Cargando…

A Comparative Assessment of the Some Commercially Available Portable Bipolar Air Ionizers Particulate Pollutants (PM(2.5), PM(10)) Removal Efficacies and Potential Byproduct Ozone Emission

Indoor air cleaning interventions such as bipolar air ionizers have increased lately due to rampant air pollution and the COVID-19 pandemic. Hitherto, the bipolar air ionizer efficacy against particulate pollutants and byproduct ozone emission has not been fully understood and remained a critical co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Nishant, Agarwal, Ashok Kumar, Singhal, Rajeev, Jindal, Sanjay Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Nature Singapore 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10249570/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41810-023-00182-9
_version_ 1785055588360650752
author Gupta, Nishant
Agarwal, Ashok Kumar
Singhal, Rajeev
Jindal, Sanjay Kumar
author_facet Gupta, Nishant
Agarwal, Ashok Kumar
Singhal, Rajeev
Jindal, Sanjay Kumar
author_sort Gupta, Nishant
collection PubMed
description Indoor air cleaning interventions such as bipolar air ionizers have increased lately due to rampant air pollution and the COVID-19 pandemic. Hitherto, the bipolar air ionizer efficacy against particulate pollutants and byproduct ozone emission has not been fully understood and remained a critical concern. Currently, available diverse and complex methods are insufficient to determine commercially available bipolar air ionizer reliability. The National and International market of bipolar air ionizers is proliferating, while safety standards and information are comparatively limited, in such cases, any misleading information by manufacturers could be detrimental to consumers. To focus on those gaps, the present study comprised five different types of commercially available bipolar air ionizers labeled as BAI 1, BAI2, BAI3, BAI4, and BAI5, which were examined against the most concerned indoor particulate pollutants and potential byproduct ozone. Seven days of consecutive experiments were performed in five acrylic boxes, each box assembled with a testing bipolar ionizer model, calibrated air quality monitor, and particulate pollutant source (incense sticks). Two runs/day for each individual bipolar ionizer were performed for up to seven consecutive days. Overall performance was procured from the daily cumulative arithmetic average. All tested bipolar air ionizers models showed notable, up to 80% particulate matter (PM(2.5) and PM(10)) removal efficiencies. The highest particulate matter removal was associated with bipolar air ionizers model 4 (PM(10) 79.7%, PM(2.5) 80.4%) and the minimum with BAI model 5 (PM(10) 72.2%, PM(2.5) 72.3%). Abnormal ozone emission was not observed with any bipolar air ionizer conduction in this study. Almost negligible elevation in background temperature (0.4 °C) and relative humidity (0.6%) were also observed. In conclusion, bipolar air ionizers could be byproduct ozone-free, indoor particulate matter removal, and low maintenance indoor air cleaning option.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10249570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Nature Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102495702023-06-12 A Comparative Assessment of the Some Commercially Available Portable Bipolar Air Ionizers Particulate Pollutants (PM(2.5), PM(10)) Removal Efficacies and Potential Byproduct Ozone Emission Gupta, Nishant Agarwal, Ashok Kumar Singhal, Rajeev Jindal, Sanjay Kumar Aerosol Sci Eng Original Paper Indoor air cleaning interventions such as bipolar air ionizers have increased lately due to rampant air pollution and the COVID-19 pandemic. Hitherto, the bipolar air ionizer efficacy against particulate pollutants and byproduct ozone emission has not been fully understood and remained a critical concern. Currently, available diverse and complex methods are insufficient to determine commercially available bipolar air ionizer reliability. The National and International market of bipolar air ionizers is proliferating, while safety standards and information are comparatively limited, in such cases, any misleading information by manufacturers could be detrimental to consumers. To focus on those gaps, the present study comprised five different types of commercially available bipolar air ionizers labeled as BAI 1, BAI2, BAI3, BAI4, and BAI5, which were examined against the most concerned indoor particulate pollutants and potential byproduct ozone. Seven days of consecutive experiments were performed in five acrylic boxes, each box assembled with a testing bipolar ionizer model, calibrated air quality monitor, and particulate pollutant source (incense sticks). Two runs/day for each individual bipolar ionizer were performed for up to seven consecutive days. Overall performance was procured from the daily cumulative arithmetic average. All tested bipolar air ionizers models showed notable, up to 80% particulate matter (PM(2.5) and PM(10)) removal efficiencies. The highest particulate matter removal was associated with bipolar air ionizers model 4 (PM(10) 79.7%, PM(2.5) 80.4%) and the minimum with BAI model 5 (PM(10) 72.2%, PM(2.5) 72.3%). Abnormal ozone emission was not observed with any bipolar air ionizer conduction in this study. Almost negligible elevation in background temperature (0.4 °C) and relative humidity (0.6%) were also observed. In conclusion, bipolar air ionizers could be byproduct ozone-free, indoor particulate matter removal, and low maintenance indoor air cleaning option. Springer Nature Singapore 2023-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10249570/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41810-023-00182-9 Text en © The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy Sciences 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Gupta, Nishant
Agarwal, Ashok Kumar
Singhal, Rajeev
Jindal, Sanjay Kumar
A Comparative Assessment of the Some Commercially Available Portable Bipolar Air Ionizers Particulate Pollutants (PM(2.5), PM(10)) Removal Efficacies and Potential Byproduct Ozone Emission
title A Comparative Assessment of the Some Commercially Available Portable Bipolar Air Ionizers Particulate Pollutants (PM(2.5), PM(10)) Removal Efficacies and Potential Byproduct Ozone Emission
title_full A Comparative Assessment of the Some Commercially Available Portable Bipolar Air Ionizers Particulate Pollutants (PM(2.5), PM(10)) Removal Efficacies and Potential Byproduct Ozone Emission
title_fullStr A Comparative Assessment of the Some Commercially Available Portable Bipolar Air Ionizers Particulate Pollutants (PM(2.5), PM(10)) Removal Efficacies and Potential Byproduct Ozone Emission
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Assessment of the Some Commercially Available Portable Bipolar Air Ionizers Particulate Pollutants (PM(2.5), PM(10)) Removal Efficacies and Potential Byproduct Ozone Emission
title_short A Comparative Assessment of the Some Commercially Available Portable Bipolar Air Ionizers Particulate Pollutants (PM(2.5), PM(10)) Removal Efficacies and Potential Byproduct Ozone Emission
title_sort comparative assessment of the some commercially available portable bipolar air ionizers particulate pollutants (pm(2.5), pm(10)) removal efficacies and potential byproduct ozone emission
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10249570/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41810-023-00182-9
work_keys_str_mv AT guptanishant acomparativeassessmentofthesomecommerciallyavailableportablebipolarairionizersparticulatepollutantspm25pm10removalefficaciesandpotentialbyproductozoneemission
AT agarwalashokkumar acomparativeassessmentofthesomecommerciallyavailableportablebipolarairionizersparticulatepollutantspm25pm10removalefficaciesandpotentialbyproductozoneemission
AT singhalrajeev acomparativeassessmentofthesomecommerciallyavailableportablebipolarairionizersparticulatepollutantspm25pm10removalefficaciesandpotentialbyproductozoneemission
AT jindalsanjaykumar acomparativeassessmentofthesomecommerciallyavailableportablebipolarairionizersparticulatepollutantspm25pm10removalefficaciesandpotentialbyproductozoneemission
AT guptanishant comparativeassessmentofthesomecommerciallyavailableportablebipolarairionizersparticulatepollutantspm25pm10removalefficaciesandpotentialbyproductozoneemission
AT agarwalashokkumar comparativeassessmentofthesomecommerciallyavailableportablebipolarairionizersparticulatepollutantspm25pm10removalefficaciesandpotentialbyproductozoneemission
AT singhalrajeev comparativeassessmentofthesomecommerciallyavailableportablebipolarairionizersparticulatepollutantspm25pm10removalefficaciesandpotentialbyproductozoneemission
AT jindalsanjaykumar comparativeassessmentofthesomecommerciallyavailableportablebipolarairionizersparticulatepollutantspm25pm10removalefficaciesandpotentialbyproductozoneemission