Cargando…

Resistance of Leukemia Cells to 5-Azacytidine: Different Responses to the Same Induction Protocol

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Although significant progress has been made in the treatment of myeloid malignancies, this issue remains a focus of interest for a large number of research teams. Current research is especially focused on elderly patients who are not suitable for intensive chemotherapy and bone marro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Šimoničová, Kristína, Janotka, Lubos, Kavcova, Helena, Sulova, Zdena, Messingerova, Lucia, Breier, Albert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10252867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37297025
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15113063
Descripción
Sumario:SIMPLE SUMMARY: Although significant progress has been made in the treatment of myeloid malignancies, this issue remains a focus of interest for a large number of research teams. Current research is especially focused on elderly patients who are not suitable for intensive chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation or patients who have achieved remission after such therapy but subsequently enter into relapse of the disease. Here, therapy with demethylating agents is indicated. However, we do not know of another treatment option in the case of resistance to such treatment. Therefore, knowledge of the causes and mechanisms of resistance to demethylating agents is an essential issue for improving the treatment of such patients. ABSTRACT: Three AML cell variants (M/A, M/A* from MOLM-13 and S/A from SKM-1) were established for resistance by the same protocol using 5-azacytidine (AZA) as a selection agent. These AZA-resistant variants differ in their responses to other cytosine nucleoside analogs, including 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (DAC), as well as in some molecular features. Differences in global DNA methylation, protein levels of DNA methyltransferases, and phosphorylation of histone H2AX were observed in response to AZA and DAC treatment in these cell variants. This could be due to changes in the expression of uridine-cytidine kinases 1 and 2 (UCK1 and UCK2) demonstrated in our cell variants. In the M/A variant that retained sensitivity to DAC, we detected a homozygous point mutation in UCK2 resulting in an amino acid substitution (L220R) that is likely responsible for AZA resistance. Cells administered AZA treatment can switch to de novo synthesis of pyrimidine nucleotides, which could be blocked by inhibition of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase by teriflunomide (TFN). This is shown by the synergistic effect of AZA and TFN in those variants that were cross-resistant to DAC and did not have a mutation in UCK2.