Cargando…
Assessing the comparability of cycle threshold values derived from five external quality assessment rounds for omicron nucleic acid testing
BACKGROUND: A variety of open-system real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays for several acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 are currently in use. This study aimed to ensure the quality of omicron nucleic acid testing and to assess the comparability of cycle th...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10249569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37291570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12985-023-02032-z |
_version_ | 1785055588118429696 |
---|---|
author | Fan, Gaowei Jin, Yali Wang, Qingtao Yue, Yuhong |
author_facet | Fan, Gaowei Jin, Yali Wang, Qingtao Yue, Yuhong |
author_sort | Fan, Gaowei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A variety of open-system real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays for several acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 are currently in use. This study aimed to ensure the quality of omicron nucleic acid testing and to assess the comparability of cycle threshold (Ct) values derived from RT-PCR. METHODS: Five external quality assessment (EQA) rounds using the omicron virus-like particles were organized between February 2022 and June 2022. RESULTS: A total of 1401 qualitative EQA reports have been collected. The overall positive percentage agreement was 99.72%, the negative percentage agreement was 99.75%, and the percent agreement was 99.73%. This study observed a significant variance in Ct values derived from different test systems. There was a wide heterogeneity in PCR efficiency among different RT-PCR kits and inter-laboratories. CONCLUSION: There was strong concordance among laboratories performing qualitative omicron nucleic acid testing. Ct values from qualitative RT-PCR tests should not be used for clinical or epidemiological decision-making to avoid the potential for misinterpretation of the results. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12985-023-02032-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10249569 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102495692023-06-10 Assessing the comparability of cycle threshold values derived from five external quality assessment rounds for omicron nucleic acid testing Fan, Gaowei Jin, Yali Wang, Qingtao Yue, Yuhong Virol J Research BACKGROUND: A variety of open-system real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays for several acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 are currently in use. This study aimed to ensure the quality of omicron nucleic acid testing and to assess the comparability of cycle threshold (Ct) values derived from RT-PCR. METHODS: Five external quality assessment (EQA) rounds using the omicron virus-like particles were organized between February 2022 and June 2022. RESULTS: A total of 1401 qualitative EQA reports have been collected. The overall positive percentage agreement was 99.72%, the negative percentage agreement was 99.75%, and the percent agreement was 99.73%. This study observed a significant variance in Ct values derived from different test systems. There was a wide heterogeneity in PCR efficiency among different RT-PCR kits and inter-laboratories. CONCLUSION: There was strong concordance among laboratories performing qualitative omicron nucleic acid testing. Ct values from qualitative RT-PCR tests should not be used for clinical or epidemiological decision-making to avoid the potential for misinterpretation of the results. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12985-023-02032-z. BioMed Central 2023-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10249569/ /pubmed/37291570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12985-023-02032-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Fan, Gaowei Jin, Yali Wang, Qingtao Yue, Yuhong Assessing the comparability of cycle threshold values derived from five external quality assessment rounds for omicron nucleic acid testing |
title | Assessing the comparability of cycle threshold values derived from five external quality assessment rounds for omicron nucleic acid testing |
title_full | Assessing the comparability of cycle threshold values derived from five external quality assessment rounds for omicron nucleic acid testing |
title_fullStr | Assessing the comparability of cycle threshold values derived from five external quality assessment rounds for omicron nucleic acid testing |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the comparability of cycle threshold values derived from five external quality assessment rounds for omicron nucleic acid testing |
title_short | Assessing the comparability of cycle threshold values derived from five external quality assessment rounds for omicron nucleic acid testing |
title_sort | assessing the comparability of cycle threshold values derived from five external quality assessment rounds for omicron nucleic acid testing |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10249569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37291570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12985-023-02032-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fangaowei assessingthecomparabilityofcyclethresholdvaluesderivedfromfiveexternalqualityassessmentroundsforomicronnucleicacidtesting AT jinyali assessingthecomparabilityofcyclethresholdvaluesderivedfromfiveexternalqualityassessmentroundsforomicronnucleicacidtesting AT wangqingtao assessingthecomparabilityofcyclethresholdvaluesderivedfromfiveexternalqualityassessmentroundsforomicronnucleicacidtesting AT yueyuhong assessingthecomparabilityofcyclethresholdvaluesderivedfromfiveexternalqualityassessmentroundsforomicronnucleicacidtesting |