Cargando…
A computational process-tracing method for measuring people’s planning strategies and how they change over time
One of the most unique and impressive feats of the human mind is its ability to discover and continuously refine its own cognitive strategies. Elucidating the underlying learning and adaptation mechanisms is very difficult because changes in cognitive strategies are not directly observable. One impo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10250277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35819717 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01789-5 |
_version_ | 1785055722253320192 |
---|---|
author | Jain, Yash Raj Callaway, Frederick Griffiths, Thomas L. Dayan, Peter He, Ruiqi Krueger, Paul M. Lieder, Falk |
author_facet | Jain, Yash Raj Callaway, Frederick Griffiths, Thomas L. Dayan, Peter He, Ruiqi Krueger, Paul M. Lieder, Falk |
author_sort | Jain, Yash Raj |
collection | PubMed |
description | One of the most unique and impressive feats of the human mind is its ability to discover and continuously refine its own cognitive strategies. Elucidating the underlying learning and adaptation mechanisms is very difficult because changes in cognitive strategies are not directly observable. One important domain in which strategies and mechanisms are studied is planning. To enable researchers to uncover how people learn how to plan, we offer a tutorial introduction to a recently developed process-tracing paradigm along with a new computational method for measuring the nature and development of a person’s planning strategies from the resulting process-tracing data. Our method allows researchers to reveal experience-driven changes in people’s choice of individual planning operations, planning strategies, strategy types, and the relative contributions of different decision systems. We validate our method on simulated and empirical data. On simulated data, its inferences about the strategies and the relative influence of different decision systems are accurate. When evaluated on human data generated using our process-tracing paradigm, our computational method correctly detects the plasticity-enhancing effect of feedback and the effect of the structure of the environment on people’s planning strategies. Together, these methods can be used to investigate the mechanisms of cognitive plasticity and to elucidate how people acquire complex cognitive skills such as planning and problem-solving. Importantly, our methods can also be used to measure individual differences in cognitive plasticity and examine how different types (pedagogical) interventions affect the acquisition of cognitive skills. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10250277 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102502772023-06-10 A computational process-tracing method for measuring people’s planning strategies and how they change over time Jain, Yash Raj Callaway, Frederick Griffiths, Thomas L. Dayan, Peter He, Ruiqi Krueger, Paul M. Lieder, Falk Behav Res Methods Article One of the most unique and impressive feats of the human mind is its ability to discover and continuously refine its own cognitive strategies. Elucidating the underlying learning and adaptation mechanisms is very difficult because changes in cognitive strategies are not directly observable. One important domain in which strategies and mechanisms are studied is planning. To enable researchers to uncover how people learn how to plan, we offer a tutorial introduction to a recently developed process-tracing paradigm along with a new computational method for measuring the nature and development of a person’s planning strategies from the resulting process-tracing data. Our method allows researchers to reveal experience-driven changes in people’s choice of individual planning operations, planning strategies, strategy types, and the relative contributions of different decision systems. We validate our method on simulated and empirical data. On simulated data, its inferences about the strategies and the relative influence of different decision systems are accurate. When evaluated on human data generated using our process-tracing paradigm, our computational method correctly detects the plasticity-enhancing effect of feedback and the effect of the structure of the environment on people’s planning strategies. Together, these methods can be used to investigate the mechanisms of cognitive plasticity and to elucidate how people acquire complex cognitive skills such as planning and problem-solving. Importantly, our methods can also be used to measure individual differences in cognitive plasticity and examine how different types (pedagogical) interventions affect the acquisition of cognitive skills. Springer US 2022-07-11 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10250277/ /pubmed/35819717 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01789-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Jain, Yash Raj Callaway, Frederick Griffiths, Thomas L. Dayan, Peter He, Ruiqi Krueger, Paul M. Lieder, Falk A computational process-tracing method for measuring people’s planning strategies and how they change over time |
title | A computational process-tracing method for measuring people’s planning strategies and how they change over time |
title_full | A computational process-tracing method for measuring people’s planning strategies and how they change over time |
title_fullStr | A computational process-tracing method for measuring people’s planning strategies and how they change over time |
title_full_unstemmed | A computational process-tracing method for measuring people’s planning strategies and how they change over time |
title_short | A computational process-tracing method for measuring people’s planning strategies and how they change over time |
title_sort | computational process-tracing method for measuring people’s planning strategies and how they change over time |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10250277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35819717 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01789-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jainyashraj acomputationalprocesstracingmethodformeasuringpeoplesplanningstrategiesandhowtheychangeovertime AT callawayfrederick acomputationalprocesstracingmethodformeasuringpeoplesplanningstrategiesandhowtheychangeovertime AT griffithsthomasl acomputationalprocesstracingmethodformeasuringpeoplesplanningstrategiesandhowtheychangeovertime AT dayanpeter acomputationalprocesstracingmethodformeasuringpeoplesplanningstrategiesandhowtheychangeovertime AT heruiqi acomputationalprocesstracingmethodformeasuringpeoplesplanningstrategiesandhowtheychangeovertime AT kruegerpaulm acomputationalprocesstracingmethodformeasuringpeoplesplanningstrategiesandhowtheychangeovertime AT liederfalk acomputationalprocesstracingmethodformeasuringpeoplesplanningstrategiesandhowtheychangeovertime AT jainyashraj computationalprocesstracingmethodformeasuringpeoplesplanningstrategiesandhowtheychangeovertime AT callawayfrederick computationalprocesstracingmethodformeasuringpeoplesplanningstrategiesandhowtheychangeovertime AT griffithsthomasl computationalprocesstracingmethodformeasuringpeoplesplanningstrategiesandhowtheychangeovertime AT dayanpeter computationalprocesstracingmethodformeasuringpeoplesplanningstrategiesandhowtheychangeovertime AT heruiqi computationalprocesstracingmethodformeasuringpeoplesplanningstrategiesandhowtheychangeovertime AT kruegerpaulm computationalprocesstracingmethodformeasuringpeoplesplanningstrategiesandhowtheychangeovertime AT liederfalk computationalprocesstracingmethodformeasuringpeoplesplanningstrategiesandhowtheychangeovertime |