Cargando…

A computational process-tracing method for measuring people’s planning strategies and how they change over time

One of the most unique and impressive feats of the human mind is its ability to discover and continuously refine its own cognitive strategies. Elucidating the underlying learning and adaptation mechanisms is very difficult because changes in cognitive strategies are not directly observable. One impo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jain, Yash Raj, Callaway, Frederick, Griffiths, Thomas L., Dayan, Peter, He, Ruiqi, Krueger, Paul M., Lieder, Falk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10250277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35819717
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01789-5
_version_ 1785055722253320192
author Jain, Yash Raj
Callaway, Frederick
Griffiths, Thomas L.
Dayan, Peter
He, Ruiqi
Krueger, Paul M.
Lieder, Falk
author_facet Jain, Yash Raj
Callaway, Frederick
Griffiths, Thomas L.
Dayan, Peter
He, Ruiqi
Krueger, Paul M.
Lieder, Falk
author_sort Jain, Yash Raj
collection PubMed
description One of the most unique and impressive feats of the human mind is its ability to discover and continuously refine its own cognitive strategies. Elucidating the underlying learning and adaptation mechanisms is very difficult because changes in cognitive strategies are not directly observable. One important domain in which strategies and mechanisms are studied is planning. To enable researchers to uncover how people learn how to plan, we offer a tutorial introduction to a recently developed process-tracing paradigm along with a new computational method for measuring the nature and development of a person’s planning strategies from the resulting process-tracing data. Our method allows researchers to reveal experience-driven changes in people’s choice of individual planning operations, planning strategies, strategy types, and the relative contributions of different decision systems. We validate our method on simulated and empirical data. On simulated data, its inferences about the strategies and the relative influence of different decision systems are accurate. When evaluated on human data generated using our process-tracing paradigm, our computational method correctly detects the plasticity-enhancing effect of feedback and the effect of the structure of the environment on people’s planning strategies. Together, these methods can be used to investigate the mechanisms of cognitive plasticity and to elucidate how people acquire complex cognitive skills such as planning and problem-solving. Importantly, our methods can also be used to measure individual differences in cognitive plasticity and examine how different types (pedagogical) interventions affect the acquisition of cognitive skills.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10250277
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102502772023-06-10 A computational process-tracing method for measuring people’s planning strategies and how they change over time Jain, Yash Raj Callaway, Frederick Griffiths, Thomas L. Dayan, Peter He, Ruiqi Krueger, Paul M. Lieder, Falk Behav Res Methods Article One of the most unique and impressive feats of the human mind is its ability to discover and continuously refine its own cognitive strategies. Elucidating the underlying learning and adaptation mechanisms is very difficult because changes in cognitive strategies are not directly observable. One important domain in which strategies and mechanisms are studied is planning. To enable researchers to uncover how people learn how to plan, we offer a tutorial introduction to a recently developed process-tracing paradigm along with a new computational method for measuring the nature and development of a person’s planning strategies from the resulting process-tracing data. Our method allows researchers to reveal experience-driven changes in people’s choice of individual planning operations, planning strategies, strategy types, and the relative contributions of different decision systems. We validate our method on simulated and empirical data. On simulated data, its inferences about the strategies and the relative influence of different decision systems are accurate. When evaluated on human data generated using our process-tracing paradigm, our computational method correctly detects the plasticity-enhancing effect of feedback and the effect of the structure of the environment on people’s planning strategies. Together, these methods can be used to investigate the mechanisms of cognitive plasticity and to elucidate how people acquire complex cognitive skills such as planning and problem-solving. Importantly, our methods can also be used to measure individual differences in cognitive plasticity and examine how different types (pedagogical) interventions affect the acquisition of cognitive skills. Springer US 2022-07-11 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10250277/ /pubmed/35819717 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01789-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Jain, Yash Raj
Callaway, Frederick
Griffiths, Thomas L.
Dayan, Peter
He, Ruiqi
Krueger, Paul M.
Lieder, Falk
A computational process-tracing method for measuring people’s planning strategies and how they change over time
title A computational process-tracing method for measuring people’s planning strategies and how they change over time
title_full A computational process-tracing method for measuring people’s planning strategies and how they change over time
title_fullStr A computational process-tracing method for measuring people’s planning strategies and how they change over time
title_full_unstemmed A computational process-tracing method for measuring people’s planning strategies and how they change over time
title_short A computational process-tracing method for measuring people’s planning strategies and how they change over time
title_sort computational process-tracing method for measuring people’s planning strategies and how they change over time
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10250277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35819717
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01789-5
work_keys_str_mv AT jainyashraj acomputationalprocesstracingmethodformeasuringpeoplesplanningstrategiesandhowtheychangeovertime
AT callawayfrederick acomputationalprocesstracingmethodformeasuringpeoplesplanningstrategiesandhowtheychangeovertime
AT griffithsthomasl acomputationalprocesstracingmethodformeasuringpeoplesplanningstrategiesandhowtheychangeovertime
AT dayanpeter acomputationalprocesstracingmethodformeasuringpeoplesplanningstrategiesandhowtheychangeovertime
AT heruiqi acomputationalprocesstracingmethodformeasuringpeoplesplanningstrategiesandhowtheychangeovertime
AT kruegerpaulm acomputationalprocesstracingmethodformeasuringpeoplesplanningstrategiesandhowtheychangeovertime
AT liederfalk acomputationalprocesstracingmethodformeasuringpeoplesplanningstrategiesandhowtheychangeovertime
AT jainyashraj computationalprocesstracingmethodformeasuringpeoplesplanningstrategiesandhowtheychangeovertime
AT callawayfrederick computationalprocesstracingmethodformeasuringpeoplesplanningstrategiesandhowtheychangeovertime
AT griffithsthomasl computationalprocesstracingmethodformeasuringpeoplesplanningstrategiesandhowtheychangeovertime
AT dayanpeter computationalprocesstracingmethodformeasuringpeoplesplanningstrategiesandhowtheychangeovertime
AT heruiqi computationalprocesstracingmethodformeasuringpeoplesplanningstrategiesandhowtheychangeovertime
AT kruegerpaulm computationalprocesstracingmethodformeasuringpeoplesplanningstrategiesandhowtheychangeovertime
AT liederfalk computationalprocesstracingmethodformeasuringpeoplesplanningstrategiesandhowtheychangeovertime