Cargando…

Comparative Studies of Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter Isolates from Broiler Chickens with and without Use of Enrofloxacin

This study investigated the effect of enrofloxacin (ENR) administration on the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of E. coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter isolated from broiler chickens under field conditions. The isolation rate of Salmonella was significantly lower (p < 0.05) on farms that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shang, Ke, Kim, Ji-Hyuk, Park, Jong-Yeol, Choi, Yu-Ri, Kim, Sang-Won, Cha, Se-Yeoun, Jang, Hyung-Kwan, Wei, Bai, Kang, Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10252696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37297483
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12112239
_version_ 1785056232488304640
author Shang, Ke
Kim, Ji-Hyuk
Park, Jong-Yeol
Choi, Yu-Ri
Kim, Sang-Won
Cha, Se-Yeoun
Jang, Hyung-Kwan
Wei, Bai
Kang, Min
author_facet Shang, Ke
Kim, Ji-Hyuk
Park, Jong-Yeol
Choi, Yu-Ri
Kim, Sang-Won
Cha, Se-Yeoun
Jang, Hyung-Kwan
Wei, Bai
Kang, Min
author_sort Shang, Ke
collection PubMed
description This study investigated the effect of enrofloxacin (ENR) administration on the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of E. coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter isolated from broiler chickens under field conditions. The isolation rate of Salmonella was significantly lower (p < 0.05) on farms that administered ENR (6.4%) than on farms that did not (11.6%). The Campylobacter isolation rate was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in farms that administered ENR (6.7%) than in farms that did not (3.3%). The ratio of resistance to ENR was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in E. coli isolates from farms that used ENR (88.1%) than farms that did not (78.0%). The respective ratio of resistance to ampicillin (40.5% vs. 17.9%), chloramphenicol (38.0% vs. 12.5%), tetracycline (63.3% vs. 23.2%), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (48.1% vs. 28.6%) and the ratio of intermediate resistance to ENR (67.1% vs. 48.2%) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in Salmonella isolates from the farms that used ENR than farms that did not. In conclusion, the use of ENR at broiler farms was an important factor in decreasing the prevalence of Salmonella but not Campylobacter and caused ENR resistance among E. coli and Salmonella but not Campylobacter. Exposure to ENR could have a co-selective effect on antimicrobial resistance in enteric bacteria in the field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10252696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102526962023-06-10 Comparative Studies of Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter Isolates from Broiler Chickens with and without Use of Enrofloxacin Shang, Ke Kim, Ji-Hyuk Park, Jong-Yeol Choi, Yu-Ri Kim, Sang-Won Cha, Se-Yeoun Jang, Hyung-Kwan Wei, Bai Kang, Min Foods Article This study investigated the effect of enrofloxacin (ENR) administration on the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of E. coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter isolated from broiler chickens under field conditions. The isolation rate of Salmonella was significantly lower (p < 0.05) on farms that administered ENR (6.4%) than on farms that did not (11.6%). The Campylobacter isolation rate was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in farms that administered ENR (6.7%) than in farms that did not (3.3%). The ratio of resistance to ENR was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in E. coli isolates from farms that used ENR (88.1%) than farms that did not (78.0%). The respective ratio of resistance to ampicillin (40.5% vs. 17.9%), chloramphenicol (38.0% vs. 12.5%), tetracycline (63.3% vs. 23.2%), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (48.1% vs. 28.6%) and the ratio of intermediate resistance to ENR (67.1% vs. 48.2%) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in Salmonella isolates from the farms that used ENR than farms that did not. In conclusion, the use of ENR at broiler farms was an important factor in decreasing the prevalence of Salmonella but not Campylobacter and caused ENR resistance among E. coli and Salmonella but not Campylobacter. Exposure to ENR could have a co-selective effect on antimicrobial resistance in enteric bacteria in the field. MDPI 2023-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10252696/ /pubmed/37297483 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12112239 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Shang, Ke
Kim, Ji-Hyuk
Park, Jong-Yeol
Choi, Yu-Ri
Kim, Sang-Won
Cha, Se-Yeoun
Jang, Hyung-Kwan
Wei, Bai
Kang, Min
Comparative Studies of Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter Isolates from Broiler Chickens with and without Use of Enrofloxacin
title Comparative Studies of Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter Isolates from Broiler Chickens with and without Use of Enrofloxacin
title_full Comparative Studies of Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter Isolates from Broiler Chickens with and without Use of Enrofloxacin
title_fullStr Comparative Studies of Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter Isolates from Broiler Chickens with and without Use of Enrofloxacin
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Studies of Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter Isolates from Broiler Chickens with and without Use of Enrofloxacin
title_short Comparative Studies of Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter Isolates from Broiler Chickens with and without Use of Enrofloxacin
title_sort comparative studies of antimicrobial resistance in escherichia coli, salmonella, and campylobacter isolates from broiler chickens with and without use of enrofloxacin
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10252696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37297483
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12112239
work_keys_str_mv AT shangke comparativestudiesofantimicrobialresistanceinescherichiacolisalmonellaandcampylobacterisolatesfrombroilerchickenswithandwithoutuseofenrofloxacin
AT kimjihyuk comparativestudiesofantimicrobialresistanceinescherichiacolisalmonellaandcampylobacterisolatesfrombroilerchickenswithandwithoutuseofenrofloxacin
AT parkjongyeol comparativestudiesofantimicrobialresistanceinescherichiacolisalmonellaandcampylobacterisolatesfrombroilerchickenswithandwithoutuseofenrofloxacin
AT choiyuri comparativestudiesofantimicrobialresistanceinescherichiacolisalmonellaandcampylobacterisolatesfrombroilerchickenswithandwithoutuseofenrofloxacin
AT kimsangwon comparativestudiesofantimicrobialresistanceinescherichiacolisalmonellaandcampylobacterisolatesfrombroilerchickenswithandwithoutuseofenrofloxacin
AT chaseyeoun comparativestudiesofantimicrobialresistanceinescherichiacolisalmonellaandcampylobacterisolatesfrombroilerchickenswithandwithoutuseofenrofloxacin
AT janghyungkwan comparativestudiesofantimicrobialresistanceinescherichiacolisalmonellaandcampylobacterisolatesfrombroilerchickenswithandwithoutuseofenrofloxacin
AT weibai comparativestudiesofantimicrobialresistanceinescherichiacolisalmonellaandcampylobacterisolatesfrombroilerchickenswithandwithoutuseofenrofloxacin
AT kangmin comparativestudiesofantimicrobialresistanceinescherichiacolisalmonellaandcampylobacterisolatesfrombroilerchickenswithandwithoutuseofenrofloxacin