Cargando…

Teledermatology Evaluation and Feedback Systems: A Tool for Improving Care

Chile is a country where teledermatology has been growing exponentially since the implementation of a single national asynchronous teledermatology platform for the public system in December 2018. To ensure the quality of care in teledermatology systems, it is crucial to evaluate the fulfillment of b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gatica, José Luis, Aragón-Caqueo, Diego, Aedo, Gabriel, Fuenzalida, Héctor, Loubies, Rodrigo, Aedo, Sócrates, Carrasco, María Francisca, Sabando, Vezna, Cunill, Carolina, Letelier, María José
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10252681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37297766
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11111626
_version_ 1785056228962992128
author Gatica, José Luis
Aragón-Caqueo, Diego
Aedo, Gabriel
Fuenzalida, Héctor
Loubies, Rodrigo
Aedo, Sócrates
Carrasco, María Francisca
Sabando, Vezna
Cunill, Carolina
Letelier, María José
author_facet Gatica, José Luis
Aragón-Caqueo, Diego
Aedo, Gabriel
Fuenzalida, Héctor
Loubies, Rodrigo
Aedo, Sócrates
Carrasco, María Francisca
Sabando, Vezna
Cunill, Carolina
Letelier, María José
author_sort Gatica, José Luis
collection PubMed
description Chile is a country where teledermatology has been growing exponentially since the implementation of a single national asynchronous teledermatology platform for the public system in December 2018. To ensure the quality of care in teledermatology systems, it is crucial to evaluate the fulfillment of basic specifiers such as ICD-Diagnosis, therapeutic suggestions, and diagnostic suggestions, among others. This article aims to evaluate the teledermatology system of the Chilean public health service by analyzing 243 randomly extracted consultations, representative of the 20,716 electronic consultations performed during 2020. Compliance with basic specifiers is evaluated. From these, fulfillment of core teledermatology functions, such as diagnostic and therapeutic suggestions, is observed in most consultations. There are statistically significant relationships between the patient’s destination (primary health center [PHC] or face-to-face referral), pharmacological prescription, coverage of the drug prescribed by the public system, and the education received by the consulting physician. If the consultation is resolved in the PHC, there is a higher chance for pharmacological prescription, prescribing mostly drugs that are covered by the government. This is less likely to occur when patients are referred for face-to-face evaluation. A targeted evaluation of education, pharmacological prescriptions, and their applicability is key to improving the quality of teledermatology systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10252681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102526812023-06-10 Teledermatology Evaluation and Feedback Systems: A Tool for Improving Care Gatica, José Luis Aragón-Caqueo, Diego Aedo, Gabriel Fuenzalida, Héctor Loubies, Rodrigo Aedo, Sócrates Carrasco, María Francisca Sabando, Vezna Cunill, Carolina Letelier, María José Healthcare (Basel) Article Chile is a country where teledermatology has been growing exponentially since the implementation of a single national asynchronous teledermatology platform for the public system in December 2018. To ensure the quality of care in teledermatology systems, it is crucial to evaluate the fulfillment of basic specifiers such as ICD-Diagnosis, therapeutic suggestions, and diagnostic suggestions, among others. This article aims to evaluate the teledermatology system of the Chilean public health service by analyzing 243 randomly extracted consultations, representative of the 20,716 electronic consultations performed during 2020. Compliance with basic specifiers is evaluated. From these, fulfillment of core teledermatology functions, such as diagnostic and therapeutic suggestions, is observed in most consultations. There are statistically significant relationships between the patient’s destination (primary health center [PHC] or face-to-face referral), pharmacological prescription, coverage of the drug prescribed by the public system, and the education received by the consulting physician. If the consultation is resolved in the PHC, there is a higher chance for pharmacological prescription, prescribing mostly drugs that are covered by the government. This is less likely to occur when patients are referred for face-to-face evaluation. A targeted evaluation of education, pharmacological prescriptions, and their applicability is key to improving the quality of teledermatology systems. MDPI 2023-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10252681/ /pubmed/37297766 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11111626 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gatica, José Luis
Aragón-Caqueo, Diego
Aedo, Gabriel
Fuenzalida, Héctor
Loubies, Rodrigo
Aedo, Sócrates
Carrasco, María Francisca
Sabando, Vezna
Cunill, Carolina
Letelier, María José
Teledermatology Evaluation and Feedback Systems: A Tool for Improving Care
title Teledermatology Evaluation and Feedback Systems: A Tool for Improving Care
title_full Teledermatology Evaluation and Feedback Systems: A Tool for Improving Care
title_fullStr Teledermatology Evaluation and Feedback Systems: A Tool for Improving Care
title_full_unstemmed Teledermatology Evaluation and Feedback Systems: A Tool for Improving Care
title_short Teledermatology Evaluation and Feedback Systems: A Tool for Improving Care
title_sort teledermatology evaluation and feedback systems: a tool for improving care
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10252681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37297766
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11111626
work_keys_str_mv AT gaticajoseluis teledermatologyevaluationandfeedbacksystemsatoolforimprovingcare
AT aragoncaqueodiego teledermatologyevaluationandfeedbacksystemsatoolforimprovingcare
AT aedogabriel teledermatologyevaluationandfeedbacksystemsatoolforimprovingcare
AT fuenzalidahector teledermatologyevaluationandfeedbacksystemsatoolforimprovingcare
AT loubiesrodrigo teledermatologyevaluationandfeedbacksystemsatoolforimprovingcare
AT aedosocrates teledermatologyevaluationandfeedbacksystemsatoolforimprovingcare
AT carrascomariafrancisca teledermatologyevaluationandfeedbacksystemsatoolforimprovingcare
AT sabandovezna teledermatologyevaluationandfeedbacksystemsatoolforimprovingcare
AT cunillcarolina teledermatologyevaluationandfeedbacksystemsatoolforimprovingcare
AT leteliermariajose teledermatologyevaluationandfeedbacksystemsatoolforimprovingcare