Cargando…

Developing quality indicators for cross-sectoral psycho-oncology in Germany: combining the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method with a Delphi technique

BACKGROUND: Internationally, the need for appropriately structured, high-quality care in psycho-oncology is more and more recognized and quality-oriented care is to be established. Quality indicators are becoming increasingly important for a systematic development and improvement of the quality of c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Derendorf, Lisa, Stock, Stephanie, Simic, Dusan, Lemmen, Clarissa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10249931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37291536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09604-3
_version_ 1785055651108487168
author Derendorf, Lisa
Stock, Stephanie
Simic, Dusan
Lemmen, Clarissa
author_facet Derendorf, Lisa
Stock, Stephanie
Simic, Dusan
Lemmen, Clarissa
author_sort Derendorf, Lisa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Internationally, the need for appropriately structured, high-quality care in psycho-oncology is more and more recognized and quality-oriented care is to be established. Quality indicators are becoming increasingly important for a systematic development and improvement of the quality of care. The aim of this study was to develop a set of quality indicators for a new form of care, a cross-sectoral psycho-oncological care program in the German health care system. METHODS: The widely established RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was combined with a modified Delphi technique. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify existing indicators. All identified indicators were evaluated and rated in a two-round Delphi process. Expert panels embedded in the Delphi process assessed the indicators in terms of relevance, data availability and feasibility. An indicator was accepted by consensus if at least 75% of the ratings corresponded to category 4 or 5 on a five-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Of the 88 potential indicators derived from a systematic literature review and other sources, 29 were deemed relevant in the first Delphi round. After the first expert panel, 28 of the dissented indicators were re-rated and added. Of these 57 indicators, 45 were found to be feasible in terms of data availability by the second round of expert panel. In total, 22 indicators were transferred into a quality report, implemented and tested within the care networks for participatory quality improvement. In the second Delphi round, the embedded indicators were tested for their practicability. The final set includes 16 indicators that were operationalized in care practice and rated by the expert panel as relevant, comprehensible, and suitable for care practice. CONCLUSION: The developed set of quality indicators has proven in practical testing to be a valid quality assurance tool for internal and external quality management. The study findings could contribute to traceable high quality in cross-sectoral psycho-oncology by providing a valid and comprehensive set of quality indicators. TRIAL REGISTRATION: “Entwicklung eines Qualitätsmanagementsystems in der integrierten, sektorenübergreifenden Psychoonkologie—AP “Qualitätsmanagement und Versorgungsmanagement” zur Studie "integrierte, sektorenübergreifende Psychoonkologie (isPO)" a sub-project of the “integrierte, sektorenübergreifende Psychoonkologie (isPO)”, was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) (DRKS-ID: DRKS00021515) on 3rd September 2020. The main project was registered on 30th October 2018 (DRKS-ID: DRKS00015326). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09604-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10249931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102499312023-06-10 Developing quality indicators for cross-sectoral psycho-oncology in Germany: combining the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method with a Delphi technique Derendorf, Lisa Stock, Stephanie Simic, Dusan Lemmen, Clarissa BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Internationally, the need for appropriately structured, high-quality care in psycho-oncology is more and more recognized and quality-oriented care is to be established. Quality indicators are becoming increasingly important for a systematic development and improvement of the quality of care. The aim of this study was to develop a set of quality indicators for a new form of care, a cross-sectoral psycho-oncological care program in the German health care system. METHODS: The widely established RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was combined with a modified Delphi technique. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify existing indicators. All identified indicators were evaluated and rated in a two-round Delphi process. Expert panels embedded in the Delphi process assessed the indicators in terms of relevance, data availability and feasibility. An indicator was accepted by consensus if at least 75% of the ratings corresponded to category 4 or 5 on a five-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Of the 88 potential indicators derived from a systematic literature review and other sources, 29 were deemed relevant in the first Delphi round. After the first expert panel, 28 of the dissented indicators were re-rated and added. Of these 57 indicators, 45 were found to be feasible in terms of data availability by the second round of expert panel. In total, 22 indicators were transferred into a quality report, implemented and tested within the care networks for participatory quality improvement. In the second Delphi round, the embedded indicators were tested for their practicability. The final set includes 16 indicators that were operationalized in care practice and rated by the expert panel as relevant, comprehensible, and suitable for care practice. CONCLUSION: The developed set of quality indicators has proven in practical testing to be a valid quality assurance tool for internal and external quality management. The study findings could contribute to traceable high quality in cross-sectoral psycho-oncology by providing a valid and comprehensive set of quality indicators. TRIAL REGISTRATION: “Entwicklung eines Qualitätsmanagementsystems in der integrierten, sektorenübergreifenden Psychoonkologie—AP “Qualitätsmanagement und Versorgungsmanagement” zur Studie "integrierte, sektorenübergreifende Psychoonkologie (isPO)" a sub-project of the “integrierte, sektorenübergreifende Psychoonkologie (isPO)”, was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) (DRKS-ID: DRKS00021515) on 3rd September 2020. The main project was registered on 30th October 2018 (DRKS-ID: DRKS00015326). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09604-3. BioMed Central 2023-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10249931/ /pubmed/37291536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09604-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Derendorf, Lisa
Stock, Stephanie
Simic, Dusan
Lemmen, Clarissa
Developing quality indicators for cross-sectoral psycho-oncology in Germany: combining the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method with a Delphi technique
title Developing quality indicators for cross-sectoral psycho-oncology in Germany: combining the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method with a Delphi technique
title_full Developing quality indicators for cross-sectoral psycho-oncology in Germany: combining the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method with a Delphi technique
title_fullStr Developing quality indicators for cross-sectoral psycho-oncology in Germany: combining the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method with a Delphi technique
title_full_unstemmed Developing quality indicators for cross-sectoral psycho-oncology in Germany: combining the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method with a Delphi technique
title_short Developing quality indicators for cross-sectoral psycho-oncology in Germany: combining the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method with a Delphi technique
title_sort developing quality indicators for cross-sectoral psycho-oncology in germany: combining the rand/ucla appropriateness method with a delphi technique
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10249931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37291536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09604-3
work_keys_str_mv AT derendorflisa developingqualityindicatorsforcrosssectoralpsychooncologyingermanycombiningtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodwithadelphitechnique
AT stockstephanie developingqualityindicatorsforcrosssectoralpsychooncologyingermanycombiningtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodwithadelphitechnique
AT simicdusan developingqualityindicatorsforcrosssectoralpsychooncologyingermanycombiningtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodwithadelphitechnique
AT lemmenclarissa developingqualityindicatorsforcrosssectoralpsychooncologyingermanycombiningtheranduclaappropriatenessmethodwithadelphitechnique