Cargando…

The impact of a point‐of‐care visual clinical decision support tool on admissions for cellulitis in the University of Maryland medical system

INTRODUCTION: Cellulitis is commonly diagnosed in emergency departments (EDs), yet roughly one third of ED patients admitted for presumed cellulitis have another, usually benign, condition instead (eg, stasis dermatitis). This suggests there is an opportunity to reduce health care resource use throu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dezman, Zachary D.W., Lemkin, Daniel, Papier, Art, Browne, Brian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10250818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37304858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12969
_version_ 1785055838554030080
author Dezman, Zachary D.W.
Lemkin, Daniel
Papier, Art
Browne, Brian
author_facet Dezman, Zachary D.W.
Lemkin, Daniel
Papier, Art
Browne, Brian
author_sort Dezman, Zachary D.W.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Cellulitis is commonly diagnosed in emergency departments (EDs), yet roughly one third of ED patients admitted for presumed cellulitis have another, usually benign, condition instead (eg, stasis dermatitis). This suggests there is an opportunity to reduce health care resource use through improved diagnosis at the point of care. This study seeks to test whether a clinical decision support (CDS) tool interoperable with the electronic medical record (EMR) can reduce inappropriate hospital admissions and drive more appropriate and accurate care. METHODS: This study was a trial of an EMR‐interoperable, image‐based CDS tool for evaluation of ED patients with suspected cellulitis. At the point of assigning a provisional diagnosis of cellulitis in the EMR, the clinician was randomly prompted to use the CDS. Based on the patient features entered into the CDS by the clinician, the CDS provided the clinician a list of likely diagnoses. The following were recorded: patient demographics, disposition and final diagnosis of patients, and whether antibiotics were prescribed. Logistic regression methods were used to determine the impact of CDS engagement on our primary outcome of admission for cellulitis, adjusted for patient factors. Antibiotic use was a secondary end point. RESULTS: From September 2019 to February 2020 (or 7 months), the CDS tool was deployed in the EMR at 4 major hospitals in the University of Maryland Medical System. There were 1269 encounters for cellulitis during the study period. The engagement with the CDS was low (24.1%, 95/394), but engagement was associated with an absolute reduction in admissions (7.1%, p = 0.03). After adjusting for age greater than 65 years, female sex, non‐White race, and private insurance, CDS engagement was associated with a significant reduction of admissions (adjusted OR = 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.40–0.97, p = 0.04) and antibiotic use (Adjusted OR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.40–0.99, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: CDS engagement was associated with decreased admissions for cellulitis and decreased antibiotic use in this study, despite low levels of CDS engagement. Further research should examine the impact of CDS engagement in other practice environments and measure longer‐term outcomes in patients discharged from the ED.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10250818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102508182023-06-10 The impact of a point‐of‐care visual clinical decision support tool on admissions for cellulitis in the University of Maryland medical system Dezman, Zachary D.W. Lemkin, Daniel Papier, Art Browne, Brian J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open Infectious Disease INTRODUCTION: Cellulitis is commonly diagnosed in emergency departments (EDs), yet roughly one third of ED patients admitted for presumed cellulitis have another, usually benign, condition instead (eg, stasis dermatitis). This suggests there is an opportunity to reduce health care resource use through improved diagnosis at the point of care. This study seeks to test whether a clinical decision support (CDS) tool interoperable with the electronic medical record (EMR) can reduce inappropriate hospital admissions and drive more appropriate and accurate care. METHODS: This study was a trial of an EMR‐interoperable, image‐based CDS tool for evaluation of ED patients with suspected cellulitis. At the point of assigning a provisional diagnosis of cellulitis in the EMR, the clinician was randomly prompted to use the CDS. Based on the patient features entered into the CDS by the clinician, the CDS provided the clinician a list of likely diagnoses. The following were recorded: patient demographics, disposition and final diagnosis of patients, and whether antibiotics were prescribed. Logistic regression methods were used to determine the impact of CDS engagement on our primary outcome of admission for cellulitis, adjusted for patient factors. Antibiotic use was a secondary end point. RESULTS: From September 2019 to February 2020 (or 7 months), the CDS tool was deployed in the EMR at 4 major hospitals in the University of Maryland Medical System. There were 1269 encounters for cellulitis during the study period. The engagement with the CDS was low (24.1%, 95/394), but engagement was associated with an absolute reduction in admissions (7.1%, p = 0.03). After adjusting for age greater than 65 years, female sex, non‐White race, and private insurance, CDS engagement was associated with a significant reduction of admissions (adjusted OR = 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.40–0.97, p = 0.04) and antibiotic use (Adjusted OR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.40–0.99, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: CDS engagement was associated with decreased admissions for cellulitis and decreased antibiotic use in this study, despite low levels of CDS engagement. Further research should examine the impact of CDS engagement in other practice environments and measure longer‐term outcomes in patients discharged from the ED. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10250818/ /pubmed/37304858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12969 Text en © 2023 The Authors. JACEP Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Emergency Physicians. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Infectious Disease
Dezman, Zachary D.W.
Lemkin, Daniel
Papier, Art
Browne, Brian
The impact of a point‐of‐care visual clinical decision support tool on admissions for cellulitis in the University of Maryland medical system
title The impact of a point‐of‐care visual clinical decision support tool on admissions for cellulitis in the University of Maryland medical system
title_full The impact of a point‐of‐care visual clinical decision support tool on admissions for cellulitis in the University of Maryland medical system
title_fullStr The impact of a point‐of‐care visual clinical decision support tool on admissions for cellulitis in the University of Maryland medical system
title_full_unstemmed The impact of a point‐of‐care visual clinical decision support tool on admissions for cellulitis in the University of Maryland medical system
title_short The impact of a point‐of‐care visual clinical decision support tool on admissions for cellulitis in the University of Maryland medical system
title_sort impact of a point‐of‐care visual clinical decision support tool on admissions for cellulitis in the university of maryland medical system
topic Infectious Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10250818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37304858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12969
work_keys_str_mv AT dezmanzacharydw theimpactofapointofcarevisualclinicaldecisionsupporttoolonadmissionsforcellulitisintheuniversityofmarylandmedicalsystem
AT lemkindaniel theimpactofapointofcarevisualclinicaldecisionsupporttoolonadmissionsforcellulitisintheuniversityofmarylandmedicalsystem
AT papierart theimpactofapointofcarevisualclinicaldecisionsupporttoolonadmissionsforcellulitisintheuniversityofmarylandmedicalsystem
AT brownebrian theimpactofapointofcarevisualclinicaldecisionsupporttoolonadmissionsforcellulitisintheuniversityofmarylandmedicalsystem
AT dezmanzacharydw impactofapointofcarevisualclinicaldecisionsupporttoolonadmissionsforcellulitisintheuniversityofmarylandmedicalsystem
AT lemkindaniel impactofapointofcarevisualclinicaldecisionsupporttoolonadmissionsforcellulitisintheuniversityofmarylandmedicalsystem
AT papierart impactofapointofcarevisualclinicaldecisionsupporttoolonadmissionsforcellulitisintheuniversityofmarylandmedicalsystem
AT brownebrian impactofapointofcarevisualclinicaldecisionsupporttoolonadmissionsforcellulitisintheuniversityofmarylandmedicalsystem