Cargando…

Comparison and fusion prediction model for lung adenocarcinoma with micropapillary and solid pattern using clinicoradiographic, radiomics and deep learning features

To investigate whether the combination scheme of deep learning score (DL-score) and radiomics can improve preoperative diagnosis in the presence of micropapillary/solid (MPP/SOL) patterns in lung adenocarcinoma (ADC). A retrospective cohort of 514 confirmed pathologically lung ADC in 512 patients af...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Fen, Wang, Cheng-Long, Yi, Yin-Qiao, Zhang, Teng, Zhong, Yan, Zhu, Jia-Jia, Li, Hai, Yang, Guang, Yu, Tong-Fu, Xu, Hai, Yuan, Mei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10250309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37291251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36409-5
_version_ 1785055728535339008
author Wang, Fen
Wang, Cheng-Long
Yi, Yin-Qiao
Zhang, Teng
Zhong, Yan
Zhu, Jia-Jia
Li, Hai
Yang, Guang
Yu, Tong-Fu
Xu, Hai
Yuan, Mei
author_facet Wang, Fen
Wang, Cheng-Long
Yi, Yin-Qiao
Zhang, Teng
Zhong, Yan
Zhu, Jia-Jia
Li, Hai
Yang, Guang
Yu, Tong-Fu
Xu, Hai
Yuan, Mei
author_sort Wang, Fen
collection PubMed
description To investigate whether the combination scheme of deep learning score (DL-score) and radiomics can improve preoperative diagnosis in the presence of micropapillary/solid (MPP/SOL) patterns in lung adenocarcinoma (ADC). A retrospective cohort of 514 confirmed pathologically lung ADC in 512 patients after surgery was enrolled. The clinicoradiographic model (model 1) and radiomics model (model 2) were developed with logistic regression. The deep learning model (model 3) was constructed based on the deep learning score (DL-score). The combine model (model 4) was based on DL-score and R-score and clinicoradiographic variables. The performance of these models was evaluated with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and compared using DeLong's test internally and externally. The prediction nomogram was plotted, and clinical utility depicted with decision curve. The performance of model 1, model 2, model 3 and model 4 was supported by AUCs of 0.848, 0.896, 0.906, 0.921 in the Internal validation set, that of 0.700, 0.801, 0.730, 0.827 in external validation set, respectively. These models existed statistical significance in internal validation (model 4 vs model 3, P = 0.016; model 4 vs model 1, P = 0.009, respectively) and external validation (model 4 vs model 2, P = 0.036; model 4 vs model 3, P = 0.047; model 4 vs model 1, P = 0.016, respectively). The decision curve analysis (DCA) demonstrated that model 4 predicting the lung ADC with MPP/SOL structure would be more beneficial than the model 1and model 3 but comparable with the model 2. The combined model can improve preoperative diagnosis in the presence of MPP/SOL pattern in lung ADC in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10250309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102503092023-06-10 Comparison and fusion prediction model for lung adenocarcinoma with micropapillary and solid pattern using clinicoradiographic, radiomics and deep learning features Wang, Fen Wang, Cheng-Long Yi, Yin-Qiao Zhang, Teng Zhong, Yan Zhu, Jia-Jia Li, Hai Yang, Guang Yu, Tong-Fu Xu, Hai Yuan, Mei Sci Rep Article To investigate whether the combination scheme of deep learning score (DL-score) and radiomics can improve preoperative diagnosis in the presence of micropapillary/solid (MPP/SOL) patterns in lung adenocarcinoma (ADC). A retrospective cohort of 514 confirmed pathologically lung ADC in 512 patients after surgery was enrolled. The clinicoradiographic model (model 1) and radiomics model (model 2) were developed with logistic regression. The deep learning model (model 3) was constructed based on the deep learning score (DL-score). The combine model (model 4) was based on DL-score and R-score and clinicoradiographic variables. The performance of these models was evaluated with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and compared using DeLong's test internally and externally. The prediction nomogram was plotted, and clinical utility depicted with decision curve. The performance of model 1, model 2, model 3 and model 4 was supported by AUCs of 0.848, 0.896, 0.906, 0.921 in the Internal validation set, that of 0.700, 0.801, 0.730, 0.827 in external validation set, respectively. These models existed statistical significance in internal validation (model 4 vs model 3, P = 0.016; model 4 vs model 1, P = 0.009, respectively) and external validation (model 4 vs model 2, P = 0.036; model 4 vs model 3, P = 0.047; model 4 vs model 1, P = 0.016, respectively). The decision curve analysis (DCA) demonstrated that model 4 predicting the lung ADC with MPP/SOL structure would be more beneficial than the model 1and model 3 but comparable with the model 2. The combined model can improve preoperative diagnosis in the presence of MPP/SOL pattern in lung ADC in clinical practice. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10250309/ /pubmed/37291251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36409-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Fen
Wang, Cheng-Long
Yi, Yin-Qiao
Zhang, Teng
Zhong, Yan
Zhu, Jia-Jia
Li, Hai
Yang, Guang
Yu, Tong-Fu
Xu, Hai
Yuan, Mei
Comparison and fusion prediction model for lung adenocarcinoma with micropapillary and solid pattern using clinicoradiographic, radiomics and deep learning features
title Comparison and fusion prediction model for lung adenocarcinoma with micropapillary and solid pattern using clinicoradiographic, radiomics and deep learning features
title_full Comparison and fusion prediction model for lung adenocarcinoma with micropapillary and solid pattern using clinicoradiographic, radiomics and deep learning features
title_fullStr Comparison and fusion prediction model for lung adenocarcinoma with micropapillary and solid pattern using clinicoradiographic, radiomics and deep learning features
title_full_unstemmed Comparison and fusion prediction model for lung adenocarcinoma with micropapillary and solid pattern using clinicoradiographic, radiomics and deep learning features
title_short Comparison and fusion prediction model for lung adenocarcinoma with micropapillary and solid pattern using clinicoradiographic, radiomics and deep learning features
title_sort comparison and fusion prediction model for lung adenocarcinoma with micropapillary and solid pattern using clinicoradiographic, radiomics and deep learning features
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10250309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37291251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36409-5
work_keys_str_mv AT wangfen comparisonandfusionpredictionmodelforlungadenocarcinomawithmicropapillaryandsolidpatternusingclinicoradiographicradiomicsanddeeplearningfeatures
AT wangchenglong comparisonandfusionpredictionmodelforlungadenocarcinomawithmicropapillaryandsolidpatternusingclinicoradiographicradiomicsanddeeplearningfeatures
AT yiyinqiao comparisonandfusionpredictionmodelforlungadenocarcinomawithmicropapillaryandsolidpatternusingclinicoradiographicradiomicsanddeeplearningfeatures
AT zhangteng comparisonandfusionpredictionmodelforlungadenocarcinomawithmicropapillaryandsolidpatternusingclinicoradiographicradiomicsanddeeplearningfeatures
AT zhongyan comparisonandfusionpredictionmodelforlungadenocarcinomawithmicropapillaryandsolidpatternusingclinicoradiographicradiomicsanddeeplearningfeatures
AT zhujiajia comparisonandfusionpredictionmodelforlungadenocarcinomawithmicropapillaryandsolidpatternusingclinicoradiographicradiomicsanddeeplearningfeatures
AT lihai comparisonandfusionpredictionmodelforlungadenocarcinomawithmicropapillaryandsolidpatternusingclinicoradiographicradiomicsanddeeplearningfeatures
AT yangguang comparisonandfusionpredictionmodelforlungadenocarcinomawithmicropapillaryandsolidpatternusingclinicoradiographicradiomicsanddeeplearningfeatures
AT yutongfu comparisonandfusionpredictionmodelforlungadenocarcinomawithmicropapillaryandsolidpatternusingclinicoradiographicradiomicsanddeeplearningfeatures
AT xuhai comparisonandfusionpredictionmodelforlungadenocarcinomawithmicropapillaryandsolidpatternusingclinicoradiographicradiomicsanddeeplearningfeatures
AT yuanmei comparisonandfusionpredictionmodelforlungadenocarcinomawithmicropapillaryandsolidpatternusingclinicoradiographicradiomicsanddeeplearningfeatures