Cargando…
Comparative Studies of Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter Isolates from Broiler Chickens with and without Use of Enrofloxacin
This study investigated the effect of enrofloxacin (ENR) administration on the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of E. coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter isolated from broiler chickens under field conditions. The isolation rate of Salmonella was significantly lower (p < 0.05) on farms that...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10252696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37297483 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12112239 |
_version_ | 1785056232488304640 |
---|---|
author | Shang, Ke Kim, Ji-Hyuk Park, Jong-Yeol Choi, Yu-Ri Kim, Sang-Won Cha, Se-Yeoun Jang, Hyung-Kwan Wei, Bai Kang, Min |
author_facet | Shang, Ke Kim, Ji-Hyuk Park, Jong-Yeol Choi, Yu-Ri Kim, Sang-Won Cha, Se-Yeoun Jang, Hyung-Kwan Wei, Bai Kang, Min |
author_sort | Shang, Ke |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study investigated the effect of enrofloxacin (ENR) administration on the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of E. coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter isolated from broiler chickens under field conditions. The isolation rate of Salmonella was significantly lower (p < 0.05) on farms that administered ENR (6.4%) than on farms that did not (11.6%). The Campylobacter isolation rate was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in farms that administered ENR (6.7%) than in farms that did not (3.3%). The ratio of resistance to ENR was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in E. coli isolates from farms that used ENR (88.1%) than farms that did not (78.0%). The respective ratio of resistance to ampicillin (40.5% vs. 17.9%), chloramphenicol (38.0% vs. 12.5%), tetracycline (63.3% vs. 23.2%), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (48.1% vs. 28.6%) and the ratio of intermediate resistance to ENR (67.1% vs. 48.2%) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in Salmonella isolates from the farms that used ENR than farms that did not. In conclusion, the use of ENR at broiler farms was an important factor in decreasing the prevalence of Salmonella but not Campylobacter and caused ENR resistance among E. coli and Salmonella but not Campylobacter. Exposure to ENR could have a co-selective effect on antimicrobial resistance in enteric bacteria in the field. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10252696 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102526962023-06-10 Comparative Studies of Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter Isolates from Broiler Chickens with and without Use of Enrofloxacin Shang, Ke Kim, Ji-Hyuk Park, Jong-Yeol Choi, Yu-Ri Kim, Sang-Won Cha, Se-Yeoun Jang, Hyung-Kwan Wei, Bai Kang, Min Foods Article This study investigated the effect of enrofloxacin (ENR) administration on the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of E. coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter isolated from broiler chickens under field conditions. The isolation rate of Salmonella was significantly lower (p < 0.05) on farms that administered ENR (6.4%) than on farms that did not (11.6%). The Campylobacter isolation rate was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in farms that administered ENR (6.7%) than in farms that did not (3.3%). The ratio of resistance to ENR was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in E. coli isolates from farms that used ENR (88.1%) than farms that did not (78.0%). The respective ratio of resistance to ampicillin (40.5% vs. 17.9%), chloramphenicol (38.0% vs. 12.5%), tetracycline (63.3% vs. 23.2%), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (48.1% vs. 28.6%) and the ratio of intermediate resistance to ENR (67.1% vs. 48.2%) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in Salmonella isolates from the farms that used ENR than farms that did not. In conclusion, the use of ENR at broiler farms was an important factor in decreasing the prevalence of Salmonella but not Campylobacter and caused ENR resistance among E. coli and Salmonella but not Campylobacter. Exposure to ENR could have a co-selective effect on antimicrobial resistance in enteric bacteria in the field. MDPI 2023-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10252696/ /pubmed/37297483 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12112239 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Shang, Ke Kim, Ji-Hyuk Park, Jong-Yeol Choi, Yu-Ri Kim, Sang-Won Cha, Se-Yeoun Jang, Hyung-Kwan Wei, Bai Kang, Min Comparative Studies of Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter Isolates from Broiler Chickens with and without Use of Enrofloxacin |
title | Comparative Studies of Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter Isolates from Broiler Chickens with and without Use of Enrofloxacin |
title_full | Comparative Studies of Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter Isolates from Broiler Chickens with and without Use of Enrofloxacin |
title_fullStr | Comparative Studies of Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter Isolates from Broiler Chickens with and without Use of Enrofloxacin |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Studies of Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter Isolates from Broiler Chickens with and without Use of Enrofloxacin |
title_short | Comparative Studies of Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter Isolates from Broiler Chickens with and without Use of Enrofloxacin |
title_sort | comparative studies of antimicrobial resistance in escherichia coli, salmonella, and campylobacter isolates from broiler chickens with and without use of enrofloxacin |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10252696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37297483 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12112239 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shangke comparativestudiesofantimicrobialresistanceinescherichiacolisalmonellaandcampylobacterisolatesfrombroilerchickenswithandwithoutuseofenrofloxacin AT kimjihyuk comparativestudiesofantimicrobialresistanceinescherichiacolisalmonellaandcampylobacterisolatesfrombroilerchickenswithandwithoutuseofenrofloxacin AT parkjongyeol comparativestudiesofantimicrobialresistanceinescherichiacolisalmonellaandcampylobacterisolatesfrombroilerchickenswithandwithoutuseofenrofloxacin AT choiyuri comparativestudiesofantimicrobialresistanceinescherichiacolisalmonellaandcampylobacterisolatesfrombroilerchickenswithandwithoutuseofenrofloxacin AT kimsangwon comparativestudiesofantimicrobialresistanceinescherichiacolisalmonellaandcampylobacterisolatesfrombroilerchickenswithandwithoutuseofenrofloxacin AT chaseyeoun comparativestudiesofantimicrobialresistanceinescherichiacolisalmonellaandcampylobacterisolatesfrombroilerchickenswithandwithoutuseofenrofloxacin AT janghyungkwan comparativestudiesofantimicrobialresistanceinescherichiacolisalmonellaandcampylobacterisolatesfrombroilerchickenswithandwithoutuseofenrofloxacin AT weibai comparativestudiesofantimicrobialresistanceinescherichiacolisalmonellaandcampylobacterisolatesfrombroilerchickenswithandwithoutuseofenrofloxacin AT kangmin comparativestudiesofantimicrobialresistanceinescherichiacolisalmonellaandcampylobacterisolatesfrombroilerchickenswithandwithoutuseofenrofloxacin |