Cargando…
Accurate SARC-F Score in Patients with Liver Disease
SARC-F is a well-accepted screening tool for sarcopenia. A SARC-F value of 1 point is reported to be more discriminating in identifying sarcopenia than 4 points (recommended cutoff point). The prognostic impact of the SARC-F score was investigated in patients with liver disease (LD, n = 269, median...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10252464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37296811 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13111959 |
_version_ | 1785056177618419712 |
---|---|
author | Matsui, Masahiro Asai, Akira Ushiro, Kosuke Onishi, Saori Nishikawa, Tomohiro Yokohama, Keisuke Ohama, Hideko Tsuchimoto, Yusuke Kim, Soo Ki Nishikawa, Hiroki |
author_facet | Matsui, Masahiro Asai, Akira Ushiro, Kosuke Onishi, Saori Nishikawa, Tomohiro Yokohama, Keisuke Ohama, Hideko Tsuchimoto, Yusuke Kim, Soo Ki Nishikawa, Hiroki |
author_sort | Matsui, Masahiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | SARC-F is a well-accepted screening tool for sarcopenia. A SARC-F value of 1 point is reported to be more discriminating in identifying sarcopenia than 4 points (recommended cutoff point). The prognostic impact of the SARC-F score was investigated in patients with liver disease (LD, n = 269, median age = 71 years, 96 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases). Factors associated with SARC-F ≥ 4 points and SARC-F ≥ 1 point were also examined. In the multivariate analysis, age (p = 0.048), and Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) score (p = 0.0365) were significant factors linked to SARC-F ≥ 1 point. In our patients with LD, the SARC-F score is well correlated with the GNRI score. The 1-year cumulative overall survival ratio in patients with SARC-F ≥ 1 (n = 159) and SARC-F 0 (n = 110) was 78.3% and 90.1% (p = 0.0181). After excluding 96 HCC cases, similar tendencies were found (p = 0.0289). In the receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis based on the prognosis for the SARC-F score, the area under the ROC was 0.60. The sensitivity was 0.57, the specificity was 0.62, and the optimal cutoff point of the SARC-F score was 1. In conclusion, sarcopenia in LDs can be affected by nutritional conditions. A SARC-F score of ≥1 is more useful than a score of 4 in predicting the prognosis of patients with LD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10252464 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102524642023-06-10 Accurate SARC-F Score in Patients with Liver Disease Matsui, Masahiro Asai, Akira Ushiro, Kosuke Onishi, Saori Nishikawa, Tomohiro Yokohama, Keisuke Ohama, Hideko Tsuchimoto, Yusuke Kim, Soo Ki Nishikawa, Hiroki Diagnostics (Basel) Article SARC-F is a well-accepted screening tool for sarcopenia. A SARC-F value of 1 point is reported to be more discriminating in identifying sarcopenia than 4 points (recommended cutoff point). The prognostic impact of the SARC-F score was investigated in patients with liver disease (LD, n = 269, median age = 71 years, 96 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases). Factors associated with SARC-F ≥ 4 points and SARC-F ≥ 1 point were also examined. In the multivariate analysis, age (p = 0.048), and Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) score (p = 0.0365) were significant factors linked to SARC-F ≥ 1 point. In our patients with LD, the SARC-F score is well correlated with the GNRI score. The 1-year cumulative overall survival ratio in patients with SARC-F ≥ 1 (n = 159) and SARC-F 0 (n = 110) was 78.3% and 90.1% (p = 0.0181). After excluding 96 HCC cases, similar tendencies were found (p = 0.0289). In the receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis based on the prognosis for the SARC-F score, the area under the ROC was 0.60. The sensitivity was 0.57, the specificity was 0.62, and the optimal cutoff point of the SARC-F score was 1. In conclusion, sarcopenia in LDs can be affected by nutritional conditions. A SARC-F score of ≥1 is more useful than a score of 4 in predicting the prognosis of patients with LD. MDPI 2023-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10252464/ /pubmed/37296811 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13111959 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Matsui, Masahiro Asai, Akira Ushiro, Kosuke Onishi, Saori Nishikawa, Tomohiro Yokohama, Keisuke Ohama, Hideko Tsuchimoto, Yusuke Kim, Soo Ki Nishikawa, Hiroki Accurate SARC-F Score in Patients with Liver Disease |
title | Accurate SARC-F Score in Patients with Liver Disease |
title_full | Accurate SARC-F Score in Patients with Liver Disease |
title_fullStr | Accurate SARC-F Score in Patients with Liver Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Accurate SARC-F Score in Patients with Liver Disease |
title_short | Accurate SARC-F Score in Patients with Liver Disease |
title_sort | accurate sarc-f score in patients with liver disease |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10252464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37296811 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13111959 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matsuimasahiro accuratesarcfscoreinpatientswithliverdisease AT asaiakira accuratesarcfscoreinpatientswithliverdisease AT ushirokosuke accuratesarcfscoreinpatientswithliverdisease AT onishisaori accuratesarcfscoreinpatientswithliverdisease AT nishikawatomohiro accuratesarcfscoreinpatientswithliverdisease AT yokohamakeisuke accuratesarcfscoreinpatientswithliverdisease AT ohamahideko accuratesarcfscoreinpatientswithliverdisease AT tsuchimotoyusuke accuratesarcfscoreinpatientswithliverdisease AT kimsooki accuratesarcfscoreinpatientswithliverdisease AT nishikawahiroki accuratesarcfscoreinpatientswithliverdisease |