Cargando…
Bone impact after two years of low-dose oral contraceptive use during adolescence
OBJECTIVE: Data regarding the use and effect of hormonal contraceptives on bone mass acquisition during adolescence are contradictory. The present study was designed to evaluate bone metabolism in two groups of healthy adolescents using combined oral contraceptives (COC). METHODS: A total of 168 ado...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10249826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37289781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285885 |
_version_ | 1785055626444931072 |
---|---|
author | Orsolini, Lilian Rodrigues Goldberg, Tamara Beres Lederer Caldeirão, Talita Domingues Cristiane da Silva, Carla Rizzo, Anapaula da Conceição Bisi Biason, Talita Poli Teixeira, Altamir Santos Carvalho Nunes, Helio Rubens |
author_facet | Orsolini, Lilian Rodrigues Goldberg, Tamara Beres Lederer Caldeirão, Talita Domingues Cristiane da Silva, Carla Rizzo, Anapaula da Conceição Bisi Biason, Talita Poli Teixeira, Altamir Santos Carvalho Nunes, Helio Rubens |
author_sort | Orsolini, Lilian Rodrigues |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Data regarding the use and effect of hormonal contraceptives on bone mass acquisition during adolescence are contradictory. The present study was designed to evaluate bone metabolism in two groups of healthy adolescents using combined oral contraceptives (COC). METHODS: A total of 168 adolescents were recruited from 2014 to 2020 in a non-randomized clinical trial and divided into three groups. The COC1 group used 20 μg Ethinylestradiol (EE)/150 μg Desogestrel and the COC2 group used 30 μg EE/3 mg Drospirenone over a period of two years. These groups were compared to a control group of adolescent non-COC users. The adolescents were submitted to bone densitometry by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and measurement of bone biomarkers, bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), and osteocalcin (OC) at baseline and 24 months after inclusion in the study. The three groups studied were compared at the different time points by ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. RESULTS: Incorporation of bone mass was greater in non-users at all sites analyzed (4.85 g in lumbar Bone mineral content (BMC)) when compared to adolescents of the COC1 and COC2 groups, with a respective increase of 2.15 g and loss of 0.43g in lumbar BMC (P = 0.001). When comparing subtotal BMC, the control increased 100.83 g, COC 1 increased 21.46 g, and COC 2 presented a reduction of 1.47 g (P = 0.005). The values of bone markers after 24 months are similar for BAP, being 30.51 U/L (± 11.6) for the control group, 34.95 U/L (± 10.8) for COC1, and 30.29 U/L for COC 2 (± 11.5) (P = 0.377). However, when we analyzed OC, we observed for control, COC 1, and COC 2 groups, respectively, 13.59 ng/mL (± 7.3), 6.44 ng/mL (± 4.6), and 9.48 ng/mL (± 5.9), with P = 0.003. Despite loss to follow-up occurring in the three groups, there were no significant differences between the variables in adolescents at baseline who remained in the study during the 24-month follow-up and those who were excluded or lost to follow-up. CONCLUSION: Bone mass acquisition was compromised in healthy adolescents using combined hormonal contraceptives when compared to controls. This negative impact seems to be more pronounced in the group that used contraceptives containing 30 μg EE. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br, RBR-5h9b3c. “Low-dose combined oral contraceptive use is associated with lower bone mass in adolescents”. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10249826 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102498262023-06-09 Bone impact after two years of low-dose oral contraceptive use during adolescence Orsolini, Lilian Rodrigues Goldberg, Tamara Beres Lederer Caldeirão, Talita Domingues Cristiane da Silva, Carla Rizzo, Anapaula da Conceição Bisi Biason, Talita Poli Teixeira, Altamir Santos Carvalho Nunes, Helio Rubens PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Data regarding the use and effect of hormonal contraceptives on bone mass acquisition during adolescence are contradictory. The present study was designed to evaluate bone metabolism in two groups of healthy adolescents using combined oral contraceptives (COC). METHODS: A total of 168 adolescents were recruited from 2014 to 2020 in a non-randomized clinical trial and divided into three groups. The COC1 group used 20 μg Ethinylestradiol (EE)/150 μg Desogestrel and the COC2 group used 30 μg EE/3 mg Drospirenone over a period of two years. These groups were compared to a control group of adolescent non-COC users. The adolescents were submitted to bone densitometry by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and measurement of bone biomarkers, bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), and osteocalcin (OC) at baseline and 24 months after inclusion in the study. The three groups studied were compared at the different time points by ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. RESULTS: Incorporation of bone mass was greater in non-users at all sites analyzed (4.85 g in lumbar Bone mineral content (BMC)) when compared to adolescents of the COC1 and COC2 groups, with a respective increase of 2.15 g and loss of 0.43g in lumbar BMC (P = 0.001). When comparing subtotal BMC, the control increased 100.83 g, COC 1 increased 21.46 g, and COC 2 presented a reduction of 1.47 g (P = 0.005). The values of bone markers after 24 months are similar for BAP, being 30.51 U/L (± 11.6) for the control group, 34.95 U/L (± 10.8) for COC1, and 30.29 U/L for COC 2 (± 11.5) (P = 0.377). However, when we analyzed OC, we observed for control, COC 1, and COC 2 groups, respectively, 13.59 ng/mL (± 7.3), 6.44 ng/mL (± 4.6), and 9.48 ng/mL (± 5.9), with P = 0.003. Despite loss to follow-up occurring in the three groups, there were no significant differences between the variables in adolescents at baseline who remained in the study during the 24-month follow-up and those who were excluded or lost to follow-up. CONCLUSION: Bone mass acquisition was compromised in healthy adolescents using combined hormonal contraceptives when compared to controls. This negative impact seems to be more pronounced in the group that used contraceptives containing 30 μg EE. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br, RBR-5h9b3c. “Low-dose combined oral contraceptive use is associated with lower bone mass in adolescents”. Public Library of Science 2023-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10249826/ /pubmed/37289781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285885 Text en © 2023 Orsolini et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Orsolini, Lilian Rodrigues Goldberg, Tamara Beres Lederer Caldeirão, Talita Domingues Cristiane da Silva, Carla Rizzo, Anapaula da Conceição Bisi Biason, Talita Poli Teixeira, Altamir Santos Carvalho Nunes, Helio Rubens Bone impact after two years of low-dose oral contraceptive use during adolescence |
title | Bone impact after two years of low-dose oral contraceptive use during adolescence |
title_full | Bone impact after two years of low-dose oral contraceptive use during adolescence |
title_fullStr | Bone impact after two years of low-dose oral contraceptive use during adolescence |
title_full_unstemmed | Bone impact after two years of low-dose oral contraceptive use during adolescence |
title_short | Bone impact after two years of low-dose oral contraceptive use during adolescence |
title_sort | bone impact after two years of low-dose oral contraceptive use during adolescence |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10249826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37289781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285885 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT orsolinililianrodrigues boneimpactaftertwoyearsoflowdoseoralcontraceptiveuseduringadolescence AT goldbergtamarabereslederer boneimpactaftertwoyearsoflowdoseoralcontraceptiveuseduringadolescence AT caldeiraotalitadomingues boneimpactaftertwoyearsoflowdoseoralcontraceptiveuseduringadolescence AT cristianedasilvacarla boneimpactaftertwoyearsoflowdoseoralcontraceptiveuseduringadolescence AT rizzoanapauladaconceicaobisi boneimpactaftertwoyearsoflowdoseoralcontraceptiveuseduringadolescence AT biasontalitapoli boneimpactaftertwoyearsoflowdoseoralcontraceptiveuseduringadolescence AT teixeiraaltamirsantos boneimpactaftertwoyearsoflowdoseoralcontraceptiveuseduringadolescence AT carvalhonunesheliorubens boneimpactaftertwoyearsoflowdoseoralcontraceptiveuseduringadolescence |