Cargando…

Accurate SARC-F Score in Patients with Liver Disease

SARC-F is a well-accepted screening tool for sarcopenia. A SARC-F value of 1 point is reported to be more discriminating in identifying sarcopenia than 4 points (recommended cutoff point). The prognostic impact of the SARC-F score was investigated in patients with liver disease (LD, n = 269, median...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsui, Masahiro, Asai, Akira, Ushiro, Kosuke, Onishi, Saori, Nishikawa, Tomohiro, Yokohama, Keisuke, Ohama, Hideko, Tsuchimoto, Yusuke, Kim, Soo Ki, Nishikawa, Hiroki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10252464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37296811
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13111959
_version_ 1785056177618419712
author Matsui, Masahiro
Asai, Akira
Ushiro, Kosuke
Onishi, Saori
Nishikawa, Tomohiro
Yokohama, Keisuke
Ohama, Hideko
Tsuchimoto, Yusuke
Kim, Soo Ki
Nishikawa, Hiroki
author_facet Matsui, Masahiro
Asai, Akira
Ushiro, Kosuke
Onishi, Saori
Nishikawa, Tomohiro
Yokohama, Keisuke
Ohama, Hideko
Tsuchimoto, Yusuke
Kim, Soo Ki
Nishikawa, Hiroki
author_sort Matsui, Masahiro
collection PubMed
description SARC-F is a well-accepted screening tool for sarcopenia. A SARC-F value of 1 point is reported to be more discriminating in identifying sarcopenia than 4 points (recommended cutoff point). The prognostic impact of the SARC-F score was investigated in patients with liver disease (LD, n = 269, median age = 71 years, 96 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases). Factors associated with SARC-F ≥ 4 points and SARC-F ≥ 1 point were also examined. In the multivariate analysis, age (p = 0.048), and Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) score (p = 0.0365) were significant factors linked to SARC-F ≥ 1 point. In our patients with LD, the SARC-F score is well correlated with the GNRI score. The 1-year cumulative overall survival ratio in patients with SARC-F ≥ 1 (n = 159) and SARC-F 0 (n = 110) was 78.3% and 90.1% (p = 0.0181). After excluding 96 HCC cases, similar tendencies were found (p = 0.0289). In the receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis based on the prognosis for the SARC-F score, the area under the ROC was 0.60. The sensitivity was 0.57, the specificity was 0.62, and the optimal cutoff point of the SARC-F score was 1. In conclusion, sarcopenia in LDs can be affected by nutritional conditions. A SARC-F score of ≥1 is more useful than a score of 4 in predicting the prognosis of patients with LD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10252464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102524642023-06-10 Accurate SARC-F Score in Patients with Liver Disease Matsui, Masahiro Asai, Akira Ushiro, Kosuke Onishi, Saori Nishikawa, Tomohiro Yokohama, Keisuke Ohama, Hideko Tsuchimoto, Yusuke Kim, Soo Ki Nishikawa, Hiroki Diagnostics (Basel) Article SARC-F is a well-accepted screening tool for sarcopenia. A SARC-F value of 1 point is reported to be more discriminating in identifying sarcopenia than 4 points (recommended cutoff point). The prognostic impact of the SARC-F score was investigated in patients with liver disease (LD, n = 269, median age = 71 years, 96 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases). Factors associated with SARC-F ≥ 4 points and SARC-F ≥ 1 point were also examined. In the multivariate analysis, age (p = 0.048), and Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) score (p = 0.0365) were significant factors linked to SARC-F ≥ 1 point. In our patients with LD, the SARC-F score is well correlated with the GNRI score. The 1-year cumulative overall survival ratio in patients with SARC-F ≥ 1 (n = 159) and SARC-F 0 (n = 110) was 78.3% and 90.1% (p = 0.0181). After excluding 96 HCC cases, similar tendencies were found (p = 0.0289). In the receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis based on the prognosis for the SARC-F score, the area under the ROC was 0.60. The sensitivity was 0.57, the specificity was 0.62, and the optimal cutoff point of the SARC-F score was 1. In conclusion, sarcopenia in LDs can be affected by nutritional conditions. A SARC-F score of ≥1 is more useful than a score of 4 in predicting the prognosis of patients with LD. MDPI 2023-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10252464/ /pubmed/37296811 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13111959 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Matsui, Masahiro
Asai, Akira
Ushiro, Kosuke
Onishi, Saori
Nishikawa, Tomohiro
Yokohama, Keisuke
Ohama, Hideko
Tsuchimoto, Yusuke
Kim, Soo Ki
Nishikawa, Hiroki
Accurate SARC-F Score in Patients with Liver Disease
title Accurate SARC-F Score in Patients with Liver Disease
title_full Accurate SARC-F Score in Patients with Liver Disease
title_fullStr Accurate SARC-F Score in Patients with Liver Disease
title_full_unstemmed Accurate SARC-F Score in Patients with Liver Disease
title_short Accurate SARC-F Score in Patients with Liver Disease
title_sort accurate sarc-f score in patients with liver disease
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10252464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37296811
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13111959
work_keys_str_mv AT matsuimasahiro accuratesarcfscoreinpatientswithliverdisease
AT asaiakira accuratesarcfscoreinpatientswithliverdisease
AT ushirokosuke accuratesarcfscoreinpatientswithliverdisease
AT onishisaori accuratesarcfscoreinpatientswithliverdisease
AT nishikawatomohiro accuratesarcfscoreinpatientswithliverdisease
AT yokohamakeisuke accuratesarcfscoreinpatientswithliverdisease
AT ohamahideko accuratesarcfscoreinpatientswithliverdisease
AT tsuchimotoyusuke accuratesarcfscoreinpatientswithliverdisease
AT kimsooki accuratesarcfscoreinpatientswithliverdisease
AT nishikawahiroki accuratesarcfscoreinpatientswithliverdisease