Cargando…
Coronary X-ray angiography segmentation using Artificial Intelligence: a multicentric validation study of a deep learning model
INTRODUCTION: We previously developed an artificial intelligence (AI) model for automatic coronary angiography (CAG) segmentation, using deep learning. To validate this approach, the model was applied to a new dataset and results are reported. METHODS: Retrospective selection of patients undergoing...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10250252/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37027105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-02839-5 |
_version_ | 1785055716743053312 |
---|---|
author | Nobre Menezes, Miguel Silva, João Lourenço Silva, Beatriz Rodrigues, Tiago Guerreiro, Cláudio Guedes, João Pedro Santos, Manuel Oliveira Oliveira, Arlindo L. Pinto, Fausto J. |
author_facet | Nobre Menezes, Miguel Silva, João Lourenço Silva, Beatriz Rodrigues, Tiago Guerreiro, Cláudio Guedes, João Pedro Santos, Manuel Oliveira Oliveira, Arlindo L. Pinto, Fausto J. |
author_sort | Nobre Menezes, Miguel |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: We previously developed an artificial intelligence (AI) model for automatic coronary angiography (CAG) segmentation, using deep learning. To validate this approach, the model was applied to a new dataset and results are reported. METHODS: Retrospective selection of patients undergoing CAG and percutaneous coronary intervention or invasive physiology assessment over a one month period from four centers. A single frame was selected from images containing a lesion with a 50–99% stenosis (visual estimation). Automatic Quantitative Coronary Analysis (QCA) was performed with a validated software. Images were then segmented by the AI model. Lesion diameters, area overlap [based on true positive (TP) and true negative (TN) pixels] and a global segmentation score (GSS – 0 -100 points) - previously developed and published - were measured. RESULTS: 123 regions of interest from 117 images across 90 patients were included. There were no significant differences between lesion diameter, percentage diameter stenosis and distal border diameter between the original/segmented images. There was a statistically significant albeit minor difference [0,19 mm (0,09–0,28)] regarding proximal border diameter. Overlap accuracy ((TP + TN)/(TP + TN + FP + FN)), sensitivity (TP / (TP + FN)) and Dice Score (2TP / (2TP + FN + FP)) between original/segmented images was 99,9%, 95,1% and 94,8%, respectively. The GSS was 92 (87–96), similar to the previously obtained value in the training dataset. CONCLUSION: the AI model was capable of accurate CAG segmentation across multiple performance metrics, when applied to a multicentric validation dataset. This paves the way for future research on its clinical uses. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10554-023-02839-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10250252 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102502522023-06-10 Coronary X-ray angiography segmentation using Artificial Intelligence: a multicentric validation study of a deep learning model Nobre Menezes, Miguel Silva, João Lourenço Silva, Beatriz Rodrigues, Tiago Guerreiro, Cláudio Guedes, João Pedro Santos, Manuel Oliveira Oliveira, Arlindo L. Pinto, Fausto J. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Paper INTRODUCTION: We previously developed an artificial intelligence (AI) model for automatic coronary angiography (CAG) segmentation, using deep learning. To validate this approach, the model was applied to a new dataset and results are reported. METHODS: Retrospective selection of patients undergoing CAG and percutaneous coronary intervention or invasive physiology assessment over a one month period from four centers. A single frame was selected from images containing a lesion with a 50–99% stenosis (visual estimation). Automatic Quantitative Coronary Analysis (QCA) was performed with a validated software. Images were then segmented by the AI model. Lesion diameters, area overlap [based on true positive (TP) and true negative (TN) pixels] and a global segmentation score (GSS – 0 -100 points) - previously developed and published - were measured. RESULTS: 123 regions of interest from 117 images across 90 patients were included. There were no significant differences between lesion diameter, percentage diameter stenosis and distal border diameter between the original/segmented images. There was a statistically significant albeit minor difference [0,19 mm (0,09–0,28)] regarding proximal border diameter. Overlap accuracy ((TP + TN)/(TP + TN + FP + FN)), sensitivity (TP / (TP + FN)) and Dice Score (2TP / (2TP + FN + FP)) between original/segmented images was 99,9%, 95,1% and 94,8%, respectively. The GSS was 92 (87–96), similar to the previously obtained value in the training dataset. CONCLUSION: the AI model was capable of accurate CAG segmentation across multiple performance metrics, when applied to a multicentric validation dataset. This paves the way for future research on its clinical uses. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10554-023-02839-5. Springer Netherlands 2023-04-07 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10250252/ /pubmed/37027105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-02839-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Nobre Menezes, Miguel Silva, João Lourenço Silva, Beatriz Rodrigues, Tiago Guerreiro, Cláudio Guedes, João Pedro Santos, Manuel Oliveira Oliveira, Arlindo L. Pinto, Fausto J. Coronary X-ray angiography segmentation using Artificial Intelligence: a multicentric validation study of a deep learning model |
title | Coronary X-ray angiography segmentation using Artificial Intelligence: a multicentric validation study of a deep learning model |
title_full | Coronary X-ray angiography segmentation using Artificial Intelligence: a multicentric validation study of a deep learning model |
title_fullStr | Coronary X-ray angiography segmentation using Artificial Intelligence: a multicentric validation study of a deep learning model |
title_full_unstemmed | Coronary X-ray angiography segmentation using Artificial Intelligence: a multicentric validation study of a deep learning model |
title_short | Coronary X-ray angiography segmentation using Artificial Intelligence: a multicentric validation study of a deep learning model |
title_sort | coronary x-ray angiography segmentation using artificial intelligence: a multicentric validation study of a deep learning model |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10250252/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37027105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-02839-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nobremenezesmiguel coronaryxrayangiographysegmentationusingartificialintelligenceamulticentricvalidationstudyofadeeplearningmodel AT silvajoaolourenco coronaryxrayangiographysegmentationusingartificialintelligenceamulticentricvalidationstudyofadeeplearningmodel AT silvabeatriz coronaryxrayangiographysegmentationusingartificialintelligenceamulticentricvalidationstudyofadeeplearningmodel AT rodriguestiago coronaryxrayangiographysegmentationusingartificialintelligenceamulticentricvalidationstudyofadeeplearningmodel AT guerreiroclaudio coronaryxrayangiographysegmentationusingartificialintelligenceamulticentricvalidationstudyofadeeplearningmodel AT guedesjoaopedro coronaryxrayangiographysegmentationusingartificialintelligenceamulticentricvalidationstudyofadeeplearningmodel AT santosmanueloliveira coronaryxrayangiographysegmentationusingartificialintelligenceamulticentricvalidationstudyofadeeplearningmodel AT oliveiraarlindol coronaryxrayangiographysegmentationusingartificialintelligenceamulticentricvalidationstudyofadeeplearningmodel AT pintofaustoj coronaryxrayangiographysegmentationusingartificialintelligenceamulticentricvalidationstudyofadeeplearningmodel |