Cargando…

Exploring the Utility of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Radiomic Feature Extraction for Evaluation of Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Background: The aim of this study is to explore the utility of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging of radiomic features to distinguish active and inactive cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). Methods: Subjects were classified into active cardiac sarcoidosis (CS(active)) and inactive cardiac sarcoidosis (C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mushari, Nouf A., Soultanidis, Georgios, Duff, Lisa, Trivieri, Maria G., Fayad, Zahi A., Robson, Philip M., Tsoumpas, Charalampos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10252949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37296722
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13111865
Descripción
Sumario:Background: The aim of this study is to explore the utility of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging of radiomic features to distinguish active and inactive cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). Methods: Subjects were classified into active cardiac sarcoidosis (CS(active)) and inactive cardiac sarcoidosis (CS(inactive)) based on PET-CMR imaging. CS(active) was classified as featuring patchy [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([(18)F]FDG) uptake on PET and presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on CMR, while CS(inactive) was classified as featuring no [(18)F]FDG uptake in the presence of LGE on CMR. Among those screened, thirty CS(active) and thirty-one CS(inactive) patients met these criteria. A total of 94 radiomic features were subsequently extracted using PyRadiomics. The values of individual features were compared between CS(active) and CS(inactive) using the Mann–Whitney U test. Subsequently, machine learning (ML) approaches were tested. ML was applied to two sub-sets of radiomic features (signatures A and B) that were selected by logistic regression and PCA, respectively. Results: Univariate analysis of individual features showed no significant differences. Of all features, gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) joint entropy had a good area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy with the smallest confidence interval, suggesting it may be a good target for further investigation. Some ML classifiers achieved reasonable discrimination between CS(active) and CS(inactive) patients. With signature A, support vector machine and k-neighbors showed good performance with AUC (0.77 and 0.73) and accuracy (0.67 and 0.72), respectively. With signature B, decision tree demonstrated AUC and accuracy around 0.7; Conclusion: CMR radiomic analysis in CS provides promising results to distinguish patients with active and inactive disease.