Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Defects After Root Canal Preparation Using Various Nickel Titanium Files: An In Vitro Study

Aim: This study set out to compare the damage done to dentin by three distinct titanium file brands - the Hyflex EDM, the ProTaper Next, and the Waveone Gold Nickel - in order to draw conclusions about which one is the most effective. Materials and methods: Forty-first premolars in the mandible with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Batra, Renu, Dixit, Ankita, Tiwari, Anushree, Kumar, Amit, Sinha, Shagun, Badnaware, Sheetal, Singh, Ramanpal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10252150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37303406
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38829
_version_ 1785056101254823936
author Batra, Renu
Dixit, Ankita
Tiwari, Anushree
Kumar, Amit
Sinha, Shagun
Badnaware, Sheetal
Singh, Ramanpal
author_facet Batra, Renu
Dixit, Ankita
Tiwari, Anushree
Kumar, Amit
Sinha, Shagun
Badnaware, Sheetal
Singh, Ramanpal
author_sort Batra, Renu
collection PubMed
description Aim: This study set out to compare the damage done to dentin by three distinct titanium file brands - the Hyflex EDM, the ProTaper Next, and the Waveone Gold Nickel - in order to draw conclusions about which one is the most effective. Materials and methods: Forty-first premolars in the mandible with straight canals and single roots were instrumented using Hyflex EDM, Waveone Gold, and Protaper Next. Dentinal flaws after endodontic treatment were studied by sectioning specimens using a hard tissue microtome and analyzing them under a stereomicroscope. Results: There was no discernible variation between the groups in the coronal third (p=0.312) or apical third (p=0.076). Hyflex EDM and Protaper Next differed significantly in the middle portion of the tape (p=0.016). The Hyflex EDM sample had the fewest cracks. There was no statistically significant difference between Hyflex EDM and Waveone Gold; however, Hyflex EDM had fewer fractures in the middle third of the sample than Waveone Gold did. Conclusion:Electric discharge machining (EDM) files made from Hyflex proved to be far superior to their Protaper Next and Waveone Gold counterparts as they induced the fewest cracks in the middle third of the root dentin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10252150
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102521502023-06-10 Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Defects After Root Canal Preparation Using Various Nickel Titanium Files: An In Vitro Study Batra, Renu Dixit, Ankita Tiwari, Anushree Kumar, Amit Sinha, Shagun Badnaware, Sheetal Singh, Ramanpal Cureus Dentistry Aim: This study set out to compare the damage done to dentin by three distinct titanium file brands - the Hyflex EDM, the ProTaper Next, and the Waveone Gold Nickel - in order to draw conclusions about which one is the most effective. Materials and methods: Forty-first premolars in the mandible with straight canals and single roots were instrumented using Hyflex EDM, Waveone Gold, and Protaper Next. Dentinal flaws after endodontic treatment were studied by sectioning specimens using a hard tissue microtome and analyzing them under a stereomicroscope. Results: There was no discernible variation between the groups in the coronal third (p=0.312) or apical third (p=0.076). Hyflex EDM and Protaper Next differed significantly in the middle portion of the tape (p=0.016). The Hyflex EDM sample had the fewest cracks. There was no statistically significant difference between Hyflex EDM and Waveone Gold; however, Hyflex EDM had fewer fractures in the middle third of the sample than Waveone Gold did. Conclusion:Electric discharge machining (EDM) files made from Hyflex proved to be far superior to their Protaper Next and Waveone Gold counterparts as they induced the fewest cracks in the middle third of the root dentin. Cureus 2023-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10252150/ /pubmed/37303406 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38829 Text en Copyright © 2023, Batra et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Dentistry
Batra, Renu
Dixit, Ankita
Tiwari, Anushree
Kumar, Amit
Sinha, Shagun
Badnaware, Sheetal
Singh, Ramanpal
Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Defects After Root Canal Preparation Using Various Nickel Titanium Files: An In Vitro Study
title Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Defects After Root Canal Preparation Using Various Nickel Titanium Files: An In Vitro Study
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Defects After Root Canal Preparation Using Various Nickel Titanium Files: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Defects After Root Canal Preparation Using Various Nickel Titanium Files: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Defects After Root Canal Preparation Using Various Nickel Titanium Files: An In Vitro Study
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Defects After Root Canal Preparation Using Various Nickel Titanium Files: An In Vitro Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of dentinal defects after root canal preparation using various nickel titanium files: an in vitro study
topic Dentistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10252150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37303406
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38829
work_keys_str_mv AT batrarenu comparativeevaluationofdentinaldefectsafterrootcanalpreparationusingvariousnickeltitaniumfilesaninvitrostudy
AT dixitankita comparativeevaluationofdentinaldefectsafterrootcanalpreparationusingvariousnickeltitaniumfilesaninvitrostudy
AT tiwarianushree comparativeevaluationofdentinaldefectsafterrootcanalpreparationusingvariousnickeltitaniumfilesaninvitrostudy
AT kumaramit comparativeevaluationofdentinaldefectsafterrootcanalpreparationusingvariousnickeltitaniumfilesaninvitrostudy
AT sinhashagun comparativeevaluationofdentinaldefectsafterrootcanalpreparationusingvariousnickeltitaniumfilesaninvitrostudy
AT badnawaresheetal comparativeevaluationofdentinaldefectsafterrootcanalpreparationusingvariousnickeltitaniumfilesaninvitrostudy
AT singhramanpal comparativeevaluationofdentinaldefectsafterrootcanalpreparationusingvariousnickeltitaniumfilesaninvitrostudy