Cargando…

How Tasmanian Emergency Departments ‘Choose Wisely’ When Investigating Suspected Pulmonary Embolism

Overuse of computed tomography pulmonary angiograms (CTPAs) for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) has been recognised as an issue for over ten years, with Choosing Wisely Australia recommending that CTPAs only be ordered if indicated by a clinical practice guideline (CPG). This study aimed to exp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thurlow, Lauren E., Van Dam, Pieter J., Prior, Sarah J., Tran, Viet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10252723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37297739
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11111599
_version_ 1785056238933901312
author Thurlow, Lauren E.
Van Dam, Pieter J.
Prior, Sarah J.
Tran, Viet
author_facet Thurlow, Lauren E.
Van Dam, Pieter J.
Prior, Sarah J.
Tran, Viet
author_sort Thurlow, Lauren E.
collection PubMed
description Overuse of computed tomography pulmonary angiograms (CTPAs) for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) has been recognised as an issue for over ten years, with Choosing Wisely Australia recommending that CTPAs only be ordered if indicated by a clinical practice guideline (CPG). This study aimed to explore the use of evidence-based practice within regional Tasmanian emergency departments in relation to CTPA orders by determining whether CTPAs were ordered in accordance with validated CPGs. We conducted a retrospective medical record review of all patients who underwent CTPA across all public emergency departments in Tasmania between 1 August 2018 and 31 December 2019 inclusive. Data from 2758 CTPAs across four emergency departments were included. PE was reported in 343 (12.4%) of CTPAs conducted, with yield ranging from 8.2% to 16.1% between the four sites. Overall, 52.1% of participants had neither a CPG documented, nor a D-dimer conducted before their scan. A CPG was documented before 11.8% of scans, while D-dimer was conducted before 43% of CTPAs. The findings presented in this study indicate that Tasmanian emergency departments are not consistently ‘Choosing Wisely’ when investigating PE. Further research is required to identify explanations for these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10252723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102527232023-06-10 How Tasmanian Emergency Departments ‘Choose Wisely’ When Investigating Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Thurlow, Lauren E. Van Dam, Pieter J. Prior, Sarah J. Tran, Viet Healthcare (Basel) Article Overuse of computed tomography pulmonary angiograms (CTPAs) for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) has been recognised as an issue for over ten years, with Choosing Wisely Australia recommending that CTPAs only be ordered if indicated by a clinical practice guideline (CPG). This study aimed to explore the use of evidence-based practice within regional Tasmanian emergency departments in relation to CTPA orders by determining whether CTPAs were ordered in accordance with validated CPGs. We conducted a retrospective medical record review of all patients who underwent CTPA across all public emergency departments in Tasmania between 1 August 2018 and 31 December 2019 inclusive. Data from 2758 CTPAs across four emergency departments were included. PE was reported in 343 (12.4%) of CTPAs conducted, with yield ranging from 8.2% to 16.1% between the four sites. Overall, 52.1% of participants had neither a CPG documented, nor a D-dimer conducted before their scan. A CPG was documented before 11.8% of scans, while D-dimer was conducted before 43% of CTPAs. The findings presented in this study indicate that Tasmanian emergency departments are not consistently ‘Choosing Wisely’ when investigating PE. Further research is required to identify explanations for these findings. MDPI 2023-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10252723/ /pubmed/37297739 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11111599 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Thurlow, Lauren E.
Van Dam, Pieter J.
Prior, Sarah J.
Tran, Viet
How Tasmanian Emergency Departments ‘Choose Wisely’ When Investigating Suspected Pulmonary Embolism
title How Tasmanian Emergency Departments ‘Choose Wisely’ When Investigating Suspected Pulmonary Embolism
title_full How Tasmanian Emergency Departments ‘Choose Wisely’ When Investigating Suspected Pulmonary Embolism
title_fullStr How Tasmanian Emergency Departments ‘Choose Wisely’ When Investigating Suspected Pulmonary Embolism
title_full_unstemmed How Tasmanian Emergency Departments ‘Choose Wisely’ When Investigating Suspected Pulmonary Embolism
title_short How Tasmanian Emergency Departments ‘Choose Wisely’ When Investigating Suspected Pulmonary Embolism
title_sort how tasmanian emergency departments ‘choose wisely’ when investigating suspected pulmonary embolism
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10252723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37297739
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11111599
work_keys_str_mv AT thurlowlaurene howtasmanianemergencydepartmentschoosewiselywheninvestigatingsuspectedpulmonaryembolism
AT vandampieterj howtasmanianemergencydepartmentschoosewiselywheninvestigatingsuspectedpulmonaryembolism
AT priorsarahj howtasmanianemergencydepartmentschoosewiselywheninvestigatingsuspectedpulmonaryembolism
AT tranviet howtasmanianemergencydepartmentschoosewiselywheninvestigatingsuspectedpulmonaryembolism