Cargando…

Safety and efficacy in pediatric secondary intraocular lens implantation, in-the-bag versus sulcus implantation: a multicenter, single-blinded randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Treatment of pediatric cataract remains challenging because of the extremely high incidence of postoperative adverse events (AEs), especially the AEs related to the locations of secondary implanted intraocular lens (IOL). There are two common locations for secondary IOL implantation in p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zou, Yingshi, Jin, Ling, Qu, Bo, Chen, Hui, Zeng, Mingbing, Li, Xia, Liu, Xinhua, Luo, Lixia, Liu, Zhenzhen, Liu, Yizhi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10251574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37296411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07411-z
_version_ 1785055975419412480
author Zou, Yingshi
Jin, Ling
Qu, Bo
Chen, Hui
Zeng, Mingbing
Li, Xia
Liu, Xinhua
Luo, Lixia
Liu, Zhenzhen
Liu, Yizhi
author_facet Zou, Yingshi
Jin, Ling
Qu, Bo
Chen, Hui
Zeng, Mingbing
Li, Xia
Liu, Xinhua
Luo, Lixia
Liu, Zhenzhen
Liu, Yizhi
author_sort Zou, Yingshi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Treatment of pediatric cataract remains challenging because of the extremely high incidence of postoperative adverse events (AEs), especially the AEs related to the locations of secondary implanted intraocular lens (IOL). There are two common locations for secondary IOL implantation in pediatric aphakic eyes: ciliary sulcus or in-the-bag implantation. However, there are currently no large, prospective studies comparing complication rates and visual prognosis of in-the-bag versus ciliarysulcus secondary IOL implantation in pediatric patients. Whether or how much secondary in-the-bag IOL implantation benefits the pediatric patients more than sulcus implantation and deserves to be performed routinely by surgeons remains to be elucidated. Here, we describe the protocol of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two approaches of IOL implantation in pediatric aphakia. METHODS: The study is a multicenter, single-blinded RCT with 10 years of follow-up. Overall, a minimum of 286 eyes (approximately 228 participants assuming 75% have two study eyes) will be recruited. This study will be carried out in four eye clinics across China. Consecutive eligible patients are randomized to undergo either secondary in-the-bag IOL implantation or secondary sulcus IOL implantation. Participants with two eyes eligible will receive the same treatment. The primary outcomes are IOL decentration and the incidence of glaucoma-related AEs. The secondary outcomes include the incidence of other AEs, IOL tilt, visual acuity, and ocular refractive power. Analysis of the primary and secondary outcomes is to be based on the intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis. Statistical analyses will include the χ(2) test or Fisher’s exact test for the primary outcome, mixed model and generalized estimated equation (GEE) model for the secondary outcome, Kaplan–Meier survival curves for the cumulative probability of glaucoma-related AEs over time in each group. DISCUSSION: To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first RCT to evaluate the safety and efficacy of secondary IOL implantation in pediatric aphakia. The results will provide high-quality evidence for the clinical guidelines for the treatment of pediatric aphakia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05136950. Registered on 1 November 2021.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10251574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102515742023-06-10 Safety and efficacy in pediatric secondary intraocular lens implantation, in-the-bag versus sulcus implantation: a multicenter, single-blinded randomized controlled trial Zou, Yingshi Jin, Ling Qu, Bo Chen, Hui Zeng, Mingbing Li, Xia Liu, Xinhua Luo, Lixia Liu, Zhenzhen Liu, Yizhi Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Treatment of pediatric cataract remains challenging because of the extremely high incidence of postoperative adverse events (AEs), especially the AEs related to the locations of secondary implanted intraocular lens (IOL). There are two common locations for secondary IOL implantation in pediatric aphakic eyes: ciliary sulcus or in-the-bag implantation. However, there are currently no large, prospective studies comparing complication rates and visual prognosis of in-the-bag versus ciliarysulcus secondary IOL implantation in pediatric patients. Whether or how much secondary in-the-bag IOL implantation benefits the pediatric patients more than sulcus implantation and deserves to be performed routinely by surgeons remains to be elucidated. Here, we describe the protocol of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two approaches of IOL implantation in pediatric aphakia. METHODS: The study is a multicenter, single-blinded RCT with 10 years of follow-up. Overall, a minimum of 286 eyes (approximately 228 participants assuming 75% have two study eyes) will be recruited. This study will be carried out in four eye clinics across China. Consecutive eligible patients are randomized to undergo either secondary in-the-bag IOL implantation or secondary sulcus IOL implantation. Participants with two eyes eligible will receive the same treatment. The primary outcomes are IOL decentration and the incidence of glaucoma-related AEs. The secondary outcomes include the incidence of other AEs, IOL tilt, visual acuity, and ocular refractive power. Analysis of the primary and secondary outcomes is to be based on the intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis. Statistical analyses will include the χ(2) test or Fisher’s exact test for the primary outcome, mixed model and generalized estimated equation (GEE) model for the secondary outcome, Kaplan–Meier survival curves for the cumulative probability of glaucoma-related AEs over time in each group. DISCUSSION: To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first RCT to evaluate the safety and efficacy of secondary IOL implantation in pediatric aphakia. The results will provide high-quality evidence for the clinical guidelines for the treatment of pediatric aphakia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05136950. Registered on 1 November 2021. BioMed Central 2023-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10251574/ /pubmed/37296411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07411-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Zou, Yingshi
Jin, Ling
Qu, Bo
Chen, Hui
Zeng, Mingbing
Li, Xia
Liu, Xinhua
Luo, Lixia
Liu, Zhenzhen
Liu, Yizhi
Safety and efficacy in pediatric secondary intraocular lens implantation, in-the-bag versus sulcus implantation: a multicenter, single-blinded randomized controlled trial
title Safety and efficacy in pediatric secondary intraocular lens implantation, in-the-bag versus sulcus implantation: a multicenter, single-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_full Safety and efficacy in pediatric secondary intraocular lens implantation, in-the-bag versus sulcus implantation: a multicenter, single-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy in pediatric secondary intraocular lens implantation, in-the-bag versus sulcus implantation: a multicenter, single-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy in pediatric secondary intraocular lens implantation, in-the-bag versus sulcus implantation: a multicenter, single-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_short Safety and efficacy in pediatric secondary intraocular lens implantation, in-the-bag versus sulcus implantation: a multicenter, single-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_sort safety and efficacy in pediatric secondary intraocular lens implantation, in-the-bag versus sulcus implantation: a multicenter, single-blinded randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10251574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37296411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07411-z
work_keys_str_mv AT zouyingshi safetyandefficacyinpediatricsecondaryintraocularlensimplantationinthebagversussulcusimplantationamulticentersingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jinling safetyandefficacyinpediatricsecondaryintraocularlensimplantationinthebagversussulcusimplantationamulticentersingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT qubo safetyandefficacyinpediatricsecondaryintraocularlensimplantationinthebagversussulcusimplantationamulticentersingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chenhui safetyandefficacyinpediatricsecondaryintraocularlensimplantationinthebagversussulcusimplantationamulticentersingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zengmingbing safetyandefficacyinpediatricsecondaryintraocularlensimplantationinthebagversussulcusimplantationamulticentersingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lixia safetyandefficacyinpediatricsecondaryintraocularlensimplantationinthebagversussulcusimplantationamulticentersingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liuxinhua safetyandefficacyinpediatricsecondaryintraocularlensimplantationinthebagversussulcusimplantationamulticentersingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT luolixia safetyandefficacyinpediatricsecondaryintraocularlensimplantationinthebagversussulcusimplantationamulticentersingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liuzhenzhen safetyandefficacyinpediatricsecondaryintraocularlensimplantationinthebagversussulcusimplantationamulticentersingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liuyizhi safetyandefficacyinpediatricsecondaryintraocularlensimplantationinthebagversussulcusimplantationamulticentersingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial