Cargando…

Efficacy of different oral H(1) antihistamine treatments on allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION: Oral H(1) antihistamines are the first-line treatment for patients with allergic rhinitis, while it is uncertain which kind and dosage of the antihistamines are more effective in improving symptoms of patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of different oral H(1) antihistamine tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hong, Dongdong, Weng, Juanling, Ye, Meiting, Liu, Yuanxian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10250918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37271114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2023.03.009
_version_ 1785055862987948032
author Hong, Dongdong
Weng, Juanling
Ye, Meiting
Liu, Yuanxian
author_facet Hong, Dongdong
Weng, Juanling
Ye, Meiting
Liu, Yuanxian
author_sort Hong, Dongdong
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Oral H(1) antihistamines are the first-line treatment for patients with allergic rhinitis, while it is uncertain which kind and dosage of the antihistamines are more effective in improving symptoms of patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of different oral H(1) antihistamine treatments on patients with allergic rhinitis by performing a network meta-analysis. METHODS: The search was executed in PubMed, Embase, OVID, the Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov for relevant studies. The network meta-analysis was performed by using Stata 16.0, and the outcome measures of the analysis were symptom score reductions of patients. Relative risks with 95% Confidence Intervals were used in the network meta-analysis to compare the clinical effect of treatments involved, and Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curves (SUCRAs) were also calculated to rank the treatments’ efficacy. RESULTS: 18 eligible randomized controlled studies, involving a total of 9419 participants, were included in this meta-analysis. All the antihistamine treatments outperformed placebo in total symptom score reduction and each individual symptom score reduction. According to the results of SUCRA, rupatadine 20 mg and rupatadine 10 mg were ranked relatively high in reductions of total symptom score (SUCRA: 99.7%, 76.3%), nasal congestion score (SUCRA: 96.4%, 76.4%), rhinorrhea score (SUCRA: 96.6%, 74.6%) and ocular symptom score (SUCRA: 97.2%, 88.8%); rupatadine 20 mg and levocetirizine 5 mg were ranked relatively high in reductions of nasal itching score (SUCRA: 84.8%, 83.4%) and sneezing score (SUCRA: 87.3%, 95.4%); loratadine 10 mg was ranked the lowest in each symptom score reduction besides placebo. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that rupatadine is the most effective in alleviating symptoms of patients with allergic rhinitis among different oral H(1) antihistamine treatments involved, and rupatadine 20 mg performs better than rupatadine 10 mg. While loratadine 10 mg has inferior efficacy for patients to the other antihistamine treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10250918
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102509182023-06-10 Efficacy of different oral H(1) antihistamine treatments on allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Hong, Dongdong Weng, Juanling Ye, Meiting Liu, Yuanxian Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Review Article INTRODUCTION: Oral H(1) antihistamines are the first-line treatment for patients with allergic rhinitis, while it is uncertain which kind and dosage of the antihistamines are more effective in improving symptoms of patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of different oral H(1) antihistamine treatments on patients with allergic rhinitis by performing a network meta-analysis. METHODS: The search was executed in PubMed, Embase, OVID, the Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov for relevant studies. The network meta-analysis was performed by using Stata 16.0, and the outcome measures of the analysis were symptom score reductions of patients. Relative risks with 95% Confidence Intervals were used in the network meta-analysis to compare the clinical effect of treatments involved, and Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curves (SUCRAs) were also calculated to rank the treatments’ efficacy. RESULTS: 18 eligible randomized controlled studies, involving a total of 9419 participants, were included in this meta-analysis. All the antihistamine treatments outperformed placebo in total symptom score reduction and each individual symptom score reduction. According to the results of SUCRA, rupatadine 20 mg and rupatadine 10 mg were ranked relatively high in reductions of total symptom score (SUCRA: 99.7%, 76.3%), nasal congestion score (SUCRA: 96.4%, 76.4%), rhinorrhea score (SUCRA: 96.6%, 74.6%) and ocular symptom score (SUCRA: 97.2%, 88.8%); rupatadine 20 mg and levocetirizine 5 mg were ranked relatively high in reductions of nasal itching score (SUCRA: 84.8%, 83.4%) and sneezing score (SUCRA: 87.3%, 95.4%); loratadine 10 mg was ranked the lowest in each symptom score reduction besides placebo. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that rupatadine is the most effective in alleviating symptoms of patients with allergic rhinitis among different oral H(1) antihistamine treatments involved, and rupatadine 20 mg performs better than rupatadine 10 mg. While loratadine 10 mg has inferior efficacy for patients to the other antihistamine treatments. Elsevier 2023-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10250918/ /pubmed/37271114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2023.03.009 Text en © 2023 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Hong, Dongdong
Weng, Juanling
Ye, Meiting
Liu, Yuanxian
Efficacy of different oral H(1) antihistamine treatments on allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Efficacy of different oral H(1) antihistamine treatments on allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Efficacy of different oral H(1) antihistamine treatments on allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Efficacy of different oral H(1) antihistamine treatments on allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of different oral H(1) antihistamine treatments on allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Efficacy of different oral H(1) antihistamine treatments on allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort efficacy of different oral h(1) antihistamine treatments on allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10250918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37271114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2023.03.009
work_keys_str_mv AT hongdongdong efficacyofdifferentoralh1antihistaminetreatmentsonallergicrhinitisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wengjuanling efficacyofdifferentoralh1antihistaminetreatmentsonallergicrhinitisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yemeiting efficacyofdifferentoralh1antihistaminetreatmentsonallergicrhinitisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liuyuanxian efficacyofdifferentoralh1antihistaminetreatmentsonallergicrhinitisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials