vs. femoral nerve block for hip arthroplasty |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10249315/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37291487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02162-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangchunguang arandomizedcontrolledtrialofiliopsoasplaneblockvsfemoralnerveblockforhiparthroplasty AT zhangzhiqiang arandomizedcontrolledtrialofiliopsoasplaneblockvsfemoralnerveblockforhiparthroplasty AT yangyang arandomizedcontrolledtrialofiliopsoasplaneblockvsfemoralnerveblockforhiparthroplasty AT longyubin arandomizedcontrolledtrialofiliopsoasplaneblockvsfemoralnerveblockforhiparthroplasty AT wangxiuli arandomizedcontrolledtrialofiliopsoasplaneblockvsfemoralnerveblockforhiparthroplasty AT dingyanling arandomizedcontrolledtrialofiliopsoasplaneblockvsfemoralnerveblockforhiparthroplasty AT wangchunguang randomizedcontrolledtrialofiliopsoasplaneblockvsfemoralnerveblockforhiparthroplasty AT zhangzhiqiang randomizedcontrolledtrialofiliopsoasplaneblockvsfemoralnerveblockforhiparthroplasty AT yangyang randomizedcontrolledtrialofiliopsoasplaneblockvsfemoralnerveblockforhiparthroplasty AT longyubin randomizedcontrolledtrialofiliopsoasplaneblockvsfemoralnerveblockforhiparthroplasty AT wangxiuli randomizedcontrolledtrialofiliopsoasplaneblockvsfemoralnerveblockforhiparthroplasty AT dingyanling randomizedcontrolledtrialofiliopsoasplaneblockvsfemoralnerveblockforhiparthroplasty |