Cargando…

Cerebral hemodynamics comparison using transcranial doppler ultrasound and 4D flow MRI

Introduction: Age-related changes in cerebral hemodynamics are controversial and discrepancies may be due to experimental techniques. As such, the purpose of this study was to compare cerebral hemodynamics measurements of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) between transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fico, Brandon G., Miller, Kathleen B., Rivera-Rivera, Leonardo A., Corkery, Adam T., Pearson, Andrew G., Loggie, Nicole A., Howery, Anna J., Rowley, Howard A., Johnson, Kevin M., Johnson, Sterling C., Wieben, Oliver, Barnes, Jill N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10250020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37304825
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1198615
_version_ 1785055664223027200
author Fico, Brandon G.
Miller, Kathleen B.
Rivera-Rivera, Leonardo A.
Corkery, Adam T.
Pearson, Andrew G.
Loggie, Nicole A.
Howery, Anna J.
Rowley, Howard A.
Johnson, Kevin M.
Johnson, Sterling C.
Wieben, Oliver
Barnes, Jill N.
author_facet Fico, Brandon G.
Miller, Kathleen B.
Rivera-Rivera, Leonardo A.
Corkery, Adam T.
Pearson, Andrew G.
Loggie, Nicole A.
Howery, Anna J.
Rowley, Howard A.
Johnson, Kevin M.
Johnson, Sterling C.
Wieben, Oliver
Barnes, Jill N.
author_sort Fico, Brandon G.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Age-related changes in cerebral hemodynamics are controversial and discrepancies may be due to experimental techniques. As such, the purpose of this study was to compare cerebral hemodynamics measurements of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) between transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) and four-dimensional flow MRI (4D flow MRI). Methods: Twenty young (25 ± 3 years) and 19 older (62 ± 6 years) participants underwent two randomized study visits to evaluate hemodynamics at baseline (normocapnia) and in response to stepped hypercapnia (4% CO(2), and 6% CO(2)) using TCD and 4D flow MRI. Cerebral hemodynamic measures included MCA velocity, MCA flow, cerebral pulsatility index (PI) and cerebrovascular reactivity to hypercapnia. MCA flow was only assessed using 4D flow MRI. Results: MCA velocity between the TCD and 4D flow MRI methods was positively correlated across the normocapnia and hypercapnia conditions (r = 0.262; p = 0.004). Additionally, cerebral PI was significantly correlated between TCD and 4D flow MRI across the conditions (r = 0.236; p = 0.010). However, there was no significant association between MCA velocity using TCD and MCA flow using 4D flow MRI across the conditions (r = 0.079; p = 0.397). When age-associated differences in cerebrovascular reactivity using conductance were compared using both methodologies, cerebrovascular reactivity was greater in young adults compared to older adults when using 4D flow MRI (2.11 ± 1.68 mL/min/mmHg/mmHg vs. 0.78 ± 1.68 mL/min/mmHg/mmHg; p = 0.019), but not with TCD (0.88 ± 1.01 cm/s/mmHg/mmHg vs. 0.68 ± 0.94 cm/s/mmHg/mmHg; p = 0.513). Conclusion: Our results demonstrated good agreement between the methods at measuring MCA velocity during normocapnia and in response to hypercapnia, but MCA velocity and MCA flow were not related. In addition, measurements using 4D flow MRI revealed effects of aging on cerebral hemodynamics that were not apparent using TCD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10250020
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102500202023-06-09 Cerebral hemodynamics comparison using transcranial doppler ultrasound and 4D flow MRI Fico, Brandon G. Miller, Kathleen B. Rivera-Rivera, Leonardo A. Corkery, Adam T. Pearson, Andrew G. Loggie, Nicole A. Howery, Anna J. Rowley, Howard A. Johnson, Kevin M. Johnson, Sterling C. Wieben, Oliver Barnes, Jill N. Front Physiol Physiology Introduction: Age-related changes in cerebral hemodynamics are controversial and discrepancies may be due to experimental techniques. As such, the purpose of this study was to compare cerebral hemodynamics measurements of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) between transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) and four-dimensional flow MRI (4D flow MRI). Methods: Twenty young (25 ± 3 years) and 19 older (62 ± 6 years) participants underwent two randomized study visits to evaluate hemodynamics at baseline (normocapnia) and in response to stepped hypercapnia (4% CO(2), and 6% CO(2)) using TCD and 4D flow MRI. Cerebral hemodynamic measures included MCA velocity, MCA flow, cerebral pulsatility index (PI) and cerebrovascular reactivity to hypercapnia. MCA flow was only assessed using 4D flow MRI. Results: MCA velocity between the TCD and 4D flow MRI methods was positively correlated across the normocapnia and hypercapnia conditions (r = 0.262; p = 0.004). Additionally, cerebral PI was significantly correlated between TCD and 4D flow MRI across the conditions (r = 0.236; p = 0.010). However, there was no significant association between MCA velocity using TCD and MCA flow using 4D flow MRI across the conditions (r = 0.079; p = 0.397). When age-associated differences in cerebrovascular reactivity using conductance were compared using both methodologies, cerebrovascular reactivity was greater in young adults compared to older adults when using 4D flow MRI (2.11 ± 1.68 mL/min/mmHg/mmHg vs. 0.78 ± 1.68 mL/min/mmHg/mmHg; p = 0.019), but not with TCD (0.88 ± 1.01 cm/s/mmHg/mmHg vs. 0.68 ± 0.94 cm/s/mmHg/mmHg; p = 0.513). Conclusion: Our results demonstrated good agreement between the methods at measuring MCA velocity during normocapnia and in response to hypercapnia, but MCA velocity and MCA flow were not related. In addition, measurements using 4D flow MRI revealed effects of aging on cerebral hemodynamics that were not apparent using TCD. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10250020/ /pubmed/37304825 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1198615 Text en Copyright © 2023 Fico, Miller, Rivera-Rivera, Corkery, Pearson, Loggie, Howery, Rowley, Johnson, Johnson, Wieben and Barnes. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Fico, Brandon G.
Miller, Kathleen B.
Rivera-Rivera, Leonardo A.
Corkery, Adam T.
Pearson, Andrew G.
Loggie, Nicole A.
Howery, Anna J.
Rowley, Howard A.
Johnson, Kevin M.
Johnson, Sterling C.
Wieben, Oliver
Barnes, Jill N.
Cerebral hemodynamics comparison using transcranial doppler ultrasound and 4D flow MRI
title Cerebral hemodynamics comparison using transcranial doppler ultrasound and 4D flow MRI
title_full Cerebral hemodynamics comparison using transcranial doppler ultrasound and 4D flow MRI
title_fullStr Cerebral hemodynamics comparison using transcranial doppler ultrasound and 4D flow MRI
title_full_unstemmed Cerebral hemodynamics comparison using transcranial doppler ultrasound and 4D flow MRI
title_short Cerebral hemodynamics comparison using transcranial doppler ultrasound and 4D flow MRI
title_sort cerebral hemodynamics comparison using transcranial doppler ultrasound and 4d flow mri
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10250020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37304825
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1198615
work_keys_str_mv AT ficobrandong cerebralhemodynamicscomparisonusingtranscranialdopplerultrasoundand4dflowmri
AT millerkathleenb cerebralhemodynamicscomparisonusingtranscranialdopplerultrasoundand4dflowmri
AT riverariveraleonardoa cerebralhemodynamicscomparisonusingtranscranialdopplerultrasoundand4dflowmri
AT corkeryadamt cerebralhemodynamicscomparisonusingtranscranialdopplerultrasoundand4dflowmri
AT pearsonandrewg cerebralhemodynamicscomparisonusingtranscranialdopplerultrasoundand4dflowmri
AT loggienicolea cerebralhemodynamicscomparisonusingtranscranialdopplerultrasoundand4dflowmri
AT howeryannaj cerebralhemodynamicscomparisonusingtranscranialdopplerultrasoundand4dflowmri
AT rowleyhowarda cerebralhemodynamicscomparisonusingtranscranialdopplerultrasoundand4dflowmri
AT johnsonkevinm cerebralhemodynamicscomparisonusingtranscranialdopplerultrasoundand4dflowmri
AT johnsonsterlingc cerebralhemodynamicscomparisonusingtranscranialdopplerultrasoundand4dflowmri
AT wiebenoliver cerebralhemodynamicscomparisonusingtranscranialdopplerultrasoundand4dflowmri
AT barnesjilln cerebralhemodynamicscomparisonusingtranscranialdopplerultrasoundand4dflowmri