Cargando…

Evaluation of the BioFire(®) FilmArray(®) Pneumonia Panel with Conventional Bacterial Culture in Conjunction with Leukocyte Esterase Test

We evaluated the performance of the BioFire(®) FilmArray(®) Pneumonia panel (PN-panel) in detecting bacterial pathogens by comparing it to cultures and to the usefulness of the leukocyte esterase (LE) urine strip test. Between January and June 2022, a total of 67 sputum specimens were obtained from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoo, In Young, Seok, Hyun Soo, Kwon, Joo An, Lee, Jongmin, Jo, Sungjin, Kim, Soo Young, Park, Yeon-Joon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10252269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37296700
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13111847
_version_ 1785056129562181632
author Yoo, In Young
Seok, Hyun Soo
Kwon, Joo An
Lee, Jongmin
Jo, Sungjin
Kim, Soo Young
Park, Yeon-Joon
author_facet Yoo, In Young
Seok, Hyun Soo
Kwon, Joo An
Lee, Jongmin
Jo, Sungjin
Kim, Soo Young
Park, Yeon-Joon
author_sort Yoo, In Young
collection PubMed
description We evaluated the performance of the BioFire(®) FilmArray(®) Pneumonia panel (PN-panel) in detecting bacterial pathogens by comparing it to cultures and to the usefulness of the leukocyte esterase (LE) urine strip test. Between January and June 2022, a total of 67 sputum specimens were obtained from community-acquired pneumonia patients. The PN-panel and LE test were performed simultaneously with conventional cultures. The pathogen detection rates of the PN-panel and culture were 40/67 (59.7%) and 25/67 (37.3%), respectively. The concordance rate between the PN-panel and culture was high (76.9%) when the bacterial burden was high (10(7) copies/mL), but it was low (8.6%) when it was 10(4−6) copies/mL, irrespective of the sputum quality. According to the LE positivity, the overall culture positive rate and PN-panel positive rate were significantly higher among the LE-positive specimens (23/45, 31/45) than among the LE-negative specimens (2/21, 8/21). Moreover, the difference in concordance rate between the PN-panel test and culture was significant according to the LE positivity, but not the Gram stain grading. In conclusion, the PN-panel showed high concordance when the bacterial burden was high (10(7) copies/mL) and ancillary use of LE test will be helpful in interpreting the PN-panel results, especially when the copy number of bacterial pathogens is low.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10252269
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102522692023-06-10 Evaluation of the BioFire(®) FilmArray(®) Pneumonia Panel with Conventional Bacterial Culture in Conjunction with Leukocyte Esterase Test Yoo, In Young Seok, Hyun Soo Kwon, Joo An Lee, Jongmin Jo, Sungjin Kim, Soo Young Park, Yeon-Joon Diagnostics (Basel) Communication We evaluated the performance of the BioFire(®) FilmArray(®) Pneumonia panel (PN-panel) in detecting bacterial pathogens by comparing it to cultures and to the usefulness of the leukocyte esterase (LE) urine strip test. Between January and June 2022, a total of 67 sputum specimens were obtained from community-acquired pneumonia patients. The PN-panel and LE test were performed simultaneously with conventional cultures. The pathogen detection rates of the PN-panel and culture were 40/67 (59.7%) and 25/67 (37.3%), respectively. The concordance rate between the PN-panel and culture was high (76.9%) when the bacterial burden was high (10(7) copies/mL), but it was low (8.6%) when it was 10(4−6) copies/mL, irrespective of the sputum quality. According to the LE positivity, the overall culture positive rate and PN-panel positive rate were significantly higher among the LE-positive specimens (23/45, 31/45) than among the LE-negative specimens (2/21, 8/21). Moreover, the difference in concordance rate between the PN-panel test and culture was significant according to the LE positivity, but not the Gram stain grading. In conclusion, the PN-panel showed high concordance when the bacterial burden was high (10(7) copies/mL) and ancillary use of LE test will be helpful in interpreting the PN-panel results, especially when the copy number of bacterial pathogens is low. MDPI 2023-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10252269/ /pubmed/37296700 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13111847 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Yoo, In Young
Seok, Hyun Soo
Kwon, Joo An
Lee, Jongmin
Jo, Sungjin
Kim, Soo Young
Park, Yeon-Joon
Evaluation of the BioFire(®) FilmArray(®) Pneumonia Panel with Conventional Bacterial Culture in Conjunction with Leukocyte Esterase Test
title Evaluation of the BioFire(®) FilmArray(®) Pneumonia Panel with Conventional Bacterial Culture in Conjunction with Leukocyte Esterase Test
title_full Evaluation of the BioFire(®) FilmArray(®) Pneumonia Panel with Conventional Bacterial Culture in Conjunction with Leukocyte Esterase Test
title_fullStr Evaluation of the BioFire(®) FilmArray(®) Pneumonia Panel with Conventional Bacterial Culture in Conjunction with Leukocyte Esterase Test
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the BioFire(®) FilmArray(®) Pneumonia Panel with Conventional Bacterial Culture in Conjunction with Leukocyte Esterase Test
title_short Evaluation of the BioFire(®) FilmArray(®) Pneumonia Panel with Conventional Bacterial Culture in Conjunction with Leukocyte Esterase Test
title_sort evaluation of the biofire(®) filmarray(®) pneumonia panel with conventional bacterial culture in conjunction with leukocyte esterase test
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10252269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37296700
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13111847
work_keys_str_mv AT yooinyoung evaluationofthebiofirefilmarraypneumoniapanelwithconventionalbacterialcultureinconjunctionwithleukocyteesterasetest
AT seokhyunsoo evaluationofthebiofirefilmarraypneumoniapanelwithconventionalbacterialcultureinconjunctionwithleukocyteesterasetest
AT kwonjooan evaluationofthebiofirefilmarraypneumoniapanelwithconventionalbacterialcultureinconjunctionwithleukocyteesterasetest
AT leejongmin evaluationofthebiofirefilmarraypneumoniapanelwithconventionalbacterialcultureinconjunctionwithleukocyteesterasetest
AT josungjin evaluationofthebiofirefilmarraypneumoniapanelwithconventionalbacterialcultureinconjunctionwithleukocyteesterasetest
AT kimsooyoung evaluationofthebiofirefilmarraypneumoniapanelwithconventionalbacterialcultureinconjunctionwithleukocyteesterasetest
AT parkyeonjoon evaluationofthebiofirefilmarraypneumoniapanelwithconventionalbacterialcultureinconjunctionwithleukocyteesterasetest