Cargando…

Safety of continuous intraoperative vagus nerve neuromonitoring during thyroid surgery

BACKGROUND: Continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring has successfully demonstrated to predict impending damage to the recurrent laryngeal nerve, by detecting changes in electromyographic recordings. Despite the apparent benefits associated with continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring, its safety...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mathieson, Timothy, Jimaja, Wedali, Triponez, Frédéric, Licker, Marc, Karenovics, Wolfram, Makovac, Petra, Muradbegovic, Mirza, Belfontali, Valentina, Bédat, Benoît, Demarchi, Marco Stefano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10249491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37289251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrad039
_version_ 1785055570761351168
author Mathieson, Timothy
Jimaja, Wedali
Triponez, Frédéric
Licker, Marc
Karenovics, Wolfram
Makovac, Petra
Muradbegovic, Mirza
Belfontali, Valentina
Bédat, Benoît
Demarchi, Marco Stefano
author_facet Mathieson, Timothy
Jimaja, Wedali
Triponez, Frédéric
Licker, Marc
Karenovics, Wolfram
Makovac, Petra
Muradbegovic, Mirza
Belfontali, Valentina
Bédat, Benoît
Demarchi, Marco Stefano
author_sort Mathieson, Timothy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring has successfully demonstrated to predict impending damage to the recurrent laryngeal nerve, by detecting changes in electromyographic recordings. Despite the apparent benefits associated with continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring, its safety is still a debate. The aim of this study was to investigate the electrophysiological impact of continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring on the vagus nerve. METHODS: In this prospective study, the amplitude of the electromyographic wave of the vagus nerve–recurrent laryngeal nerve axis was measured both proximally and distally to the stimulation electrode placed upon the vagus nerve. Electromyographic signal amplitudes were collected at three distinct events during the operation: during the dissection of the vagus nerve, before application of the continuous stimulation electrode onto the vagus nerve and after its removal. RESULTS: In total, 169 vagus nerves were analysed, among 108 included patients undergoing continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring-enhanced endocrine neck surgeries. Electrode application resulted in a significant overall decrease in measured proximo-distal amplitudes of −10.94 µV (95 per cent c.i. −17.06 to −4.82 µV) (P < 0.005), corresponding to a mean(s.d.) decrease of −1.4(5.4) per cent. Before the removal of the electrode, the measured proximo-distal difference in amplitudes was −18.58 µV (95 per cent c.i. −28.31 to −8.86 µV) (P < 0.005), corresponding to a mean(s.d.) decrease of −2.50(9.59) per cent. Seven nerves suffered a loss of amplitude greater than 20 per cent of the baseline measurement. CONCLUSION: In addition to supporting claims that continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring exposes the vagus nerve to injury, this study shows a mild electrophysiological impact of continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring electrode placement on the vagus nerve–recurrent laryngeal nerve axis. However, the small observed differences are negligible and were not associated with a clinically relevant outcome, making continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring a safe adjunct in selected thyroid surgeries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10249491
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102494912023-06-09 Safety of continuous intraoperative vagus nerve neuromonitoring during thyroid surgery Mathieson, Timothy Jimaja, Wedali Triponez, Frédéric Licker, Marc Karenovics, Wolfram Makovac, Petra Muradbegovic, Mirza Belfontali, Valentina Bédat, Benoît Demarchi, Marco Stefano BJS Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring has successfully demonstrated to predict impending damage to the recurrent laryngeal nerve, by detecting changes in electromyographic recordings. Despite the apparent benefits associated with continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring, its safety is still a debate. The aim of this study was to investigate the electrophysiological impact of continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring on the vagus nerve. METHODS: In this prospective study, the amplitude of the electromyographic wave of the vagus nerve–recurrent laryngeal nerve axis was measured both proximally and distally to the stimulation electrode placed upon the vagus nerve. Electromyographic signal amplitudes were collected at three distinct events during the operation: during the dissection of the vagus nerve, before application of the continuous stimulation electrode onto the vagus nerve and after its removal. RESULTS: In total, 169 vagus nerves were analysed, among 108 included patients undergoing continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring-enhanced endocrine neck surgeries. Electrode application resulted in a significant overall decrease in measured proximo-distal amplitudes of −10.94 µV (95 per cent c.i. −17.06 to −4.82 µV) (P < 0.005), corresponding to a mean(s.d.) decrease of −1.4(5.4) per cent. Before the removal of the electrode, the measured proximo-distal difference in amplitudes was −18.58 µV (95 per cent c.i. −28.31 to −8.86 µV) (P < 0.005), corresponding to a mean(s.d.) decrease of −2.50(9.59) per cent. Seven nerves suffered a loss of amplitude greater than 20 per cent of the baseline measurement. CONCLUSION: In addition to supporting claims that continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring exposes the vagus nerve to injury, this study shows a mild electrophysiological impact of continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring electrode placement on the vagus nerve–recurrent laryngeal nerve axis. However, the small observed differences are negligible and were not associated with a clinically relevant outcome, making continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring a safe adjunct in selected thyroid surgeries. Oxford University Press 2023-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10249491/ /pubmed/37289251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrad039 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mathieson, Timothy
Jimaja, Wedali
Triponez, Frédéric
Licker, Marc
Karenovics, Wolfram
Makovac, Petra
Muradbegovic, Mirza
Belfontali, Valentina
Bédat, Benoît
Demarchi, Marco Stefano
Safety of continuous intraoperative vagus nerve neuromonitoring during thyroid surgery
title Safety of continuous intraoperative vagus nerve neuromonitoring during thyroid surgery
title_full Safety of continuous intraoperative vagus nerve neuromonitoring during thyroid surgery
title_fullStr Safety of continuous intraoperative vagus nerve neuromonitoring during thyroid surgery
title_full_unstemmed Safety of continuous intraoperative vagus nerve neuromonitoring during thyroid surgery
title_short Safety of continuous intraoperative vagus nerve neuromonitoring during thyroid surgery
title_sort safety of continuous intraoperative vagus nerve neuromonitoring during thyroid surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10249491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37289251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrad039
work_keys_str_mv AT mathiesontimothy safetyofcontinuousintraoperativevagusnerveneuromonitoringduringthyroidsurgery
AT jimajawedali safetyofcontinuousintraoperativevagusnerveneuromonitoringduringthyroidsurgery
AT triponezfrederic safetyofcontinuousintraoperativevagusnerveneuromonitoringduringthyroidsurgery
AT lickermarc safetyofcontinuousintraoperativevagusnerveneuromonitoringduringthyroidsurgery
AT karenovicswolfram safetyofcontinuousintraoperativevagusnerveneuromonitoringduringthyroidsurgery
AT makovacpetra safetyofcontinuousintraoperativevagusnerveneuromonitoringduringthyroidsurgery
AT muradbegovicmirza safetyofcontinuousintraoperativevagusnerveneuromonitoringduringthyroidsurgery
AT belfontalivalentina safetyofcontinuousintraoperativevagusnerveneuromonitoringduringthyroidsurgery
AT bedatbenoit safetyofcontinuousintraoperativevagusnerveneuromonitoringduringthyroidsurgery
AT demarchimarcostefano safetyofcontinuousintraoperativevagusnerveneuromonitoringduringthyroidsurgery