Cargando…

Impact of Robotic-Assisted Gait Training in Subacute Spinal Cord Injury Patients on Outcome Measure

The improvement of walking ability is a primary goal for spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. Robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) is an innovative method for its improvement. This study evaluates the influence of RAGT vs. dynamic parapodium training (DPT) in improving gait motor functions in SCI pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tarnacka, Beata, Korczyński, Bogumił, Frasuńska, Justyna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10252491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37296818
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13111966
_version_ 1785056183876321280
author Tarnacka, Beata
Korczyński, Bogumił
Frasuńska, Justyna
author_facet Tarnacka, Beata
Korczyński, Bogumił
Frasuńska, Justyna
author_sort Tarnacka, Beata
collection PubMed
description The improvement of walking ability is a primary goal for spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. Robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) is an innovative method for its improvement. This study evaluates the influence of RAGT vs. dynamic parapodium training (DPT) in improving gait motor functions in SCI patients. In this single-centre, single-blinded study, we enrolled 105 (39 and 64 with complete and incomplete SCI, respectively) patients. The investigated subjects received gait training with RAGT (experimental S1-group) and DPT (control S0-group), with six training sessions per week over seven weeks. The American Spinal Cord Injury Association Impairment Scale Motor Score (MS), Spinal Cord Independence Measure, version-III (SCIM-III), Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury, version-II (WISCI-II), and Barthel Index (BI) were assessed in each patient before and after sessions. Patients with incomplete SCI assigned to the S1 rehabilitation group achieved more significant improvement in MS [2.58 (SE 1.21, p < 0.05)] and WISCI-II [3.07 (SE 1.02, p < 0.01])] scores in comparison with patients assigned to the S0 group. Despite the described improvement in the MS motor score, no progression between grades of AIS (A to B to C to D) was observed. A nonsignificant improvement between the groups for SCIM-III and BI was found. RAGT significantly improved gait functional parameters in SCI patients in comparison with conventional gait training with DPT. RAGT is a valid treatment option in SCI patients in the subacute phase. DPT should not be recommended for patients with incomplete SCI (AIS-C); in those patients, RAGT rehabilitation programs should be taken into consideration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10252491
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102524912023-06-10 Impact of Robotic-Assisted Gait Training in Subacute Spinal Cord Injury Patients on Outcome Measure Tarnacka, Beata Korczyński, Bogumił Frasuńska, Justyna Diagnostics (Basel) Article The improvement of walking ability is a primary goal for spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. Robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) is an innovative method for its improvement. This study evaluates the influence of RAGT vs. dynamic parapodium training (DPT) in improving gait motor functions in SCI patients. In this single-centre, single-blinded study, we enrolled 105 (39 and 64 with complete and incomplete SCI, respectively) patients. The investigated subjects received gait training with RAGT (experimental S1-group) and DPT (control S0-group), with six training sessions per week over seven weeks. The American Spinal Cord Injury Association Impairment Scale Motor Score (MS), Spinal Cord Independence Measure, version-III (SCIM-III), Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury, version-II (WISCI-II), and Barthel Index (BI) were assessed in each patient before and after sessions. Patients with incomplete SCI assigned to the S1 rehabilitation group achieved more significant improvement in MS [2.58 (SE 1.21, p < 0.05)] and WISCI-II [3.07 (SE 1.02, p < 0.01])] scores in comparison with patients assigned to the S0 group. Despite the described improvement in the MS motor score, no progression between grades of AIS (A to B to C to D) was observed. A nonsignificant improvement between the groups for SCIM-III and BI was found. RAGT significantly improved gait functional parameters in SCI patients in comparison with conventional gait training with DPT. RAGT is a valid treatment option in SCI patients in the subacute phase. DPT should not be recommended for patients with incomplete SCI (AIS-C); in those patients, RAGT rehabilitation programs should be taken into consideration. MDPI 2023-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10252491/ /pubmed/37296818 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13111966 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tarnacka, Beata
Korczyński, Bogumił
Frasuńska, Justyna
Impact of Robotic-Assisted Gait Training in Subacute Spinal Cord Injury Patients on Outcome Measure
title Impact of Robotic-Assisted Gait Training in Subacute Spinal Cord Injury Patients on Outcome Measure
title_full Impact of Robotic-Assisted Gait Training in Subacute Spinal Cord Injury Patients on Outcome Measure
title_fullStr Impact of Robotic-Assisted Gait Training in Subacute Spinal Cord Injury Patients on Outcome Measure
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Robotic-Assisted Gait Training in Subacute Spinal Cord Injury Patients on Outcome Measure
title_short Impact of Robotic-Assisted Gait Training in Subacute Spinal Cord Injury Patients on Outcome Measure
title_sort impact of robotic-assisted gait training in subacute spinal cord injury patients on outcome measure
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10252491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37296818
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13111966
work_keys_str_mv AT tarnackabeata impactofroboticassistedgaittraininginsubacutespinalcordinjurypatientsonoutcomemeasure
AT korczynskibogumił impactofroboticassistedgaittraininginsubacutespinalcordinjurypatientsonoutcomemeasure
AT frasunskajustyna impactofroboticassistedgaittraininginsubacutespinalcordinjurypatientsonoutcomemeasure