Cargando…

Investigating discrimination in the workplace. Translation and validation of the Everyday Discrimination Scale for nursing staff in Germany

BACKGROUND: The Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS) is a frequently used questionnaire in the field of health and social psychology that aims to explore perceptions of discrimination, especially instances of injustice related to various diversity characteristics. No adaptation to health care staff e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ulusoy, Nazan, Nienhaus, Albert, Brzoska, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10250171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37291521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01367-w
_version_ 1785055697641144320
author Ulusoy, Nazan
Nienhaus, Albert
Brzoska, Patrick
author_facet Ulusoy, Nazan
Nienhaus, Albert
Brzoska, Patrick
author_sort Ulusoy, Nazan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS) is a frequently used questionnaire in the field of health and social psychology that aims to explore perceptions of discrimination, especially instances of injustice related to various diversity characteristics. No adaptation to health care staff exists. The present study translates and adapts the EDS to nursing staff in Germany and examines its reliability and factorial validity as well as its measurement equivalence between men and women and different age groups. METHODS: The study was based on an online survey conducted among health care staff of two hospitals and two inpatient care facilities in Germany. The EDS was translated using a forward-backward translation approach. Direct maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to examine the factorial validity of the adapted EDS. Differential item functioning (DIF) related to age and sex was investigated by means of multiple indicators, multiple causes (MIMIC) models. RESULTS: Data on 302 individuals was available, of whom 237 (78.5%) were women. The most commonly employed one-factor, 8-item baseline model of the adapted EDS showed a poor fit (RMSEA = 0.149; CFI = 0.812; TLI = 0.737; SRMR = 0.072). The model fit improved considerably after including three error covariances between items 1 and 2, items 4 and 5, and items 7 and 8 (RMSEA = 0.066; CFI = 0.969; TLI = 0.949; SRMR = 0.036). Item 4 showed DIF related to sex and age, item 6 showed DIF related to age. DIF was moderate in size and did not bias the comparison between men and women or between younger and older employees. CONCLUSIONS: The EDS can be considered a valid instrument for the assessment of discrimination experiences among nursing staff. Given that the questionnaire, similar to other EDS adaptations, may be prone to DIF and also considering that some error covariances need to be parameterized, latent variable modelling should be used for the analysis of the questionnaire.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10250171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102501712023-06-10 Investigating discrimination in the workplace. Translation and validation of the Everyday Discrimination Scale for nursing staff in Germany Ulusoy, Nazan Nienhaus, Albert Brzoska, Patrick BMC Nurs Research BACKGROUND: The Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS) is a frequently used questionnaire in the field of health and social psychology that aims to explore perceptions of discrimination, especially instances of injustice related to various diversity characteristics. No adaptation to health care staff exists. The present study translates and adapts the EDS to nursing staff in Germany and examines its reliability and factorial validity as well as its measurement equivalence between men and women and different age groups. METHODS: The study was based on an online survey conducted among health care staff of two hospitals and two inpatient care facilities in Germany. The EDS was translated using a forward-backward translation approach. Direct maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to examine the factorial validity of the adapted EDS. Differential item functioning (DIF) related to age and sex was investigated by means of multiple indicators, multiple causes (MIMIC) models. RESULTS: Data on 302 individuals was available, of whom 237 (78.5%) were women. The most commonly employed one-factor, 8-item baseline model of the adapted EDS showed a poor fit (RMSEA = 0.149; CFI = 0.812; TLI = 0.737; SRMR = 0.072). The model fit improved considerably after including three error covariances between items 1 and 2, items 4 and 5, and items 7 and 8 (RMSEA = 0.066; CFI = 0.969; TLI = 0.949; SRMR = 0.036). Item 4 showed DIF related to sex and age, item 6 showed DIF related to age. DIF was moderate in size and did not bias the comparison between men and women or between younger and older employees. CONCLUSIONS: The EDS can be considered a valid instrument for the assessment of discrimination experiences among nursing staff. Given that the questionnaire, similar to other EDS adaptations, may be prone to DIF and also considering that some error covariances need to be parameterized, latent variable modelling should be used for the analysis of the questionnaire. BioMed Central 2023-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10250171/ /pubmed/37291521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01367-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ulusoy, Nazan
Nienhaus, Albert
Brzoska, Patrick
Investigating discrimination in the workplace. Translation and validation of the Everyday Discrimination Scale for nursing staff in Germany
title Investigating discrimination in the workplace. Translation and validation of the Everyday Discrimination Scale for nursing staff in Germany
title_full Investigating discrimination in the workplace. Translation and validation of the Everyday Discrimination Scale for nursing staff in Germany
title_fullStr Investigating discrimination in the workplace. Translation and validation of the Everyday Discrimination Scale for nursing staff in Germany
title_full_unstemmed Investigating discrimination in the workplace. Translation and validation of the Everyday Discrimination Scale for nursing staff in Germany
title_short Investigating discrimination in the workplace. Translation and validation of the Everyday Discrimination Scale for nursing staff in Germany
title_sort investigating discrimination in the workplace. translation and validation of the everyday discrimination scale for nursing staff in germany
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10250171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37291521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01367-w
work_keys_str_mv AT ulusoynazan investigatingdiscriminationintheworkplacetranslationandvalidationoftheeverydaydiscriminationscalefornursingstaffingermany
AT nienhausalbert investigatingdiscriminationintheworkplacetranslationandvalidationoftheeverydaydiscriminationscalefornursingstaffingermany
AT brzoskapatrick investigatingdiscriminationintheworkplacetranslationandvalidationoftheeverydaydiscriminationscalefornursingstaffingermany